mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
Update fsync FAQ item.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c86fac2787
commit
8d1c1d40ec
29
doc/FAQ
29
doc/FAQ
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL
|
||||
|
||||
Last updated: Mon Jun 10 16:44:55 EDT 2002
|
||||
Last updated: Mon Jun 10 22:22:31 EDT 2002
|
||||
|
||||
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -323,29 +323,16 @@
|
|||
reduce lock contention.
|
||||
|
||||
Performance
|
||||
PostgreSQL runs in two modes. Normal fsync mode flushes every
|
||||
completed transaction to disk, guaranteeing that if the OS
|
||||
crashes or loses power in the next few seconds, all your data
|
||||
is safely stored on disk. In this mode, we are slower than most
|
||||
commercial databases, partly because few of them do such
|
||||
conservative flushing to disk in their default modes. In
|
||||
no-fsync mode, we are usually faster than commercial databases,
|
||||
though in this mode, an OS crash could cause data corruption.
|
||||
We are working to provide an intermediate mode that suffers
|
||||
less performance overhead than full fsync mode, and will allow
|
||||
data integrity within 30 seconds of an OS crash.
|
||||
PostgreSQL has performance similar to other commercial and open
|
||||
source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
|
||||
others.
|
||||
In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are
|
||||
slower on inserts/updates because we have transaction overhead.
|
||||
Of course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in
|
||||
the Features section above. We are built for flexibility and
|
||||
features, though we continue to improve performance through
|
||||
profiling and source code analysis. There is an interesting Web
|
||||
page comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at
|
||||
http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html
|
||||
We handle each user connection by creating a Unix process.
|
||||
Backend processes share data buffers and locking information.
|
||||
With multiple CPUs, multiple backends can easily run on
|
||||
different CPUs.
|
||||
the Features section above. We are built for reliability and
|
||||
features, though we continue to improve performance in every
|
||||
release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL
|
||||
to MySQL at http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html
|
||||
|
||||
Reliability
|
||||
We realize that a DBMS must be reliable, or it is worthless. We
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
|
|||
alink="#0000ff">
|
||||
<H1>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for PostgreSQL</H1>
|
||||
|
||||
<P>Last updated: Mon Jun 10 16:44:55 EDT 2002</P>
|
||||
<P>Last updated: Mon Jun 10 22:22:31 EDT 2002</P>
|
||||
|
||||
<P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<A href=
|
||||
"mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR>
|
||||
|
@ -425,32 +425,20 @@
|
|||
|
||||
<DT><B>Performance</B></DT>
|
||||
|
||||
<DD>PostgreSQL runs in two modes. Normal <I>fsync</I> mode
|
||||
flushes every completed transaction to disk, guaranteeing that if
|
||||
the OS crashes or loses power in the next few seconds, all your
|
||||
data is safely stored on disk. In this mode, we are slower than
|
||||
most commercial databases, partly because few of them do such
|
||||
conservative flushing to disk in their default modes. In
|
||||
<I>no-fsync</I> mode, we are usually faster than commercial
|
||||
databases, though in this mode, an OS crash could cause data
|
||||
corruption. We are working to provide an intermediate mode that
|
||||
suffers less performance overhead than full fsync mode, and will
|
||||
allow data integrity within 30 seconds of an OS crash.<BR>
|
||||
<DD>PostgreSQL has performance similar to other commercial and
|
||||
open source databases. it is faster for some things, slower for
|
||||
others.
|
||||
<BR>
|
||||
In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are slower
|
||||
In comparison to MySQL or leaner database systems, we are slower
|
||||
on inserts/updates because we have transaction overhead. Of
|
||||
course, MySQL does not have any of the features mentioned in the
|
||||
<I>Features</I> section above. We are built for flexibility and
|
||||
features, though we continue to improve performance through
|
||||
profiling and source code analysis. There is an interesting Web
|
||||
page comparing PostgreSQL to MySQL at <A href=
|
||||
"http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html">http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR>
|
||||
<I>Features</I> section above. We are built for reliability and
|
||||
features, though we continue to improve performance in every
|
||||
release. There is an interesting Web page comparing PostgreSQL to
|
||||
MySQL at <A href= "http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html">
|
||||
|
||||
http://openacs.org/why-not-mysql.html</A><BR>
|
||||
|
||||
<BR>
|
||||
We handle each user connection by creating a Unix process.
|
||||
Backend processes share data buffers and locking information.
|
||||
With multiple CPUs, multiple backends can easily run on different
|
||||
CPUs.<BR>
|
||||
<BR>
|
||||
</DD>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue