Provide a way to predefine LWLock tranche IDs.
It's a bit cumbersome to use LWLockNewTrancheId(), because the returned value needs to be shared between backends so that each backend can call LWLockRegisterTranche() with the correct ID. So, for built-in tranches, use a hard-coded value instead. This is motivated by an upcoming patch adding further built-in tranches. Andres Freund and Robert Haas
This commit is contained in:
parent
43cd468cf0
commit
3fed417452
@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ typedef struct XLogCtlInsert
|
||||
*/
|
||||
WALInsertLockPadded *WALInsertLocks;
|
||||
LWLockTranche WALInsertLockTranche;
|
||||
int WALInsertLockTrancheId;
|
||||
} XLogCtlInsert;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -4653,7 +4652,7 @@ XLOGShmemInit(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize local copy of WALInsertLocks and register the tranche */
|
||||
WALInsertLocks = XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLocks;
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTrancheId,
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(LWTRANCHE_WAL_INSERT,
|
||||
&XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -4677,17 +4676,14 @@ XLOGShmemInit(void)
|
||||
(WALInsertLockPadded *) allocptr;
|
||||
allocptr += sizeof(WALInsertLockPadded) * NUM_XLOGINSERT_LOCKS;
|
||||
|
||||
XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTrancheId = LWLockNewTrancheId();
|
||||
|
||||
XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche.name = "WALInsertLocks";
|
||||
XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche.array_base = WALInsertLocks;
|
||||
XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche.array_stride = sizeof(WALInsertLockPadded);
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTrancheId, &XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche);
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(LWTRANCHE_WAL_INSERT, &XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTranche);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NUM_XLOGINSERT_LOCKS; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LWLockInitialize(&WALInsertLocks[i].l.lock,
|
||||
XLogCtl->Insert.WALInsertLockTrancheId);
|
||||
LWLockInitialize(&WALInsertLocks[i].l.lock, LWTRANCHE_WAL_INSERT);
|
||||
WALInsertLocks[i].l.insertingAt = InvalidXLogRecPtr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ CreateLWLocks(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize all LWLocks in main array */
|
||||
for (id = 0, lock = MainLWLockArray; id < numLocks; id++, lock++)
|
||||
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock, 0);
|
||||
LWLockInitialize(&lock->lock, LWTRANCHE_MAIN);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Initialize the dynamic-allocation counters, which are stored just
|
||||
@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ CreateLWLocks(void)
|
||||
LWLockCounter = (int *) ((char *) MainLWLockArray - 3 * sizeof(int));
|
||||
LWLockCounter[0] = NUM_FIXED_LWLOCKS;
|
||||
LWLockCounter[1] = numLocks;
|
||||
LWLockCounter[2] = 1; /* 0 is the main array */
|
||||
LWLockCounter[2] = LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (LWLockTrancheArray == NULL)
|
||||
@ -466,12 +466,13 @@ CreateLWLocks(void)
|
||||
LWLockTrancheArray = (LWLockTranche **)
|
||||
MemoryContextAlloc(TopMemoryContext,
|
||||
LWLockTranchesAllocated * sizeof(LWLockTranche *));
|
||||
Assert(LWLockTranchesAllocated >= LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
MainLWLockTranche.name = "main";
|
||||
MainLWLockTranche.array_base = MainLWLockArray;
|
||||
MainLWLockTranche.array_stride = sizeof(LWLockPadded);
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(0, &MainLWLockTranche);
|
||||
LWLockRegisterTranche(LWTRANCHE_MAIN, &MainLWLockTranche);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -176,6 +176,17 @@ extern int LWLockNewTrancheId(void);
|
||||
extern void LWLockRegisterTranche(int tranche_id, LWLockTranche *tranche);
|
||||
extern void LWLockInitialize(LWLock *lock, int tranche_id);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We reserve a few predefined tranche IDs. A call to LWLockNewTrancheId
|
||||
* will never return a value less than LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
typedef enum BuiltinTrancheIds
|
||||
{
|
||||
LWTRANCHE_MAIN,
|
||||
LWTRANCHE_WAL_INSERT,
|
||||
LWTRANCHE_FIRST_USER_DEFINED
|
||||
} BuiltinTrancheIds;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prior to PostgreSQL 9.4, we used an enum type called LWLockId to refer
|
||||
* to LWLocks. New code should instead use LWLock *. However, for the
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user