Fix portability bug in gin_page_opaque_info().

Somebody apparently thought that "if Int32GetDatum is good,
Int64GetDatum must be better".  Per buildfarm failures now
that Peter has added some regression tests here.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2016-11-02 00:09:27 -04:00
parent f7c9a6e083
commit 14ee35799f
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ gin_page_opaque_info(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
GinPageOpaque opaq;
HeapTuple resultTuple;
Datum values[3];
bool nulls[10];
bool nulls[3];
Datum flags[16];
int nflags = 0;
uint16 flagbits;
@ -152,9 +152,9 @@ gin_page_opaque_info(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
memset(nulls, 0, sizeof(nulls));
values[0] = Int64GetDatum(opaq->rightlink);
values[1] = Int64GetDatum(opaq->maxoff);
values[2] = PointerGetDatum(
construct_array(flags, nflags, TEXTOID, -1, false, 'i'));
values[1] = Int32GetDatum(opaq->maxoff);
values[2] = PointerGetDatum(construct_array(flags, nflags,
TEXTOID, -1, false, 'i'));
/* Build and return the result tuple. */
resultTuple = heap_form_tuple(tupdesc, values, nulls);