From 441bbd298888fe751a01b6c74cc53f2e7b223fa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 17:07:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] doc: correct reference to pg_relation in comment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reported-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87sf9apnr0.fsf@wibble.ilmari.org Backpatch-through: master --- src/backend/storage/large_object/inv_api.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/large_object/inv_api.c b/src/backend/storage/large_object/inv_api.c index 84e543e731..cc9c335a92 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/large_object/inv_api.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/large_object/inv_api.c @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ bool lo_compat_privileges; /* - * All accesses to pg_largeobject and its index make use of a single Relation - * reference, so that we only need to open pg_relation once per transaction. - * To avoid problems when the first such reference occurs inside a - * subtransaction, we execute a slightly klugy maneuver to assign ownership of - * the Relation reference to TopTransactionResourceOwner. + * All accesses to pg_largeobject and its index make use of a single + * Relation reference. To guarantee that the relcache entry remains + * in the cache, on the first reference inside a subtransaction, we + * execute a slightly klugy maneuver to assign ownership of the + * Relation reference to TopTransactionResourceOwner. */ static Relation lo_heap_r = NULL; static Relation lo_index_r = NULL;