From 8f0fd47fa33720dd09ad0ae74a8a583b9780e328 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Gustafsson Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:53:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Use snprintf instead of sprintf in pg_regress. To avoid static analyzers sounding the alarm, move to using snprintf instead of sprintf. This was an oversight in 66d6086cbcbfc8dee789a6. Reported-by: Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/849588.1698179694@sss.pgh.pa.us --- src/test/regress/pg_regress.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c index b0af751c92..b35e87295e 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c +++ b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ initialize_environment(void) { char s[16]; - sprintf(s, "%d", port); + snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "%d", port); setenv("PGPORT", s, 1); } } @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ initialize_environment(void) { char s[16]; - sprintf(s, "%d", port); + snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "%d", port); setenv("PGPORT", s, 1); } if (user != NULL)