From 1f74a9088881d5e7e3fc20508bc6fa47beeb6290 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Riggs Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:34:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Correct phrasing in dsm.c comments --- src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c b/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c index 573c54d86d..cd13a6284c 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/ipc/dsm.c @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ dsm_cleanup_using_control_segment(dsm_handle old_control_handle) } /* - * OK, the control segment looks basically valid, so we can get use it to + * OK, the control segment looks basically valid, so we can use it to * get a list of segments that need to be removed. */ nitems = old_control->nitems; @@ -903,7 +903,7 @@ dsm_segment_map_length(dsm_segment *seg) * memory mapping. That process should then call dsm_segment_handle() to * obtain a handle for the mapping, and pass that handle to the * coordinating backend via some means (e.g. bgw_main_arg, or via the - * main shared memory segment). The recipient, once in position of the + * main shared memory segment). The recipient, once in possession of the * handle, should call dsm_attach(). */ dsm_handle