More HA wording improvements.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b035722f29
commit
2a55984162
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml,v 1.13 2006/11/22 18:14:26 momjian Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml,v 1.14 2006/11/22 18:15:34 momjian Exp $ -->
|
||||
|
||||
<chapter id="high-availability">
|
||||
<title>High Availability and Load Balancing</title>
|
||||
@ -226,7 +226,6 @@ protocol to make nodes agree on a serializable transactional order.
|
||||
server works independently, and periodically communicates with
|
||||
the other servers to identify conflicting transactions. The
|
||||
conflicts can be resolved by users or conflict resolution rules.
|
||||
rules.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
@ -252,12 +251,14 @@ protocol to make nodes agree on a serializable transactional order.
|
||||
<listitem>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Many of the above solutions allow multiple servers handle multiple sessions, but none allow a single query to use
|
||||
multiple server to complete fas to This allows multiple servers to work concurrently on a single
|
||||
query. One possible way this could work is for the data to be
|
||||
split among servers and for each server to execute its part of
|
||||
the query and results sent to a central server to be combined
|
||||
and returned to the user. Pgpool-II has this capability.
|
||||
Many of the above solutions allow multiple servers to handle
|
||||
multiple queries, but none allow a single query to use multiple
|
||||
servers to complete faster. This solution allows multiple
|
||||
servers to work concurrently on a single query. This is usually
|
||||
accomplished by splitting the data among servers and having
|
||||
each server execute its part of the query and return results
|
||||
to a central server where they are combined and returned to
|
||||
the user. Pgpool-II has this capability.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</listitem>
|
||||
</varlistentry>
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user