Minor tweak to make rowtypes regression test run faster. We don't
currently have any better strategy for this query than re-running the sub-select over and over; it seems unlikely that doing so 10000 times is a more useful test than doing it a few dozen times.
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e1664beaf
commit
6be40def01
src/test/regress
@ -206,7 +206,8 @@ LINE 1: select ROW('ABC','DEF') ~~ ROW('DEF','ABC') as fail;
|
|||||||
HINT: Row comparison operators must be associated with btree operator families.
|
HINT: Row comparison operators must be associated with btree operator families.
|
||||||
-- Check row comparison with a subselect
|
-- Check row comparison with a subselect
|
||||||
select unique1, unique2 from tenk1
|
select unique1, unique2 from tenk1
|
||||||
where (unique1, unique2) < any (select ten, ten from tenk1 where hundred < 3);
|
where (unique1, unique2) < any (select ten, ten from tenk1 where hundred < 3)
|
||||||
|
and unique1 <= 20;
|
||||||
unique1 | unique2
|
unique1 | unique2
|
||||||
---------+---------
|
---------+---------
|
||||||
1 | 2838
|
1 | 2838
|
||||||
|
@ -100,7 +100,8 @@ select ROW('ABC','DEF') ~~ ROW('DEF','ABC') as fail;
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
-- Check row comparison with a subselect
|
-- Check row comparison with a subselect
|
||||||
select unique1, unique2 from tenk1
|
select unique1, unique2 from tenk1
|
||||||
where (unique1, unique2) < any (select ten, ten from tenk1 where hundred < 3);
|
where (unique1, unique2) < any (select ten, ten from tenk1 where hundred < 3)
|
||||||
|
and unique1 <= 20;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
-- Also check row comparison with an indexable condition
|
-- Also check row comparison with an indexable condition
|
||||||
select thousand, tenthous from tenk1
|
select thousand, tenthous from tenk1
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user