Updates from Simon Riggs:
< that can spam more than one table. > that can span more than one table. 239c239 < rather than just col1 > rather than just col1; also called skip-scanning. 641c641,642 < * Add free-behind capability for large sequential scans [fadvise] > * Allow free-behind capability for large sequential scans, perhaps using > posix_fadvise() [fadvise]
This commit is contained in:
parent
c894e7e8e0
commit
2c793d1c87
9
doc/TODO
9
doc/TODO
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ TODO list for PostgreSQL
|
||||
Bracketed items "[]" have more detail.
|
||||
|
||||
Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us)
|
||||
Last updated: Thu Nov 4 11:19:28 EST 2004
|
||||
Last updated: Thu Nov 4 11:49:35 EST 2004
|
||||
|
||||
The most recent version of this document can be viewed at the PostgreSQL web
|
||||
site, http://www.PostgreSQL.org.
|
||||
@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ Indexes
|
||||
(dup) should fail [inheritance]
|
||||
|
||||
The main difficulty with this item is the problem of creating an index
|
||||
that can spam more than one table.
|
||||
that can span more than one table.
|
||||
|
||||
* Add UNIQUE capability to non-btree indexes
|
||||
* Add rtree index support for line, lseg, path, point
|
||||
@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ Indexes
|
||||
|
||||
For an index on col1,col2,col3, and a WHERE clause of col1 = 5 and
|
||||
col3 = 9, spin though the index checking for col1 and col3 matches,
|
||||
rather than just col1
|
||||
rather than just col1; also called skip-scanning.
|
||||
|
||||
* Prevent index uniqueness checks when UPDATE does not modify the column
|
||||
|
||||
@ -638,7 +638,8 @@ Fsync
|
||||
|
||||
Cache
|
||||
=====
|
||||
* Add free-behind capability for large sequential scans [fadvise]
|
||||
* Allow free-behind capability for large sequential scans, perhaps using
|
||||
posix_fadvise() [fadvise]
|
||||
* Consider use of open/fcntl(O_DIRECT) to minimize OS caching
|
||||
* Cache last known per-tuple offsets to speed long tuple access
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user