postgres/contrib/fulltextindex/BENCH

98 lines
4.3 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

The following data was generated by the 'timings.sh' script included
in this directory. It uses a very large table with music-related
articles as a source for the fti-table. The tables used are:
product : contains product information : 540.429 rows
artist_fti : fti table for product : 4.501.321 rows
clustered : same as above, only clustered : 4.501.321 rows
A sequential scan of the artist_fti table (and thus also the clustered table)
takes around 6:16 minutes....
Unfortunately I cannot probide anybody else with this test-date, since I
am not allowed to redistribute the data (it's a database being sold by
a couple of wholesale companies). Anyways, it's megabytes, so you probably
wouldn't want it in this distribution anyways.
I haven't tested this with less data.
The test-machine is a Pentium 133, 64 MB, Linux 2.0.32 with the database
on a 'QUANTUM BIGFOOT_CY4320A, 4134MB w/67kB Cache, CHS=8960/15/63'. This
is a very slow disk.
The postmaster was running with:
postmaster -i -b /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres -S 1024 -B 256 \
-o -o /usr/local/pgsql/debug-output -F -d 1
('trashing' means a 'select count(*) from artist_fti' to completely trash
any disk-caches and buffers....)
TESTING ON UNCLUSTERED FTI
trashing
1: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.050u 0.000s 5m37.484s 0.01%
2: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.050u 0.030s 5m32.447s 0.02%
3: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.030u 0.020s 5m28.822s 0.01%
trashing
1: ^lling and ^tones : 0.020u 0.030s 0m54.313s 0.09%
2: ^lling and ^tones : 0.040u 0.030s 0m5.057s 1.38%
3: ^lling and ^tones : 0.010u 0.050s 0m2.072s 2.89%
trashing
1: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.020u 0.030s 0m26.241s 0.19%
2: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.050u 0.010s 0m1.316s 4.55%
3: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.030u 0.020s 0m1.029s 4.85%
trashing
1: ^lling : 0.040u 0.010s 0m55.104s 0.09%
2: ^lling : 0.030u 0.030s 0m4.716s 1.27%
3: ^lling : 0.040u 0.010s 0m2.157s 2.31%
trashing
1: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.040u 0.000s 1m5.630s 0.06%
2: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.050u 0.020s 1m3.561s 0.11%
3: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.050u 0.010s 1m5.923s 0.09%
trashing
1: ^lling (no join) : 0.050u 0.020s 0m24.139s 0.28%
2: ^lling (no join) : 0.040u 0.040s 0m1.087s 7.35%
3: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.772s 6.48%
trashing
1: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.030s 0m9.075s 0.77%
2: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.030u 0.010s 0m0.609s 6.56%
3: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.010s 0m0.503s 9.94%
trashing
1: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m49.898s 0.10%
2: ^rol (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m3.136s 1.59%
3: ^rol (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m1.231s 4.06%
TESTING ON CLUSTERED FTI
trashing
1: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.020u 0.020s 2m17.120s 0.02%
2: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.030u 0.020s 2m11.767s 0.03%
3: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.040u 0.010s 2m8.128s 0.03%
trashing
1: ^lling and ^tones : 0.020u 0.030s 0m18.179s 0.27%
2: ^lling and ^tones : 0.030u 0.010s 0m1.897s 2.10%
3: ^lling and ^tones : 0.040u 0.010s 0m1.619s 3.08%
trashing
1: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.070u 0.010s 0m11.765s 0.67%
2: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.040u 0.010s 0m1.198s 4.17%
3: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.030u 0.020s 0m0.872s 5.73%
trashing
1: ^lling : 0.040u 0.000s 0m28.623s 0.13%
2: ^lling : 0.030u 0.010s 0m2.339s 1.70%
3: ^lling : 0.030u 0.010s 0m1.975s 2.02%
trashing
1: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.020u 0.010s 0m17.667s 0.16%
2: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.030u 0.010s 0m3.745s 1.06%
3: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.030u 0.020s 0m3.439s 1.45%
trashing
1: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.040s 0m2.218s 2.70%
2: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.020s 0m0.506s 7.90%
3: ^lling (no join) : 0.030u 0.030s 0m0.510s 11.76%
trashing
1: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.050s 0m2.048s 4.39%
2: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m0.332s 15.04%
3: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.010s 0m0.318s 15.72%
trashing
1: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m2.384s 2.09%
2: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.676s 7.39%
3: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.697s 7.17%