mirrors
/
postgres
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add WSACancelBlockingCall TODO.detail item.

This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian 2006-03-06 15:19:19 +00:00
parent e166574a1d
commit 07408e841d
1 changed files with 535 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

535
doc/TODO.detail/win32intr Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,535 @@
From pgsql-bugs-owner+M14436@postgresql.org Tue Feb 21 22:21:37 2006
Return-path: <pgsql-bugs-owner+M14436@postgresql.org>
Received: from ams.hub.org (ams.hub.org [200.46.204.13])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k1M3La514372
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:21:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by ams.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F65267B6A8
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:21:32 -0400 (AST)
X-Original-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FB99DCBE3
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:21:08 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 11699-01
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:21:12 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271CB9DCABD
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 21 Feb 2006 23:21:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
id 90AFD30BB2; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 04:21:09 +0100 (MET)
From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.bugs
Subject: [BUGS] FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:17:51 +0800
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <dtglar$15tv$1@news.hub.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.16 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.160]
X-Spam-Score: 0.16
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ORr
I encountered an error when I fast shutdown 8.1.1 on Win2k:
FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed: A blocking operation
was interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall.
A similar error on 8.1/win2003 was reported on pgsql-general (sorry, I can't
dig out the
original post from our web archives):
From: Niederland
Date: Tues, Dec 13 2005 9:49 am
2005-12-12 20:30:00 FATAL: semctl(50884184, 15, SETVAL, 0) failed: A
non-blocking socket operation could not be completed immediately.
---
There are two problems here:
(1) Why a socket error?
In port/win32.h, we have
#undef EAGAIN
#undef EINTR
#define EINTR WSAEINTR
#define EAGAIN WSAEWOULDBLOCK
What's the rationale of doing so?
(2) What's happened here?
It may come from PGSemaphoreReset(), and win32 semop() looks like this:
ret = WaitForMultipleObjectsEx(2, wh, FALSE, (sops[0].sem_flg &
IPC_NOWAIT) ? 0 : INFINITE, TRUE);
...
else if (ret == WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1 || ret == WAIT_IO_COMPLETION)
{
pgwin32_dispatch_queued_signals();
errno = EINTR;
}
else if (ret == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
errno = EAGAIN;
So it seems the EINTR is caused by an incoming signal, the EAGAIN is caused
by a TIMEOUT ... any ideas?
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
From pgsql-bugs-owner+M14482@postgresql.org Tue Feb 28 14:05:23 2006
Return-path: <pgsql-bugs-owner+M14482@postgresql.org>
Received: from ams.hub.org (ams.hub.org [200.46.204.13])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k1SJ5Mk19122
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:05:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by ams.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FB567B7BF
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:05:20 -0400 (AST)
X-Original-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1559DCB49
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:05:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 86421-08
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:05:04 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [70.90.9.53])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D669DCAA8
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:05:01 -0400 (AST)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k1SJ52b19021;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:05:02 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200602281905.k1SJ52b19021@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed
In-Reply-To: <dtglar$15tv$1@news.hub.org>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:05:02 -0500 (EST)
cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.100, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5]
X-Spam-Score: 0.4
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org
Status: OR
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
> I encountered an error when I fast shutdown 8.1.1 on Win2k:
>
> FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed: A blocking operation
> was interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall.
>
> A similar error on 8.1/win2003 was reported on pgsql-general (sorry, I can't
> dig out the
> original post from our web archives):
>
> From: Niederland
> Date: Tues, Dec 13 2005 9:49 am
>
> 2005-12-12 20:30:00 FATAL: semctl(50884184, 15, SETVAL, 0) failed: A
> non-blocking socket operation could not be completed immediately.
>
> ---
>
> There are two problems here:
>
> (1) Why a socket error?
> In port/win32.h, we have
>
> #undef EAGAIN
> #undef EINTR
> #define EINTR WSAEINTR
> #define EAGAIN WSAEWOULDBLOCK
>
> What's the rationale of doing so?
We did this so that our code could refer to EINTR/EAGAIN without
port-specific tests.
> (2) What's happened here?
> It may come from PGSemaphoreReset(), and win32 semop() looks like this:
>
> ret = WaitForMultipleObjectsEx(2, wh, FALSE, (sops[0].sem_flg &
> IPC_NOWAIT) ? 0 : INFINITE, TRUE);
> ...
> else if (ret == WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1 || ret == WAIT_IO_COMPLETION)
> {
> pgwin32_dispatch_queued_signals();
> errno = EINTR;
> }
> else if (ret == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
> errno = EAGAIN;
>
> So it seems the EINTR is caused by an incoming signal, the EAGAIN is caused
> by a TIMEOUT ... any ideas?
I looked at the documentation for the function:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/waitformultipleobjectsex.asp
and it isn't clear what return failure values it has. We certainly
could loop on WSAEINTR. Can you test it?
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
From pgsql-bugs-owner+M14483@postgresql.org Tue Feb 28 21:12:39 2006
Return-path: <pgsql-bugs-owner+M14483@postgresql.org>
Received: from ams.hub.org (ams.hub.org [200.46.204.13])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k212Cdk24423
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:12:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by ams.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9CF67B7CA
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:36 -0400 (AST)
X-Original-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B0B9DC837
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:17 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 65124-06
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:21 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5729DC81D
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:12:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
id 6A8CA30BA5; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 03:12:19 +0100 (MET)
From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.bugs
Subject: Re: [BUGS] FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:08:58 +0800
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <du2vtq$eu3$1@news.hub.org>
References: <dtglar$15tv$1@news.hub.org> <200602281905.k1SJ52b19021@candle.pha.pa.us>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
To: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.169 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.169]
X-Spam-Score: 0.169
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ORr
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
> > In port/win32.h, we have
> >
> > #undef EAGAIN
> > #undef EINTR
> > #define EINTR WSAEINTR
> > #define EAGAIN WSAEWOULDBLOCK
> >
> > What's the rationale of doing so?
>
> We did this so that our code could refer to EINTR/EAGAIN without
> port-specific tests.
>
AFAICS, by doing so, the EINTR/EAGAIN will be translated into
WSAINTR/WSAEWOULDBLOCK through *all* the backend code. That's seems not
appropriate for the code not involving any socket stuff ... I think we need
a fix here.
> > (2) What's happened here?
> > It may come from PGSemaphoreReset(), and win32 semop() looks like this:
> >
> > ret = WaitForMultipleObjectsEx(2, wh, FALSE, (sops[0].sem_flg &
> > IPC_NOWAIT) ? 0 : INFINITE, TRUE);
> > ...
> > else if (ret == WAIT_OBJECT_0 + 1 || ret == WAIT_IO_COMPLETION)
> > {
> > pgwin32_dispatch_queued_signals();
> > errno = EINTR;
> > }
> > else if (ret == WAIT_TIMEOUT)
> > errno = EAGAIN;
> >
> > So it seems the EINTR is caused by an incoming signal, the EAGAIN is
caused
> > by a TIMEOUT ... any ideas?
>
> I looked at the documentation for the function:
>
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/waitformultipleobjectsex.asp
>
> and it isn't clear what return failure values it has. We certainly
> could loop on WSAEINTR. Can you test it?
>
Yeah, looking at other code of using semop(), we could plug in a loop in the
win32 semctl():
/* Quickly lock/unlock the semaphore (if we can) */
+ do
+ {
+ errStatus = semop(semId, &sops, 1);
+ } while (errStatus < 0 && errno == EINTR);
if (semop(semId, &sops, 1) < 0)
return -1;
But:
(1) The EINTR problem happens rather rare, so testing it is difficult;
(2) I would rather not doing the above changes before we understand what's
happened here, especially when we have seen a EAGAIN reported here.
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-bugs-owner+M14485@postgresql.org Tue Feb 28 22:08:57 2006
Return-path: <pgsql-bugs-owner+M14485@postgresql.org>
Received: from ams.hub.org (ams.hub.org [200.46.204.13])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2138uk09057
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:08:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by ams.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EFF67B7CA
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:08:53 -0400 (AST)
X-Original-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2B39DCB5D
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:08:34 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 77300-07
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:08:38 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (candle.pha.pa.us [70.90.9.53])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B109DCB0D
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:08:31 -0400 (AST)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id k2138bO09022;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:08:37 -0500 (EST)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200603010308.k2138bO09022@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed
In-Reply-To: <du2vtq$eu3$1@news.hub.org>
To: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:08:37 -0500 (EST)
cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.404 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.096, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5]
X-Spam-Score: 0.404
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org
Status: OR
Qingqing Zhou wrote:
>
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
> > > In port/win32.h, we have
> > >
> > > #undef EAGAIN
> > > #undef EINTR
> > > #define EINTR WSAEINTR
> > > #define EAGAIN WSAEWOULDBLOCK
> > >
> > > What's the rationale of doing so?
> >
> > We did this so that our code could refer to EINTR/EAGAIN without
> > port-specific tests.
> >
>
> AFAICS, by doing so, the EINTR/EAGAIN will be translated into
> WSAINTR/WSAEWOULDBLOCK through *all* the backend code. That's seems not
> appropriate for the code not involving any socket stuff ... I think we need
> a fix here.
Uh, how do we handle it now? I thought we did just that.
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/waitformultipleobjectsex.asp
> >
> > and it isn't clear what return failure values it has. We certainly
> > could loop on WSAEINTR. Can you test it?
> >
>
> Yeah, looking at other code of using semop(), we could plug in a loop in the
> win32 semctl():
>
> /* Quickly lock/unlock the semaphore (if we can) */
> + do
> + {
> + errStatus = semop(semId, &sops, 1);
> + } while (errStatus < 0 && errno == EINTR);
>
> if (semop(semId, &sops, 1) < 0)
> return -1;
>
> But:
> (1) The EINTR problem happens rather rare, so testing it is difficult;
> (2) I would rather not doing the above changes before we understand what's
> happened here, especially when we have seen a EAGAIN reported here.
OK, so how do we find the answer?
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
SRA OSS, Inc. http://www.sraoss.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-bugs-owner+M14486@postgresql.org Tue Feb 28 22:21:21 2006
Return-path: <pgsql-bugs-owner+M14486@postgresql.org>
Received: from ams.hub.org (ams.hub.org [200.46.204.13])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k213LKk11157
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:21:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [200.46.204.71])
by ams.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9747667B7CC
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:21:17 -0400 (AST)
X-Original-To: pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC2C9DC9A1
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:20:52 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 79679-03
for <pgsql-bugs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:20:56 -0400 (AST)
Received: from svr4.postgresql.org (svr4.postgresql.org [66.98.251.159])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1939DC846
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:20:49 -0400 (AST)
Received: from cliff.cs.toronto.edu (cliff.cs.toronto.edu [128.100.3.120])
by svr4.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656B95AF07C
for <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 03:20:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from eon.cs (eon.cs.toronto.edu [128.100.3.15])
by cliff.cs.toronto.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4EB5FD0C;
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:20:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: by eon.cs (Postfix, from userid 1300)
id 127BA7BE; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:20:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eon.cs (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0653653C; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:20:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:20:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
X-X-Sender: zhouqq@eon.cs
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] FATAL: semctl(1672698088, 12, SETVAL, 0) failed
In-Reply-To: <200603010308.k2138bO09022@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602282216010.22190@eon.cs>
References: <200603010308.k2138bO09022@candle.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.442 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.037,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479]
X-Spam-Score: 0.442
X-Mailing-List: pgsql-bugs
List-Archive: <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs>
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=help>
List-Id: <pgsql-bugs.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=sub%20pgsql-bugs>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-bugs>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org
Status: OR
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Uh, how do we handle it now? I thought we did just that.
>
> OK, so how do we find the answer?
>
For both problems, I am uncertain (or I've sent a patch already :-(). Call
more artillery support here ...
Regards,
Qingqing
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings