Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> As you can see, psql reconnect as any user if the password is same as > foo. Of course this is due to the careless password setting, but I > think it's better to prompt ANY TIME the user tries to switch to > another user. Comments? Yeah, I agree. Looks like a simple change in dbconnect(): /* * Use old password if no new one given (if you didn't have an old * one, fine) */ if (!pwparam && oldconn) pwparam = PQpass(oldconn); to /* * Use old password (if any) if no new one given and we are * reconnecting as same user */ if (!pwparam && oldconn && PQuser(oldconn) && userparam && strcmp(PQuser(oldconn), userparam) == 0) pwparam = PQpass(oldconn); regards, tom lane
This commit is contained in:
parent
b0c4598c66
commit
78f7ba13cb
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Copyright 2000 by PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/bin/psql/command.c,v 1.59 2001/10/05 19:01:13 momjian Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/bin/psql/command.c,v 1.60 2001/10/11 16:54:18 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#include "postgres_fe.h"
|
||||
#include "command.h"
|
||||
@ -1287,7 +1287,8 @@ do_connect(const char *new_dbname, const char *new_user)
|
||||
* Use old password if no new one given (if you didn't have an old
|
||||
* one, fine)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!pwparam && oldconn)
|
||||
if (!pwparam && oldconn && PQuser(oldconn) && userparam &&
|
||||
strcmp(PQuser(oldconn), userparam) == 0)
|
||||
pwparam = PQpass(oldconn);
|
||||
|
||||
do
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user