Fix code so that we recover cleanly if there are no free semaphores
available in freeSemMap. As noted by Tatsuo, this is now a likely scenario for detecting MaxBackends-exceeded; if MaxBackends is a multiple of PROC_NSEMS_PER_SET then we will fail here and not in sinval.c. The cleanup path did not work correctly before, anyway.
This commit is contained in:
parent
29c22eec8c
commit
763554393a
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.105 2001/09/04 02:26:57 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.106 2001/09/04 21:42:17 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -186,6 +186,17 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
unsigned long location,
|
||||
myOffset;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* ProcStructLock protects the freelist of PROC entries and the map
|
||||
* of free semaphores. Note that when we acquire it here, we do not
|
||||
* have a PROC entry and so the ownership of the spinlock is not
|
||||
* recorded anywhere; even if it was, until we register ProcKill as
|
||||
* an on_shmem_exit callback, there is no exit hook that will cause
|
||||
* owned spinlocks to be released. Upshot: during the first part of
|
||||
* this routine, be careful to release the lock manually before any
|
||||
* elog(), else you'll have a stuck spinlock to add to your woes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
SpinAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* attach to the ProcGlobal structure */
|
||||
@ -194,13 +205,14 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
if (!found)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* this should not happen. InitProcGlobal() is called before this. */
|
||||
SpinRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
elog(STOP, "InitProcess: Proc Header uninitialized");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (MyProc != NULL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
SpinRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "ProcInit: you already exist");
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "InitProcess: you already exist");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* try to get a proc struct from the free list first */
|
||||
@ -214,14 +226,12 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* have to allocate one. We can't use the normal shmem index
|
||||
* table mechanism because the proc structure is stored by PID
|
||||
* instead of by a global name (need to look it up by PID when we
|
||||
* cleanup dead processes).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
MyProc = (PROC *) ShmemAlloc(sizeof(PROC));
|
||||
if (!MyProc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -231,7 +241,22 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* zero out the spin lock counts and set the sLocks field for
|
||||
* Initialize all fields of MyProc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SHMQueueElemInit(&(MyProc->links));
|
||||
MyProc->sem.semId = -1; /* no wait-semaphore acquired yet */
|
||||
MyProc->sem.semNum = -1;
|
||||
MyProc->errType = STATUS_OK;
|
||||
MyProc->xid = InvalidTransactionId;
|
||||
MyProc->xmin = InvalidTransactionId;
|
||||
MyProc->logRec.xrecoff = 0;
|
||||
MyProc->waitLock = NULL;
|
||||
MyProc->waitHolder = NULL;
|
||||
MyProc->pid = MyProcPid;
|
||||
MyProc->databaseId = MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
SHMQueueInit(&(MyProc->procHolders));
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Zero out the spin lock counts and set the sLocks field for
|
||||
* ProcStructLock to 1 as we have acquired this spinlock above but
|
||||
* didn't record it since we didn't have MyProc until now.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -239,36 +264,9 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
MyProc->sLocks[ProcStructLock] = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set up a wait-semaphore for the proc.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IsUnderPostmaster)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum(&MyProc->sem.semId, &MyProc->sem.semNum);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* we might be reusing a semaphore that belongs to a dead backend.
|
||||
* So be careful and reinitialize its value here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ZeroProcSemaphore(MyProc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
MyProc->sem.semId = -1;
|
||||
MyProc->sem.semNum = -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
SHMQueueElemInit(&(MyProc->links));
|
||||
MyProc->errType = STATUS_OK;
|
||||
MyProc->pid = MyProcPid;
|
||||
MyProc->databaseId = MyDatabaseId;
|
||||
MyProc->xid = InvalidTransactionId;
|
||||
MyProc->xmin = InvalidTransactionId;
|
||||
MyProc->waitLock = NULL;
|
||||
MyProc->waitHolder = NULL;
|
||||
SHMQueueInit(&(MyProc->procHolders));
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Release the lock.
|
||||
* Release the lock while accessing shmem index; we still haven't
|
||||
* installed ProcKill and so we don't want to hold lock if there's
|
||||
* an error.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SpinRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -283,10 +281,28 @@ InitProcess(void)
|
||||
elog(STOP, "InitProcess: ShmemPID table broken");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Arrange to clean up at backend exit.
|
||||
* Arrange to clean up at backend exit. Once we do this, owned
|
||||
* spinlocks will be released on exit, and so we can be a lot less
|
||||
* tense about errors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
on_shmem_exit(ProcKill, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set up a wait-semaphore for the proc. (Do this last so that we
|
||||
* can rely on ProcKill to clean up if it fails.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IsUnderPostmaster)
|
||||
{
|
||||
SpinAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum(&MyProc->sem.semId, &MyProc->sem.semNum);
|
||||
SpinRelease(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We might be reusing a semaphore that belongs to a dead backend.
|
||||
* So be careful and reinitialize its value here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ZeroProcSemaphore(MyProc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now that we have a PROC, we could try to acquire locks, so
|
||||
* initialize the deadlock checker.
|
||||
@ -425,8 +441,9 @@ ProcKill(void)
|
||||
|
||||
SpinAcquire(ProcStructLock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Free up my wait semaphore */
|
||||
ProcFreeSem(MyProc->sem.semId, MyProc->sem.semNum);
|
||||
/* Free up my wait semaphore, if I got one */
|
||||
if (MyProc->sem.semId >= 0)
|
||||
ProcFreeSem(MyProc->sem.semId, MyProc->sem.semNum);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Add PROC struct to freelist so space can be recycled in future */
|
||||
MyProc->links.next = ProcGlobal->freeProcs;
|
||||
@ -993,10 +1010,7 @@ ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum(IpcSemaphoreId *semId, int *semNum)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((freeSemMap[i] & mask) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* a free semaphore found. Mark it as allocated.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/* A free semaphore found. Mark it as allocated. */
|
||||
freeSemMap[i] |= mask;
|
||||
|
||||
*semId = procSemIds[i];
|
||||
@ -1007,8 +1021,13 @@ ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum(IpcSemaphoreId *semId, int *semNum)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if we reach here, all the semaphores are in use. */
|
||||
elog(ERROR, "ProcGetNewSemIdAndNum: cannot allocate a free semaphore");
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we reach here, all the semaphores are in use. This is one of the
|
||||
* possible places to detect "too many backends", so give the standard
|
||||
* error message. (Whether we detect it here or in sinval.c depends on
|
||||
* whether MaxBackends is a multiple of PROC_NSEMS_PER_SET.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
elog(FATAL, "Sorry, too many clients already");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user