Doc: explain how to test ADMIN privilege with pg_has_role().
This has always been possible, but the syntax is a bit obscure, and our user-facing docs were not very helpful. Spell it out more clearly. Per complaint from Dominique Devienne. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFCRh-8JNEy+dV4SXFOrWca50u+d=--TO4cq=+ac1oBtfJy4AA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
785c53d91d
commit
23d4439732
@ -23030,6 +23030,10 @@ SELECT has_function_privilege('joeuser', 'myfunc(int, text)', 'execute');
|
||||
the role (that is, the right to do <command>SET ROLE</command>), while
|
||||
<literal>USAGE</literal> denotes whether the privileges of the role
|
||||
are immediately available without doing <command>SET ROLE</command>.
|
||||
<literal>WITH ADMIN OPTION</literal> or <literal>WITH GRANT
|
||||
OPTION</literal> can be added to either of these privilege types to
|
||||
test whether the <literal>ADMIN</literal> privilege is held (all
|
||||
four spellings test the same thing).
|
||||
This function does not allow the special case of
|
||||
setting <parameter>user</parameter> to <literal>public</literal>,
|
||||
because the PUBLIC pseudo-role can never be a member of real roles.
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user