More deadlock code to check for escallation locks.
offsetof() addition to local socket size.
This commit is contained in:
parent
54399bb2f9
commit
8abd424369
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/README,v 1.1.1.1 1996/07/09 06:21:55 scrappy Exp $
|
||||
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/README,v 1.2 1998/01/28 02:29:26 momjian Exp $
|
||||
|
||||
This file is an attempt to save me (and future code maintainers) some
|
||||
time and a lot of headaches. The existing lock manager code at the time
|
||||
@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ activeHolders -
|
||||
holders, summing the values of activeHolders should total to the value
|
||||
of nActive.
|
||||
|
||||
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
This is all I had the stomach for right now..... I will get back to this
|
||||
someday. -mer 17 June 1992 12:00 am
|
||||
Locks are accessed in two ways. Each PROC structure has a lockQueue,
|
||||
that is a circular linked list of LOCK pointers that this process holds
|
||||
or is waiting on.
|
||||
|
||||
Second, there is a hash table that can do a lookup by combined LOCK
|
||||
address and transaction id(xid) which allows a process to see what
|
||||
type of locks it holds on that table.
|
||||
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c,v 1.23 1998/01/27 15:34:49 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c,v 1.24 1998/01/28 02:29:27 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTES
|
||||
* Outside modules can create a lock table and acquire/release
|
||||
@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ LockResolveConflicts(LOCKTAB *ltable,
|
||||
tmpMask = 2;
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= nLockTypes; i++, tmpMask <<= 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (lock->activeHolders[i] - myHolders[i])
|
||||
if (lock->activeHolders[i] != myHolders[i])
|
||||
{
|
||||
bitmask |= tmpMask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1429,14 +1429,38 @@ DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
|
||||
XIDLookupEnt *tmp = NULL;
|
||||
SHMEM_OFFSET end = MAKE_OFFSET(lockQueue);
|
||||
LOCK *lock;
|
||||
static PROC* checked_procs[MaxBackendId];
|
||||
static int nprocs;
|
||||
|
||||
LOCKTAB *ltable;
|
||||
XIDLookupEnt *result,
|
||||
item;
|
||||
HTAB *xidTable;
|
||||
bool found;
|
||||
|
||||
static PROC* checked_procs[MaxBackendId];
|
||||
static int nprocs;
|
||||
static bool MyNHolding;
|
||||
|
||||
/* initialize at start of recursion */
|
||||
if (skip_check)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* initialize at start of recursion */
|
||||
checked_procs[0] = MyProc;
|
||||
nprocs = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
ltable = AllTables[1];
|
||||
xidTable = ltable->xidHash;
|
||||
|
||||
MemSet(&item, 0, XID_TAGSIZE);
|
||||
TransactionIdStore(MyProc->xid, &item.tag.xid);
|
||||
item.tag.lock = MAKE_OFFSET(findlock);
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
item.tag.pid = pid;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if ((result = (XIDLookupEnt *)
|
||||
hash_search(xidTable, (Pointer) &item, HASH_FIND, &found)) && found)
|
||||
MyNHolding = result->nHolding;
|
||||
else
|
||||
MyNHolding = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (SHMQueueEmpty(lockQueue))
|
||||
@ -1469,13 +1493,7 @@ DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
|
||||
if (lock == findlock && !skip_check)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No sense in looking at the wait queue of the lock we are
|
||||
* looking for as it is MyProc's lock entry.
|
||||
* If lock == findlock, and I got here, skip_check must be true.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lock != findlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
{
|
||||
PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue = &(lock->waitProcs);
|
||||
PROC *proc;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
@ -1484,16 +1502,70 @@ DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
|
||||
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(waitQueue->links.prev);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < waitQueue->size; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < nprocs; j++)
|
||||
if (checked_procs[j] == proc)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (j >= nprocs)
|
||||
if (proc != MyProc &&
|
||||
lock == findlock && /* skip_check also true */
|
||||
MyNHolding) /* I already hold some lock on it */
|
||||
{
|
||||
checked_procs[nprocs++] = proc;
|
||||
Assert(nprocs <= MaxBackendId);
|
||||
/* If we found a deadlock, we can stop right now */
|
||||
if (DeadLockCheck(&(proc->lockQueue), findlock, false))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For findlock's wait queue, we are interested in
|
||||
* procs who are blocked waiting for a write-lock on the
|
||||
* table we are waiting on, and already hold a lock on it.
|
||||
* We first check to see if there is an escalation
|
||||
* deadlock, where we hold a readlock and want a
|
||||
* writelock, and someone else holds readlock on
|
||||
* the same table, and wants a writelock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Basically, the test is, "Do we both hold some lock
|
||||
* on findlock, and we are both waiting in the lock
|
||||
* queue?"
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(skip_check);
|
||||
Assert(MyProc->prio == 2);
|
||||
|
||||
ltable = AllTables[1];
|
||||
xidTable = ltable->xidHash;
|
||||
|
||||
MemSet(&item, 0, XID_TAGSIZE);
|
||||
TransactionIdStore(proc->xid, &item.tag.xid);
|
||||
item.tag.lock = MAKE_OFFSET(findlock);
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
item.tag.pid = pid;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
if ((result = (XIDLookupEnt *)
|
||||
hash_search(xidTable, (Pointer) &item, HASH_FIND, &found)) && found)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (result->nHolding)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No sense in looking at the wait queue of the lock we are
|
||||
* looking for.
|
||||
* If lock == findlock, and I got here, skip_check must be
|
||||
* true too.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lock != findlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < nprocs; j++)
|
||||
if (checked_procs[j] == proc)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
if (j >= nprocs && lock != findlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
checked_procs[nprocs++] = proc;
|
||||
Assert(nprocs <= MaxBackendId);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For non-MyProc entries, we are looking only waiters,
|
||||
* not necessarily people who already hold locks and are
|
||||
* waiting.
|
||||
* Now we check for cases where we have two or more
|
||||
* tables in a deadlock. We do this by continuing
|
||||
* to search for someone holding a lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (DeadLockCheck(&(proc->lockQueue), findlock, false))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(proc->links.prev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.29 1998/01/27 03:00:29 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.30 1998/01/28 02:29:29 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
|
||||
* This is so that we can support more backends. (system-wide semaphore
|
||||
* sets run out pretty fast.) -ay 4/95
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.29 1998/01/27 03:00:29 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.30 1998/01/28 02:29:29 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include <sys/time.h>
|
||||
#include <unistd.h>
|
||||
@ -249,7 +249,10 @@ InitProcess(IPCKey key)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SpinRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
MyProc->pid = 0;
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
MyProc->pid = MyProcPid;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
MyProc->xid = InvalidTransactionId;
|
||||
|
||||
/* ----------------
|
||||
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $Id: pqcomm.h,v 1.21 1998/01/27 15:35:22 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Id: pqcomm.h,v 1.22 1998/01/28 02:29:40 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ typedef union SockAddr {
|
||||
|
||||
#define UNIXSOCK_PATH(sun,port) \
|
||||
(sprintf((sun).sun_path, "/tmp/.s.PGSQL.%d", (port)) + \
|
||||
+ 1 + sizeof ((sun).sun_family))
|
||||
offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path))
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* + 1 is for BSD-specific sizeof((sun).sun_len)
|
||||
* We never actually set sun_len, and I can't think of a
|
||||
* We do this because sun_len is in BSD's struct, while others don't.
|
||||
* We never actually set BSD's sun_len, and I can't think of a
|
||||
* platform-safe way of doing it, but the code still works. bjm
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user