mirrors/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use logical operator && instead of & in vacuumparallel.c.

Browse Source 
As such the current usage of & won't produce incorrect results but it
would be better to use && to short-circuit the evaluation of second
condition when the same is not required.

Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Bharath Rupireddy
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQApL8QcoYwQuutkWKY_h7gBY8F0Xs34YKfc7-G0i83K_pw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Amit Kapila 2022-08-22 08:53:58 +05:30
parent 49e525a08f
commit 838f798f17
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/backend/commands/vacuumparallel.c
View File

@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ parallel_vacuum_process_all_indexes(ParallelVacuumState *pvs, int num_index_scan
Assert(indstats->status == PARALLEL_INDVAC_STATUS_INITIAL);
indstats->status = new_status;
indstats->parallel_workers_can_process =
(pvs->will_parallel_vacuum[i] &
(pvs->will_parallel_vacuum[i] &&
parallel_vacuum_index_is_parallel_safe(pvs->indrels[i],
num_index_scans,
vacuum));