Fix bug introduced by microvacuum for GiST
Commit 013ebc0a7b7ea9c1b1ab7a3d4dd75ea121ea8ba7 introduces microvacuum for GiST, deletetion of tuple marked LP_DEAD uses IndexPageMultiDelete while recovery code uses IndexPageTupleDelete in loop. This causes a difference in offset numbers of tuples to delete. Patch introduces usage of IndexPageMultiDelete in GiST except gistplacetopage() where only one tuple is deleted at once. That also slightly improve performance, because IndexPageMultiDelete is more effective. Patch changes WAL format, so bump wal page magic. Bug report from Jeff Janes Diagnostic and patch by Anastasia Lubennikova and me
This commit is contained in:
parent
7aea8e4f2d
commit
22f519c92a
@ -466,6 +466,11 @@ gistplacetopage(Relation rel, Size freespace, GISTSTATE *giststate,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
START_CRIT_SECTION();
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* While we delete only one tuple at once we could mix calls
|
||||
* PageIndexTupleDelete() here and PageIndexMultiDelete() in
|
||||
* gistRedoPageUpdateRecord()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (OffsetNumberIsValid(oldoffnum))
|
||||
PageIndexTupleDelete(page, oldoffnum);
|
||||
gistfillbuffer(page, itup, ntup, InvalidOffsetNumber);
|
||||
|
@ -208,23 +208,20 @@ gistbulkdelete(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
idxtuple = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(page, iid);
|
||||
|
||||
if (callback(&(idxtuple->t_tid), callback_state))
|
||||
{
|
||||
todelete[ntodelete] = i - ntodelete;
|
||||
ntodelete++;
|
||||
stats->tuples_removed += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
todelete[ntodelete++] = i;
|
||||
else
|
||||
stats->num_index_tuples += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
stats->tuples_removed += ntodelete;
|
||||
|
||||
if (ntodelete)
|
||||
{
|
||||
START_CRIT_SECTION();
|
||||
|
||||
MarkBufferDirty(buffer);
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < ntodelete; i++)
|
||||
PageIndexTupleDelete(page, todelete[i]);
|
||||
PageIndexMultiDelete(page, todelete, ntodelete);
|
||||
GistMarkTuplesDeleted(page);
|
||||
|
||||
if (RelationNeedsWAL(rel))
|
||||
|
@ -83,13 +83,11 @@ gistRedoPageUpdateRecord(XLogReaderState *record)
|
||||
/* Delete old tuples */
|
||||
if (xldata->ntodelete > 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
OffsetNumber *todelete = (OffsetNumber *) data;
|
||||
|
||||
data += sizeof(OffsetNumber) * xldata->ntodelete;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < xldata->ntodelete; i++)
|
||||
PageIndexTupleDelete(page, todelete[i]);
|
||||
PageIndexMultiDelete(page, todelete, xldata->ntodelete);
|
||||
if (GistPageIsLeaf(page))
|
||||
GistMarkTuplesDeleted(page);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Each page of XLOG file has a header like this:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC 0xD085 /* can be used as WAL version indicator */
|
||||
#define XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC 0xD086 /* can be used as WAL version indicator */
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct XLogPageHeaderData
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user