From 6ac763f19a6556c43933c5252065a5c81cde094d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:28:55 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix missing words in comment. Introduced by commit c3928b467a, backpatch to v14 like that one. Author: Amit Langote Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+HiwqFQgNLS6VGntMcuJV6erBFV425xA6wBVnY=41GK4zC0Bw@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/executor/nodeForeignscan.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeForeignscan.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeForeignscan.c index ad9edd26f1..1abd906b16 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeForeignscan.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeForeignscan.c @@ -265,8 +265,9 @@ ExecInitForeignScan(ForeignScan *node, EState *estate, int eflags) { /* * Direct modifications cannot be re-evaluated by EvalPlanQual, so - * don't bother preparing the FDW. There can ForeignScan nodes in the - * EvalPlanQual subtree, but ExecForeignScan should never be called. + * don't bother preparing the FDW. There can be ForeignScan nodes in + * the EvalPlanQual subtree, but ExecForeignScan should never be + * called on them when EvalPlanQual is active. */ if (estate->es_epq_active == NULL) fdwroutine->BeginDirectModify(scanstate, eflags);