From 787654351d36cc537db5fb969fd895d85400ba5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 04:12:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add "OK, OK, Hiroshi's right" thread. --- doc/TODO.detail/tablespaces | 933 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 835 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/TODO.detail/tablespaces b/doc/TODO.detail/tablespaces index 425eb07102..ed7f603d52 100644 --- a/doc/TODO.detail/tablespaces +++ b/doc/TODO.detail/tablespaces @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M174@hub.org Sun Mar 12 22:31:11 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA25886 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:31:10 -0500 (EST) -Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA04589 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:19:33 -0500 (EST) +Received: from news.tht.net (news.hub.org [216.126.91.242]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA04589 for ; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:19:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by news.tht.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA42854; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:05:05 -0500 (EST) @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Wed Mar 15 02:00:58 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA17887 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 03:00:57 -0500 (EST) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id CAA02974 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 02:54:44 -0500 (EST) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id CAA02974 for ; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 02:54:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA00734; Wed, 15 Mar 2000 16:53:56 +0900 @@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ From JanWieck@t-online.de Wed Jun 14 19:01:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA21372 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id SAA01930 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:51:11 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id SAA01930 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:51:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 132Lz6-0004ec-01; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 00:50:08 +0200 @@ -1336,7 +1336,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3400@hub.org Thu Jun 15 03:31:16 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA24604 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:31:15 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA01191 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:15:28 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA01191 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:15:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5F7CP835301; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:12:25 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 15 03:31:11 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA24592 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:31:10 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA01213 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:15:46 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA01213 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA18833; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:14:30 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3401@hub.org Thu Jun 15 03:31:15 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA24601 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:31:14 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA01428 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:19:39 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA01428 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:19:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5F7GP843802; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 03:16:25 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ From ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at Thu Jun 15 04:31:04 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA25144 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:31:03 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id EAA03225 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:05:41 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id EAA03225 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:05:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sdexcgtw01.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (sdgtw.sd.spardat.at [172.18.1.16]) by gandalf.it-austria.net (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id KAA100894; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 10:04:52 +0200 @@ -1604,7 +1604,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3405@hub.org Thu Jun 15 04:31:09 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA25151 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:31:07 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id EAA04151 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:30:23 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id EAA04151 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:30:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5F8RI883087; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:27:18 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3407@hub.org Thu Jun 15 05:01:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA25462 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 05:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id EAA04667 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:45:51 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id EAA04667 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:45:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5F8gr817124; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 04:42:53 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1714,7 +1714,7 @@ From scrappy@hub.org Thu Jun 15 08:30:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA03846 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:30:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat193.152.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.193.152]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id IAA14167 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:16:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat193.152.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.193.152]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id IAA14167 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:16:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA74856; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:14:29 -0300 (ADT) @@ -1769,7 +1769,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3412@hub.org Thu Jun 15 08:30:55 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA03842 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:30:54 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id IAA15241 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:31:29 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id IAA15241 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:31:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5FCSM877572; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 08:28:22 -0400 (EDT) @@ -1932,7 +1932,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Thu Jun 15 09:31:05 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA04418 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:31:04 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id JAA20080 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:22:36 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id JAA20080 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:22:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id GAA05755; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 06:21:54 -0700 (PDT) @@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3440@hub.org Thu Jun 15 14:46:22 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA04607 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 14:46:21 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA12695 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:48:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA12695 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:48:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5FGjXI40370; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:45:33 -0400 (EDT) @@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3448@hub.org Thu Jun 15 19:01:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA00764 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id SAA17328 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 18:57:32 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id SAA17328 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 18:57:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5FMsMI97744; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 18:54:22 -0400 (EDT) @@ -2233,7 +2233,7 @@ From pgsql-patches-owner+M233@hub.org Thu Jun 15 19:31:07 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA01228 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:31:04 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA17880 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:05:42 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA17880 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:05:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5FN11I12640; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:01:01 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3443,7 +3443,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3451@hub.org Thu Jun 15 20:01:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA01651 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA20985 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:57:49 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA20985 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:57:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5FNsgI25402; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:54:42 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3519,7 +3519,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 15 20:00:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA01647 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:00:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA21034 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:58:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA21034 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA02283; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 19:57:05 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3560,7 +3560,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3453@hub.org Thu Jun 15 21:01:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA02731 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:01:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id UAA23469 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:36:36 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA23469 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5G0WDI97134; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 20:32:13 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3636,7 +3636,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 15 22:01:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA03637 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:01:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id VAA28521 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:58:46 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id VAA28521 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:58:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA02730; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 21:57:27 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3839,7 +3839,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Thu Jun 15 23:31:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA06634; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:30:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA03227; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:18:54 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA03227; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:18:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA07544; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:18:06 +0900 @@ -3910,7 +3910,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3465@hub.org Fri Jun 16 00:01:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA06924 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 00:01:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA05470 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:59:46 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA05470 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:59:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5G3uaI10809; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 23:56:36 -0400 (EDT) @@ -3971,7 +3971,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Fri Jun 16 02:01:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA08093 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 02:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA10174 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:34:44 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA10174 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:34:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA07656; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:33:12 +0900 @@ -4057,7 +4057,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3469@hub.org Fri Jun 16 02:01:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA08109 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 02:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA11218 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:57:33 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA11218 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:57:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5G5tLI49492; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 01:55:21 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4129,7 +4129,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3471@hub.org Fri Jun 16 03:31:05 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA12816 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:31:04 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA14405 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:03:38 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA14405 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:03:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5G71YI83633; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:01:34 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4233,7 +4233,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3473@hub.org Fri Jun 16 04:01:12 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA13087 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 04:01:11 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA16002 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:37:24 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA16002 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:37:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5G7ZZI51521; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 03:35:35 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4288,7 +4288,7 @@ From JanWieck@t-online.de Fri Jun 16 11:01:06 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA28913 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:01:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id KAA01818 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:46:42 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id KAA01818 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:46:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 132xN9-0006ze-03; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:45:27 +0200 @@ -4426,7 +4426,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Fri Jun 16 12:01:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA29853 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA08255 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:48:10 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA08255 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:48:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07461; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:46:41 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4509,7 +4509,7 @@ From lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu Fri Jun 16 12:31:50 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA00649 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:31:49 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA13118 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:31:52 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA13118 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:31:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (hectic-1 [128.149.68.203]) by huey.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA15007; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT) @@ -4568,7 +4568,7 @@ From scrappy@hub.org Fri Jun 16 13:01:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA01191; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat193.152.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.193.152]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA15282; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:53:23 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat193.152.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.193.152]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA15282; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:53:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA28326; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:50:37 -0300 (ADT) @@ -4628,7 +4628,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Fri Jun 16 13:01:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA01188 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:01:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA15530 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:55:38 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA15530 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:55:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07750; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:54:00 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4669,7 +4669,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Fri Jun 16 14:55:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA02086 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:54:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id OAA26430 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:40:00 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id OAA26430 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:40:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id LAA08661; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:38:36 -0700 (PDT) @@ -4775,7 +4775,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3500@hub.org Fri Jun 16 14:55:10 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA02107 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:55:09 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id OAA26943 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:44:12 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id OAA26943 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:44:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5GIelM05972; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:40:47 -0400 (EDT) @@ -4905,7 +4905,7 @@ From reedstrm@rice.edu Fri Jun 16 16:51:50 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA03689 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:51:49 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from wallace.ece.rice.edu (wallace.ece.rice.edu [128.42.12.154]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id PAA03409 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:48:40 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from wallace.ece.rice.edu (wallace.ece.rice.edu [128.42.12.154]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id PAA03409 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:48:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by rice.edu via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) @@ -5018,7 +5018,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Fri Jun 16 16:51:51 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA03692 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:51:50 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id PAA02911 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:43:13 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id PAA02911 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id MAA11003; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:41:50 -0700 (PDT) @@ -5084,7 +5084,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3512@hub.org Fri Jun 16 17:31:04 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA04168 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:31:03 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id RAA12122 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:09:28 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id RAA12122 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:09:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5GL7WM02231; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 17:07:32 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5213,7 +5213,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Fri Jun 16 19:31:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA05334 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:30:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA19834 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:09:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA19834 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mcadnote1 (ppm122.noc.fukui.nsk.ne.jp [210.161.188.41]) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA08210; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:08:15 +0900 @@ -5271,7 +5271,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Fri Jun 16 19:31:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA05337 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA20335 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:18:26 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA20335 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:18:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA09274; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:16:37 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5384,7 +5384,7 @@ From chris@bitmead.com Fri Jun 16 21:01:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA07578; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:01:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from tech.com.au (IDENT:root@techpt.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.122]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id UAA24724; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:39:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from tech.com.au (IDENT:root@techpt.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.122]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA24724; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bitmead.com (IDENT:chris@tardis [203.41.180.243]) by tech.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21388; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 10:39:21 +1000 @@ -5418,7 +5418,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Sat Jun 17 06:00:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA22177; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 06:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id FAA21759; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:36:27 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id FAA21759; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:36:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mcadnote1 (ppm130.noc.fukui.nsk.ne.jp [210.161.188.49]) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id SAA08383; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:35:36 +0900 @@ -5470,7 +5470,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Sat Jun 17 12:31:08 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA02794; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:31:07 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA07194; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:12:53 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA07194; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:12:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18824; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:11:18 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5506,7 +5506,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Sun Jun 18 12:30:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA06514 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 12:30:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA04979 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 12:07:44 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA04979 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 12:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12163; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 12:06:29 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5575,7 +5575,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Sun Jun 18 20:01:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA19951 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (asteroid.pacifier.com [199.2.117.154]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA24345 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 19:50:06 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (asteroid.pacifier.com [199.2.117.154]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA24345 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 19:50:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id QAA05302; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 16:49:27 -0700 (PDT) @@ -5624,7 +5624,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3571@hub.org Sun Jun 18 23:28:13 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA23880 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:28:12 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA04627 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:24:37 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA04627 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:24:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5J3GQM78526; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:16:26 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5672,7 +5672,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Mon Jun 19 00:31:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA01941 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA06881 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:11:39 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA06881 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:11:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id VAA29138; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 21:11:01 -0700 (PDT) @@ -5715,7 +5715,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3573@hub.org Mon Jun 19 01:31:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA01981 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:31:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA09569 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:13:53 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA09569 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:13:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5J4T3M86960; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:29:04 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5762,7 +5762,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Mon Jun 19 00:30:58 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA01934 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:30:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA07814 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:29:36 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA07814 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:29:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA09535; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:28:14 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5798,7 +5798,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3574@hub.org Mon Jun 19 01:31:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA01977 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA09374 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:07:50 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA09374 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 01:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5J4VkM95901; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:31:46 -0400 (EDT) @@ -5843,7 +5843,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Mon Jun 19 00:58:39 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA00799 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:58:38 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA08143 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:37:39 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA08143 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:37:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id VAA00259; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 21:36:25 -0700 (PDT) @@ -5902,7 +5902,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Mon Jun 19 12:31:17 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA29988 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:31:16 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (mail.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA21005 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:15:22 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (mail.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA21005 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 12:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mcadnote1 (ppm127.noc.fukui.nsk.ne.jp [210.161.188.46]) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id BAA09828; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:14:19 +0900 @@ -5957,7 +5957,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Tue Jun 20 02:01:04 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA24419 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 02:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA26090 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:51:00 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA26090 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 01:51:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA10171; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:50:03 +0900 @@ -6031,7 +6031,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Tue Jun 20 10:51:32 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA15181 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:51:31 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id KAA26466 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:37:20 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id KAA26466 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:37:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29689; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:36:04 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6113,7 +6113,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3615@hub.org Tue Jun 20 12:55:05 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA25768 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:55:04 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA09949 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:41:15 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA09949 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:41:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5KGcCM19112; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 12:38:12 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6222,7 +6222,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Tue Jun 20 17:10:56 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA10307 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 17:10:55 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (mail.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id QAA08017 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:57:44 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (mail.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id QAA08017 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 16:57:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mcadnote1 (ppm127.noc.fukui.nsk.ne.jp [210.161.188.46]) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id FAA00867; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 05:56:44 +0900 @@ -6288,7 +6288,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Tue Jun 20 20:00:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA12668; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 20:00:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA21016; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:54:18 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA21016; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:54:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA00974; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:52:38 +0900 @@ -6353,7 +6353,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 00:23:48 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA18016; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:23:47 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA05207; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:07:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA05207; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:07:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03002; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 00:06:42 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6480,7 +6480,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3636@hub.org Wed Jun 21 01:31:12 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA20523 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:31:12 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA08982 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:15:17 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA08982 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:15:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5L5Bp151546; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:11:51 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6538,7 +6538,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Wed Jun 21 01:31:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA20492 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:30:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA09401 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:22:50 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA09401 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:22:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id WAA22395; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:21:47 -0700 (PDT) @@ -6587,7 +6587,7 @@ From lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu Wed Jun 21 01:31:07 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA20508; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:31:06 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA09355; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:22:03 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA09355; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:22:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (hectic-1 [128.149.68.203]) by huey.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA00821; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 22:18:38 -0700 (PDT) @@ -6641,7 +6641,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 01:31:05 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA20503 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:31:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA09513 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:25:18 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA09513 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:25:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA03557; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:23:58 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6697,7 +6697,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3641@hub.org Wed Jun 21 02:31:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA25698 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id CAA11423 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:09:13 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id CAA11423 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:09:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5L5we151226; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 01:58:40 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6765,7 +6765,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3644@hub.org Wed Jun 21 02:31:03 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA25704 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:31:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id CAA11923 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:22:41 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id CAA11923 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:22:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5L6JO196109; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 02:19:24 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6822,7 +6822,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3648@hub.org Wed Jun 21 09:01:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA06055 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:01:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id IAA29647 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:52:25 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id IAA29647 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:52:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5LCo0112103; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:50:00 -0400 (EDT) @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ From e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE Wed Jun 21 10:01:10 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA06585; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:01:09 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from meryl.it.uu.se (root@meryl.it.uu.se [130.238.12.42]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id JAA03592; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:38:34 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from meryl.it.uu.se (root@meryl.it.uu.se [130.238.12.42]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id JAA03592; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:38:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Ulv.DoCS.UU.SE (e99re41@Ulv.DoCS.UU.SE [130.238.9.167]) by meryl.it.uu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA20520; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:34:34 +0200 (MET DST) @@ -6951,7 +6951,7 @@ From e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE Wed Jun 21 10:01:09 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA06582; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:01:08 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from meryl.it.uu.se (root@meryl.it.uu.se [130.238.12.42]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id JAA04510; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:43:48 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from meryl.it.uu.se (root@meryl.it.uu.se [130.238.12.42]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id JAA04510; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:43:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Ulv.DoCS.UU.SE (e99re41@Ulv.DoCS.UU.SE [130.238.9.167]) by meryl.it.uu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA20730; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:39:23 +0200 (MET DST) @@ -6995,7 +6995,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 11:31:09 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA08120; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:31:08 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA13232; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:08:38 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA13232; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:08:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04286; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:07:20 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7050,7 +7050,7 @@ From lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu Wed Jun 21 11:31:10 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA08135; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:31:09 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA15864; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:30:06 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from huey.jpl.nasa.gov (huey.jpl.nasa.gov [128.149.68.100]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA15864; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:30:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from golem.jpl.nasa.gov (hectic-1 [128.149.68.203]) by huey.jpl.nasa.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA02881; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT) @@ -7108,7 +7108,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 11:31:18 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA08164; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:31:12 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA15786; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:29:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA15786; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:29:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04451; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:28:09 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7187,7 +7187,7 @@ From lamar.owen@wgcr.org Wed Jun 21 11:51:39 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA09021; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:51:38 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from www.wgcr.org (IDENT:root@www.wgcr.org [206.74.232.194]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA18613; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:51:48 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from www.wgcr.org (IDENT:root@www.wgcr.org [206.74.232.194]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA18613; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:51:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wgcr.org ([206.74.232.197]) by www.wgcr.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/WGCR) with ESMTP id LAA19124; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:48:25 -0400 @@ -7299,7 +7299,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3670@hub.org Wed Jun 21 12:30:42 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA10371 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:30:41 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA22315 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:23:18 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA22315 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5LGJU175424; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:19:30 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7356,7 +7356,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 12:30:40 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA10364 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:30:38 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA22593 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:25:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA22593 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04944; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:24:44 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7408,7 +7408,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 13:01:06 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA11366 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id MAA24726 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:47:50 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA24726 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:47:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA05112; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 12:46:34 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7459,7 +7459,7 @@ From peter@localhost.its.uu.se Wed Jun 21 14:31:13 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA13233 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:31:13 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id OAA04201 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:11:42 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id OAA04201 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 14:11:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:34923 "EHLO regulus.its.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with ESMTP id ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:09:46 +0200 @@ -7513,7 +7513,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 18:14:19 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA24147 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:14:18 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id RAA24649 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:40:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id RAA24649 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:40:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06031; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 17:39:38 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7561,7 +7561,7 @@ From vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM Wed Jun 21 22:18:38 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07570; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:18:36 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA29965; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:07:37 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA29965; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:07:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by SECTORBASE2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 15:58:30 -0700 Message-ID: <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C2B@SECTORBASE1> @@ -7616,7 +7616,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Wed Jun 21 22:18:39 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07573; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:18:38 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id TAA01857; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:37:04 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id TAA01857; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 19:37:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA02627; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 08:35:27 +0900 @@ -7684,7 +7684,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Wed Jun 21 22:18:15 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07540; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:18:11 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id UAA04100; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:15:09 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA04100; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:15:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA02691; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:14:15 +0900 @@ -7743,7 +7743,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Wed Jun 21 22:18:16 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07553; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:18:15 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id UAA05872; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:44:21 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA05872; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 20:44:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id JAA02750; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 09:43:31 +0900 @@ -7804,7 +7804,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3700@hub.org Wed Jun 21 22:17:59 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07504 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:17:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id VAA07914 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:23:22 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id VAA07914 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:23:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M1It194420; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:18:55 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7864,7 +7864,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3701@hub.org Wed Jun 21 22:18:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07513 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:18:01 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id VAA08502 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:33:13 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id VAA08502 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:33:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M1QS107400; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:26:28 -0400 (EDT) @@ -7926,7 +7926,7 @@ From vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM Wed Jun 21 22:17:52 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA07492; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:17:51 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id VAA08730; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:37:44 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id VAA08730; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:37:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by SECTORBASE2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 18:28:36 -0700 Message-ID: <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C2F@SECTORBASE1> @@ -7978,7 +7978,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Wed Jun 21 23:22:36 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA10350 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:22:35 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA13743 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:07:50 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA13743 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA03008; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 12:07:00 +0900 @@ -8041,7 +8041,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Wed Jun 21 23:22:38 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA10353 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:22:36 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id XAA14206 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:16:26 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id XAA14206 for ; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:16:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA07099; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:14:50 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8105,7 +8105,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3711@hub.org Thu Jun 22 01:01:06 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA22245 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA18310 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:43:00 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA18310 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:43:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M3US167109; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 23:30:28 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8164,7 +8164,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 22 01:01:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id BAA22232; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id AAA17842; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:31:06 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id AAA17842; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:31:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA07254; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 00:29:42 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8214,7 +8214,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3720@hub.org Thu Jun 22 02:01:02 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA24025 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 02:01:02 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA21392 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:56:49 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA21392 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:56:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M5jp143149; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:45:51 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8269,7 +8269,7 @@ From dhogaza@pacifier.com Thu Jun 22 02:00:58 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA24005 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 02:00:58 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA21369 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:56:18 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from smtp.pacifier.com (comet.pacifier.com [199.2.117.155]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA21369 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:56:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from desktop (dsl-dhogaza.pacifier.net [207.202.226.68]) by smtp.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id WAA12121; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 22:55:39 -0700 (PDT) @@ -8306,7 +8306,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Thu Jun 22 02:01:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id CAA24009 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 02:00:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id BAA21277 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:54:44 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id BAA21277 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 01:54:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id OAA03303; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:53:52 +0900 @@ -8378,7 +8378,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 22 03:31:04 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA28813 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:31:03 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA23901 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:06:47 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA23901 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:06:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA07725; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:05:00 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8417,7 +8417,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3727@hub.org Thu Jun 22 03:31:06 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id DAA28819 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:31:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA24751 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:29:00 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA24751 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:29:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M7KP140211; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:20:25 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8479,7 +8479,7 @@ From zeugswettera@wien.spardat.at Thu Jun 22 05:01:11 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA29525 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 05:01:09 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id EAA27070 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:38:32 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id EAA27070 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from peligor.server.lan.at (peligor.server.lan.at [10.8.32.84]) by gandalf.it-austria.net (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id KAA23252; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 10:37:45 +0200 @@ -8540,7 +8540,7 @@ From pjw@rhyme.com.au Thu Jun 22 04:01:05 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA29060 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:01:03 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from acheron.rime.com.au (root@albatr.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.54.222]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id DAA25604 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:50:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from acheron.rime.com.au (root@albatr.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.54.222]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id DAA25604 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 03:50:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oberon (Oberon.rime.com.au [203.8.195.100]) by acheron.rime.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA08811; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 17:43:22 +1000 @@ -8617,7 +8617,7 @@ From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3730@hub.org Thu Jun 22 05:31:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id FAA29741 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 05:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id FAA28478 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 05:18:37 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id FAA28478 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 05:18:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5M96W171286; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 05:06:32 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8677,7 +8677,7 @@ From Inoue@tpf.co.jp Thu Jun 22 07:31:01 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA07559 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 07:31:00 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id HAA02741 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 07:08:29 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id HAA02741 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 07:08:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP id UAA03834; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 20:06:51 +0900 @@ -8729,7 +8729,7 @@ From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Thu Jun 22 11:31:06 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA10544 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:31:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id LAA23513 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:28:53 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id LAA23513 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:28:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08851; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:27:30 -0400 (EDT) @@ -8770,7 +8770,7 @@ From vmikheev@SECTORBASE.COM Thu Jun 22 14:31:00 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA11892 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:30:59 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id OAA10107 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:17:04 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sectorbase2.sectorbase.com ([208.48.122.131]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id OAA10107 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 14:17:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by SECTORBASE2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 11:07:59 -0700 Message-ID: <8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018C31@SECTORBASE1> @@ -8835,7 +8835,7 @@ From peter@localhost.its.uu.se Thu Jun 22 18:37:35 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA19684 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:37:34 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id SAA02841 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:31:53 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id SAA02841 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:31:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:37596 "EHLO regulus.its.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with ESMTP id ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 00:29:48 +0200 @@ -10408,7 +10408,7 @@ From ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at Thu Jun 29 06:34:49 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA25201 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:34:44 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id GAA00379 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:35:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id GAA00379 for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 06:35:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sdexcgtw01.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (sdgtw.sd.spardat.at [172.18.1.16]) by gandalf.it-austria.net (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id MAA33950; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:33:42 +0200 @@ -10961,7 +10961,7 @@ From ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at Mon Jul 3 04:30:07 2000 Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id EAA16088 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 04:30:05 -0400 (EDT) -Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.3 $) with ESMTP id EAA19031 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 04:30:07 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id EAA19031 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 04:30:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sdexcgtw01.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (sdgtw.sd.spardat.at [172.18.1.16]) by gandalf.it-austria.net (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id KAA28416; Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:28:06 +0200 @@ -11014,3 +11014,740 @@ different Andreas +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3496@hub.org Fri Jun 16 15:55:14 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA02116 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 14:55:13 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id NAA21581 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:53:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5GHpqN06086; + Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:51:52 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5GHpcN05946 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:51:39 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07945 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:51:38 -0400 (EDT) +To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Subject: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename +Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:51:37 -0400 +Message-ID: <7942.961177897@sss.pgh.pa.us> +From: Tom Lane +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +After further thought I think there's a lot of merit in Hiroshi's +opinion that physical file names should not be tied to relation OID. +If we use a separately generated value for the file name, we can +solve a lot of problems pretty nicely by means of "table versioning". + +For example: VACUUM can't compact indexes at the moment, and what it +does do (scan the index and delete unused entries) is really slow. +The right thing to do is for it to generate an all-new index file, +but how do we do that without creating a risk of leaving the index +corrupted if we crash partway through? The answer is to build the +new index in a new physical file. But how do we install the new +file as the real index atomically, when it might span multiple +segments? If the physical file name is decoupled from the relation's +name *and* OID then there is no problem: the atomic event that makes +the new file(s) the real table contents is the commit of the new +pg_class row with the new value for the physical filename. + +Aside from possible improvements in VACUUM, this would let us do a +robust implementation of CLUSTER, and we could do the "really change +the table" variant of ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN the same way if anyone +wants to do it. + +The only cost is that we need an additional column in pg_class to +hold the physical file name. That's not so bad, especially when +you remember that we'd surely need to add something to pg_class for +tablespace support anyway. + +If we bite that bullet, then we could also do something to satisfy +Bruce about having legible file names ;-). The column in pg_class +could perfectly well be a string, not a pure number, and that means +that we can throw in the relname (truncated to fit of course). So +the thing would act a lot like the original-relname-plus-OID variant +that's been discussed so far. (Original relname because ALTER TABLE +RENAME would *not* change the physical file name. But we could +think about a form of VACUUM that creates a whole new table by +versioning, and that would presumably bring the physical name back +in sync with the logical relname.) + +Here is a sketch of a concrete proposal. I see no need to have +separate pg_class columns for tablespace and physical relname; +instead, I suggest there be a column of type NAME that is the +file pathname (relative to the database directory). Further, +instead of the existing convention of appending .N to the base +file name to make extension segment names, I propose that we +always have a segment number in the physical file name, and that +the pg_class entry be required to contain a "%d" somewhere that +indicates where. The actual filename is manufactured by + sprintf(tempbuf, value_from_pg_class_column, segment_number); + +As an example, the arrangement I was suggesting earlier today +about segments in different subdirectories of a tablespace +could be implemented by assigning physical filenames like + + tablespace/%d/12345_relname + +where the 12345 is a value generated separately from the table's OID. +(We would still use the OID counter to produce these numbers, and +in fact there's no reason not to use the table's OID as the initial +unique ID for the physical filename. The point is just that the +physical filename doesn't have to remain forever equal to the +relation's OID.) + +If we use type NAME for this string then the tablespace part of the path +would have to be kept to no more than ~ 15 characters, but that seems +workable enough. (Anybody who really didn't like that could recompile +with larger NAMEDATALEN. Doesn't seem worth inventing a separate type.) + +As Hiroshi pointed out, one of the best aspects of this approach +is that the physical table layout policy doesn't have to be hard-wired +into low-level file access routines. The low-level routines don't +need to know much of anything about the format of the pathname, +they just stuff in the right segment number and use the name. The +layout policy need only be known to one single routine that generates +the strings that go into pg_class. So it'd be really easy to change. + +One thing we'd have to work out is that the critical system tables +(eg, pg_class itself, as well as its indexes) would have to have +predictable physical names. Otherwise there's no way for a new +backend to bootstrap itself up ... it can't very well read pg_class +to find out where pg_class is. A brute-force solution is to forbid +reversioning of the critical tables, but I suspect we can find a +less restrictive answer. + +This seems like it'd satisfy all the concerns that have been raised. +Comments? + + regards, tom lane + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3524@hub.org Fri Jun 16 22:30:59 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA07796 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:30:58 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id VAA26393 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:16:37 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5H1EeM94683; + Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:14:40 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5H1D0M94365 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:13:00 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA10209; + Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:12:30 -0400 (EDT) +To: Chris Bitmead +cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org +Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename +In-reply-to: <394ACB42.C87C59B8@bitmead.com> +References: <7942.961177897@sss.pgh.pa.us> <394ACB42.C87C59B8@bitmead.com> +Comments: In-reply-to Chris Bitmead + message dated "Sat, 17 Jun 2000 10:50:10 +1000" +Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:12:29 -0400 +Message-ID: <10206.961204349@sss.pgh.pa.us> +From: Tom Lane +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +Chris Bitmead writes: +> At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in +> pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the +> vacuum method. + +Hmm ... maybe, but it doesn't seem worth the portability headache to +me. We do have an NT port that we don't want to break, and I don't +think RENAME TABLE is worth the trouble of testing/supporting two +implementations. + +Even on Unix, aren't there filesystems that don't do hard links? +Not that I'd recommend running Postgres on such a volume, but... + + regards, tom lane + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3525@hub.org Sat Jun 17 07:01:03 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id GAA22194 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 06:01:02 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id FAA21836 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:39:21 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5H9bSM88777; + Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:37:28 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5H9anM88603 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 05:36:49 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from mcadnote1 (ppm130.noc.fukui.nsk.ne.jp [210.161.188.49]) + by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP + id SAA08384; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:36:00 +0900 +From: "Hiroshi Inoue" +To: "Tom Lane" +Cc: +Subject: RE: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename +Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:38:53 +0900 +Message-ID: +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset="iso-2022-jp" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Priority: 3 (Normal) +X-MSMail-Priority: Normal +X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) +In-Reply-To: <7942.961177897@sss.pgh.pa.us> +X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 +Importance: Normal +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +> -----Original Message----- +> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On +> Behalf Of Tom Lane +> +> After further thought I think there's a lot of merit in Hiroshi's +> opinion that physical file names should not be tied to relation OID. +> If we use a separately generated value for the file name, we can +> solve a lot of problems pretty nicely by means of "table versioning". +> +> For example: VACUUM can't compact indexes at the moment, and what it +> does do (scan the index and delete unused entries) is really slow. +> The right thing to do is for it to generate an all-new index file, +> but how do we do that without creating a risk of leaving the index +> corrupted if we crash partway through? The answer is to build the +> new index in a new physical file. But how do we install the new +> file as the real index atomically, when it might span multiple +> segments? If the physical file name is decoupled from the relation's +> name *and* OID then there is no problem: the atomic event that makes +> the new file(s) the real table contents is the commit of the new +> pg_class row with the new value for the physical filename. +> +> Aside from possible improvements in VACUUM, this would let us do a +> robust implementation of CLUSTER, and we could do the "really change +> the table" variant of ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN the same way if anyone +> wants to do it. +> + +Yes,I've wondered how do we implement column_is_really_dropped +ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN feature without this kind of mechanism. + +> The only cost is that we need an additional column in pg_class to +> hold the physical file name. That's not so bad, especially when +> you remember that we'd surely need to add something to pg_class for +> tablespace support anyway. +> +> If we bite that bullet, then we could also do something to satisfy +> Bruce about having legible file names ;-). The column in pg_class +> could perfectly well be a string, not a pure number, and that means +> that we can throw in the relname (truncated to fit of course). So +> the thing would act a lot like the original-relname-plus-OID variant +> that's been discussed so far. (Original relname because ALTER TABLE +> RENAME would *not* change the physical file name. But we could +> think about a form of VACUUM that creates a whole new table by +> versioning, and that would presumably bring the physical name back +> in sync with the logical relname.) +> +> As Hiroshi pointed out, one of the best aspects of this approach +> is that the physical table layout policy doesn't have to be hard-wired +> into low-level file access routines. The low-level routines don't +> need to know much of anything about the format of the pathname, +> they just stuff in the right segment number and use the name. The +> layout policy need only be known to one single routine that generates +> the strings that go into pg_class. So it'd be really easy to change. +> + +Ross's approach is fundamentally same though he is using relname+OID +naming rule. I've said his trial is most practical one. + +> One thing we'd have to work out is that the critical system tables +> (eg, pg_class itself, as well as its indexes) would have to have +> predictable physical names. + +The only limitation of the relation filename is the uniqueness. +So it doesn't introduce any inconsistency that system tables +have fixed name. +As for system relations it wouldn't be so bad because CLUSTER/ +ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN ... would be unnecessary(maybe). +But as for system indexes,it is preferable that VACUUM/REINDEX +could rebuild them safely. System indexes never shrink currently. + +Regards. + +Hiroshi Inoue +Inoue@tpf.co.jp + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3529@hub.org Sat Jun 17 10:01:24 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA24004 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 09:01:23 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id IAA28633 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:57:47 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5HCtxM77095; + Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:55:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5HCtoM77026 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 08:55:50 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:57716 "EHLO + regulus.its.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with ESMTP + id ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 14:55:25 +0200 +Received: from peter (helo=localhost) + by regulus.its.uu.se with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #2) + id 133IET-0002Y3-00; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:01:53 +0200 +Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 15:01:53 +0200 (CEST) +From: Peter Eisentraut +To: Tom Lane +cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org +Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated + filename +In-Reply-To: <7942.961177897@sss.pgh.pa.us> +Message-ID: +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +Tom Lane writes: + +> tablespace/%d/12345_relname + +Throwing table spaces and relation names into one pot doesn't excite me +very much. For example, before long people will want to + +* Query what tables are in what space (without using string operations) +Consider for example creating a new table and choosing where to put it. + +* Rename table spaces + +* Assign attributes of some sort to table spaces (permissions, etc.) + +* Use table space names with more than 15 characters. :) + +Somehow table spaces need to be catalogued. You could still make the +physical file name 'tablespaceoid/rest' without actually having to look up +anything, although that depends on your symlink idea which is still under +discussion. + +Then, why are all nth segments of tables in one directory in that +proposal? + +Also, you said before that an old relname (after rename) is worse than +none at all. I couldn't agree more. + +Why not use OID.[SEGMENT.]VERSION for the physical relname (different +order possible)? That way you at least have some guaranteed correspondence +between files and tables. Version could probably be an INT2, so you save +some space. + + +-- +Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 +peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala +http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden + + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3534@hub.org Sat Jun 17 13:31:11 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA02801 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:31:10 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id MAA07848 for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:27:14 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5HGPJM95074; + Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:25:19 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.166.2]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5HGP1M94990 + for ; Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:25:01 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18939; + Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:24:56 -0400 (EDT) +To: "Hiroshi Inoue" +cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org +Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename +In-reply-to: +References: +Comments: In-reply-to "Hiroshi Inoue" + message dated "Sat, 17 Jun 2000 18:38:53 +0900" +Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 12:24:56 -0400 +Message-ID: <18936.961259096@sss.pgh.pa.us> +From: Tom Lane +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +"Hiroshi Inoue" writes: +>> One thing we'd have to work out is that the critical system tables +>> (eg, pg_class itself, as well as its indexes) would have to have +>> predictable physical names. + +> The only limitation of the relation filename is the uniqueness. +> So it doesn't introduce any inconsistency that system tables +> have fixed name. +> As for system relations it wouldn't be so bad because CLUSTER/ +> ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN ... would be unnecessary(maybe). +> But as for system indexes,it is preferable that VACUUM/REINDEX +> could rebuild them safely. System indexes never shrink currently. + +Right, it's the index-shrinking business that has me worried. +Most of the other reasons for swapping in a new file don't apply +to system tables, but that one does. + +One possibility is to say that system *tables* can't be reversioned +(at least not the critical ones) but system *indexes* can be. +Then we'd have to use your ignore-system-indexes stuff during backend +startup, until we'd found out where the indexes are. Might be too big +a time penalty however... not sure. Shared cache inval of a system +index could be a little tricky too; I don't think the catcache routines +are prepared to fall back to non-index scan are they? + +On the whole it might be better to cheat by using a side data structure +like the pg_internal.init file, that a backend could consult to find out +where the indexes are now. + + regards, tom lane + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3553@hub.org Sun Jun 18 18:31:03 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA08740 + for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:31:02 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id RAA18332 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:21:51 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5ILJcM11720; + Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:19:38 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5ILILM09628 + for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:18:21 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:40239 "EHLO + regulus.its.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with ESMTP + id ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:17:49 +0200 +Received: from peter (helo=localhost) + by regulus.its.uu.se with local-esmtp (Exim 3.02 #2) + id 133mYM-0000Ns-00; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:24:26 +0200 +Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 23:24:26 +0200 (CEST) +From: Peter Eisentraut +To: Tom Lane +cc: PostgreSQL Development +Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated + filename +In-Reply-To: <19045.961260445@sss.pgh.pa.us> +Message-ID: +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +Tom Lane writes: + +> I don't think it's a good idea to have to consult pg_tablespace to find +> out where a table actually is --- I think the pathname (or smgr access +> token as Ross would call it ;-)) ought to be determinable from just the +> pg_class entry. + +That's why I suggested the table space oid. That would be readily +available from pg_class. + + +> Tablespaces can have logical names stored in pg_tablespace; they just +> can't contribute more than a dozen or so characters to file pathnames +> under the implementation I'm proposing. That doesn't seem too +> unreasonable; the pathname part can be some sort of abbreviated name. + +Since the abbreviated name is really only used internally it might as well +be the oid. Otherwise you create a weird functional dependency like the +pg_shadow.usesysid field that's just an extra layer of maintenance. + + +> this implementation mechanism will support either policy choice --- +> original relname in the filename, or just a numeric ID for the +> filename + +But when you look at a file name `12345_accounts_recei' you know neither + +* whether the table name was really `accounts_recei' or whether the name +was truncated + +* whether the table still has that name, whatever it was + +* what table this is at all + +So in the aggregate you really know less than nothing. :-) + + +> > Why not use OID.[SEGMENT.]VERSION for the physical relname (different +> > order possible)? +> +> Doesn't give you a manageable way to split segments across different +> disks. + +Okay, so maybe ${base}/TABLESPACEOID/SEGMENT/RELOID.VERSION. + +This doesn't need any catalog lookup outside of pg_class, yet it's still +easy to resolve to human-readable names by simple admin tools (SELECT * +FROM pg_foo WHERE oid = xxx). VERSION would be unique within a conceptual +relation, so you could even see how many times the relation was altered in +major ways (kind of). + + +-- +Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115 +peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala +http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden + + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3561@hub.org Sun Jun 18 21:31:03 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA20523 + for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:31:02 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA25719 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:26:49 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5J0OLM53050; + Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:24:21 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5J0NmM50883 + for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:23:49 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) + by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP + id JAA09003; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:22:45 +0900 +From: "Hiroshi Inoue" +To: "Chris Bitmead" , "Tom Lane" +Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" , +Subject: RE: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename +Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:24:56 +0900 +Message-ID: <000901bfd984$cbf1dfc0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset="ISO-8859-1" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Priority: 3 (Normal) +X-MSMail-Priority: Normal +X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 +In-Reply-To: <394C20C6.9580A8A9@bitmead.com> +X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 +Importance: Normal +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +> -----Original Message----- +> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On +> Behalf Of Chris Bitmead +> +> Tom Lane wrote: +> +> > > Also, you said before that an old relname (after rename) is worse than +> > > none at all. I couldn't agree more. +> > +> > I'm not the one who wants relnames in the physical names ;-). However, +> > this implementation mechanism will support either policy choice --- +> > original relname in the filename, or just a numeric ID for the filename +> > --- and that seems like a good sign to me. +> > +> > > Why not use OID.[SEGMENT.]VERSION for the physical relname (different +> > > order possible)? +> +> Unless VERSION is globally unique like an oid is, having RELNAME.VERSION +> would be a problem if you created a table with the same name as a +> recently renamed table. +> + +In my proposal(relname+unique-id),the unique-id is globally unique +and relname is only for dba's convenience. I've said many times that +we should be free from the rule of file naming as far as possible. +I myself don't mind the name of relation files except that they should +be globally unique. I had to propose my opinion for file naming +because people have been so enthusiastic about globally_not_unique +file naming. + +Regards. + +Hiroshi Inoue +Inoue@tpf.co.jp + + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3523@hub.org Fri Jun 16 22:01:00 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA07568 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:00:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id UAA25354 for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:54:02 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5H0q3M53458; + Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:52:03 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from tech.com.au (IDENT:root@techpt.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.75.122]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5H0oRM47761 + for ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 20:50:28 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from bitmead.com (IDENT:chris@tardis [203.41.180.243]) + by tech.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21482; + Sat, 17 Jun 2000 10:50:14 +1000 +Message-ID: <394ACB42.C87C59B8@bitmead.com> +Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2000 10:50:10 +1000 +From: Chris Bitmead +X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686) +X-Accept-Language: en +MIME-Version: 1.0 +To: Tom Lane +CC: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org +Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated + filename +References: <7942.961177897@sss.pgh.pa.us> +Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: ORr + +Tom Lane wrote: + So +> the thing would act a lot like the original-relname-plus-OID variant +> that's been discussed so far. (Original relname because ALTER TABLE +> RENAME would *not* change the physical file name. But we could +> think about a form of VACUUM that creates a whole new table by +> versioning, and that would presumably bring the physical name back +> in sync with the logical relname.) + +At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in +pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the +vacuum method. + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3576@hub.org Mon Jun 19 01:58:35 2000 +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA00789 + for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:58:34 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5J4qfM87650; + Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:52:41 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sd.tpf.co.jp (sd.tpf.co.jp [210.161.239.34]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5J4oUM77400 + for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 00:50:30 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from cadzone ([126.0.1.40] (may be forged)) + by sd.tpf.co.jp (2.5 Build 2640 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with SMTP + id NAA09265; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:50:22 +0900 +From: "Hiroshi Inoue" +To: "Peter Eisentraut" +Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" , + "Tom Lane" +Subject: RE: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generatedfilename +Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 13:52:34 +0900 +Message-ID: <001201bfd9aa$2f1c1320$2801007e@tpf.co.jp> +MIME-Version: 1.0 +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset="ISO-8859-1" +Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit +X-Priority: 3 (Normal) +X-MSMail-Priority: Normal +X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 +In-Reply-To: +X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 +Importance: Normal +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + +> -----Original Message----- +> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On +> Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut +> +> Tom Lane writes: +> +> > I don't think it's a good idea to have to consult pg_tablespace to find +> > out where a table actually is --- I think the pathname (or smgr access +> > token as Ross would call it ;-)) ought to be determinable from just the +> > pg_class entry. +> +> That's why I suggested the table space oid. That would be readily +> available from pg_class. +> + +It seems to me that the following 1)2) has always been mixed up. +IMHO,they should be distinguished clearly. + +1) Where the table is stored + Currently PostgreSQL relies on relname -> filename mapping + rule to access *existent* relations and doesn't have this + information in its database. Our(Tom,Ross,me) proposal is to + keep the information(token) in pg_class and provide a standard + transactional control mechanism for the change of table file + allocation. By doing it we would be able to be free from table + allocation(naming) rule. + Isn't it a kind of thing why we haven't had it from the first ? + +2) Where to store the table + Yes,TABLE(DATA)SPACE should encapsulate this concept. + +I want the decision about 1) first. Ross has already tried it without +2). + +Comments ? + +As for 2) every one seems to have each opinion and the discussion +has always been divergent. Please don't discard 1) together. + +Regards. + +Hiroshi Inoue +Inoue@tpf.co.jp + + +From pgsql-hackers-owner+M3591@hub.org Mon Jun 19 11:01:19 2000 +Received: from renoir.op.net (root@renoir.op.net [207.29.195.4]) + by candle.pha.pa.us (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA21409 + for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 10:01:18 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (root@hub.org [216.126.84.1]) by renoir.op.net (o1/$Revision: 1.4 $) with ESMTP id JAA05383 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:56:59 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from hub.org (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id e5JDsVM91574; + Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:54:31 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from gandalf.it-austria.net (gandalf.it-austria.net [213.150.1.65]) + by hub.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id e5JDldM77267 + for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 09:48:05 -0400 (EDT) +Received: from sdexcgtw01.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at (sdgtw.sd.spardat.at [172.18.1.16]) + by gandalf.it-austria.net (xxx/xxx) with ESMTP id PAA80686; + Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:46:24 +0200 +Received: by sdexcgtw01.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) + id ; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:46:24 +0200 +Message-ID: <219F68D65015D011A8E000006F8590C605BA5978@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at> +From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB +To: "'Tom Lane'" , Peter Eisentraut +Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Subject: AW: [HACKERS] OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated + filename +Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 15:46:22 +0200 +MIME-Version: 1.0 +X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) +Content-Type: text/plain; + charset="iso-8859-1" +X-Mailing-List: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org +Precedence: bulk +Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org +Status: OR + + +> It's better than *all* segments of tables in one directory, which is +> what you get if the segment number is just a component of a flat file +> name. We have to have a better answer than that for people who need +> to cope with tables bigger than a disk. Perhaps someone can +> think of a +> better answer than subdirectory-per-segment-number, but I think that +> will work well enough; and it doesn't add any complexity for file +> access. + +I do not see this connection between a filesystem and a disk ? +Modern systems have the ability to join more than one disk into +one filesystem. + +Also if we think about separating large tables into smaller parts +we imho want something where the optimizer has knowledge +what data it finds in what part of the table. + +Andreas +