Come to think of it, we should check that commutator pairs have the same
merges/hashes property settings.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b259924e9f
commit
8076c8c7f0
@ -382,6 +382,16 @@ WHERE (p1.oprcanmerge OR p1.oprcanhash) AND NOT
|
||||
-----+---------
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- What's more, the commutator had better be mergejoinable/hashjoinable too.
|
||||
SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname, p2.oid, p2.oprname
|
||||
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
|
||||
WHERE p1.oprcom = p2.oid AND
|
||||
(p1.oprcanmerge != p2.oprcanmerge OR
|
||||
p1.oprcanhash != p2.oprcanhash);
|
||||
oid | oprname | oid | oprname
|
||||
-----+---------+-----+---------
|
||||
(0 rows)
|
||||
|
||||
-- Mergejoinable operators should appear as equality members of btree index
|
||||
-- opfamilies.
|
||||
SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname
|
||||
|
@ -315,6 +315,14 @@ SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname FROM pg_operator AS p1
|
||||
WHERE (p1.oprcanmerge OR p1.oprcanhash) AND NOT
|
||||
(p1.oprkind = 'b' AND p1.oprresult = 'bool'::regtype AND p1.oprcom != 0);
|
||||
|
||||
-- What's more, the commutator had better be mergejoinable/hashjoinable too.
|
||||
|
||||
SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname, p2.oid, p2.oprname
|
||||
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
|
||||
WHERE p1.oprcom = p2.oid AND
|
||||
(p1.oprcanmerge != p2.oprcanmerge OR
|
||||
p1.oprcanhash != p2.oprcanhash);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Mergejoinable operators should appear as equality members of btree index
|
||||
-- opfamilies.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user