Fix per-session activation of ALTER {ROLE|DATABASE} SET role.
After commit 5a2fed911a85ed6d8a015a6bafe3a0d9a69334ae, the catalog state resulting from these commands ceased to affect sessions. Restore the longstanding behavior, which is like beginning the session with a SET ROLE command. If cherry-picking the CVE-2024-10978 fixes, default to including this, too. (This fixes an unintended side effect of fixing CVE-2024-10978.) Back-patch to v12, like that commit. The release team decided to include v12, despite the original intent to halt v12 commits earlier this week. Tom Lane and Noah Misch. Reported by Etienne LAFARGE. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADOZwSb0UsEr4_UTFXC5k7=fyyK8uKXekucd+-uuGjJsGBfxgw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
e5ed873b1b
commit
7b88529f43
@ -824,7 +824,25 @@ InitializeSessionUserId(const char *rolename, Oid roleid, bool bypass_login_chec
|
||||
{
|
||||
SetAuthenticatedUserId(roleid);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Set SessionUserId and related variables via the GUC mechanisms */
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set SessionUserId and related variables, including "role", via the
|
||||
* GUC mechanisms.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: ideally we would use PGC_S_DYNAMIC_DEFAULT here, so that
|
||||
* session_authorization could subsequently be changed from
|
||||
* pg_db_role_setting entries. Instead, session_authorization in
|
||||
* pg_db_role_setting has no effect. Changing that would require
|
||||
* solving two problems:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. If pg_db_role_setting has values for both session_authorization
|
||||
* and role, we could not be sure which order those would be applied
|
||||
* in, and it would matter.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2. Sites may have years-old session_authorization entries. There's
|
||||
* not been any particular reason to remove them. Ending the dormancy
|
||||
* of those entries could seriously change application behavior, so
|
||||
* only a major release should do that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SetConfigOption("session_authorization", rname,
|
||||
PGC_BACKEND, PGC_S_OVERRIDE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -4099,6 +4099,12 @@ set_config_with_handle(const char *name, config_handle *handle,
|
||||
* expect that if "role" isn't supposed to be default, it
|
||||
* has been or will be set by a separate reload action.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, for the call from InitializeSessionUserId with
|
||||
* source == PGC_S_OVERRIDE, use PGC_S_DYNAMIC_DEFAULT for
|
||||
* "role"'s source, so that it's still possible to set
|
||||
* "role" from pg_db_role_setting entries. (See notes in
|
||||
* InitializeSessionUserId before changing this.)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* A fine point: for RESET session_authorization, we do
|
||||
* "RESET role" not "SET ROLE NONE" (by passing down NULL
|
||||
* rather than "none" for the value). This would have the
|
||||
@ -4111,7 +4117,9 @@ set_config_with_handle(const char *name, config_handle *handle,
|
||||
(void) set_config_with_handle("role", NULL,
|
||||
value ? "none" : NULL,
|
||||
orig_context,
|
||||
orig_source,
|
||||
(orig_source == PGC_S_OVERRIDE)
|
||||
? PGC_S_DYNAMIC_DEFAULT
|
||||
: orig_source,
|
||||
orig_srole,
|
||||
action,
|
||||
true,
|
||||
|
@ -1,6 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# src/test/modules/unsafe_tests/Makefile
|
||||
|
||||
REGRESS = rolenames alter_system_table guc_privs
|
||||
REGRESS = rolenames setconfig alter_system_table guc_privs
|
||||
REGRESS_OPTS = \
|
||||
--create-role=regress_authenticated_user_sr \
|
||||
--create-role=regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
|
||||
# the whole point of these tests is to not run installcheck
|
||||
NO_INSTALLCHECK = 1
|
||||
|
31
src/test/modules/unsafe_tests/expected/setconfig.out
Normal file
31
src/test/modules/unsafe_tests/expected/setconfig.out
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
-- This is borderline unsafe in that an additional login-capable user exists
|
||||
-- during the test run. Under installcheck, a too-permissive pg_hba.conf
|
||||
-- might allow unwanted logins as regress_authenticated_user_ssa.
|
||||
ALTER USER regress_authenticated_user_ssa superuser;
|
||||
CREATE ROLE regress_session_user;
|
||||
CREATE ROLE regress_current_user;
|
||||
GRANT regress_current_user TO regress_authenticated_user_sr;
|
||||
GRANT regress_session_user TO regress_authenticated_user_ssa;
|
||||
ALTER ROLE regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
SET session_authorization = regress_session_user;
|
||||
ALTER ROLE regress_authenticated_user_sr SET ROLE = regress_current_user;
|
||||
\c - regress_authenticated_user_sr
|
||||
SELECT current_user, session_user;
|
||||
current_user | session_user
|
||||
----------------------+-------------------------------
|
||||
regress_current_user | regress_authenticated_user_sr
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
-- The longstanding historical behavior is that session_authorization in
|
||||
-- setconfig has no effect. Hence, session_user remains
|
||||
-- regress_authenticated_user_ssa. See comment in InitializeSessionUserId().
|
||||
\c - regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
SELECT current_user, session_user;
|
||||
current_user | session_user
|
||||
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
|
||||
regress_authenticated_user_ssa | regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
|
||||
DROP USER regress_session_user;
|
||||
DROP USER regress_current_user;
|
@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ tests += {
|
||||
'regress': {
|
||||
'sql': [
|
||||
'rolenames',
|
||||
'setconfig',
|
||||
'alter_system_table',
|
||||
'guc_privs',
|
||||
],
|
||||
'regress_args': ['--create-role=regress_authenticated_user_sr',
|
||||
'--create-role=regress_authenticated_user_ssa'],
|
||||
'runningcheck': false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
24
src/test/modules/unsafe_tests/sql/setconfig.sql
Normal file
24
src/test/modules/unsafe_tests/sql/setconfig.sql
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
-- This is borderline unsafe in that an additional login-capable user exists
|
||||
-- during the test run. Under installcheck, a too-permissive pg_hba.conf
|
||||
-- might allow unwanted logins as regress_authenticated_user_ssa.
|
||||
|
||||
ALTER USER regress_authenticated_user_ssa superuser;
|
||||
CREATE ROLE regress_session_user;
|
||||
CREATE ROLE regress_current_user;
|
||||
GRANT regress_current_user TO regress_authenticated_user_sr;
|
||||
GRANT regress_session_user TO regress_authenticated_user_ssa;
|
||||
ALTER ROLE regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
SET session_authorization = regress_session_user;
|
||||
ALTER ROLE regress_authenticated_user_sr SET ROLE = regress_current_user;
|
||||
|
||||
\c - regress_authenticated_user_sr
|
||||
SELECT current_user, session_user;
|
||||
|
||||
-- The longstanding historical behavior is that session_authorization in
|
||||
-- setconfig has no effect. Hence, session_user remains
|
||||
-- regress_authenticated_user_ssa. See comment in InitializeSessionUserId().
|
||||
\c - regress_authenticated_user_ssa
|
||||
SELECT current_user, session_user;
|
||||
RESET SESSION AUTHORIZATION;
|
||||
DROP USER regress_session_user;
|
||||
DROP USER regress_current_user;
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user