musl/include/sys/statfs.h

#ifndef	_SYS_STATFS_H
#define	_SYS_STATFS_H

#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif

#include <sys/statvfs.h>

typedef struct {
	int __val[2];
} fsid_t;

#include <bits/statfs.h>

int statfs (const char *, struct statfs *);
int fstatfs (int, struct statfs *);

#ifdef __cplusplus
}
#endif

#endif
initial check-in, version 0.5.0 2011-02-12 08:22:29 +03:00			`#ifndef _SYS_STATFS_H`
			`#define _SYS_STATFS_H`

fix all missing instances of __cplusplus checks/extern "C" in headers patch by Arvid Picciani (aep) 2011-11-11 05:40:06 +04:00			`#ifdef __cplusplus`
			`extern "C" {`
			`#endif`

initial check-in, version 0.5.0 2011-02-12 08:22:29 +03:00			`#include <sys/statvfs.h>`

fix the definition of struct statvfs to match lsb abi at the same time, make struct statfs match the traditional definition and make it more useful, especially the fsid_t stuff. 2011-09-20 07:35:48 +04:00			`typedef struct {`
fix the fsid_t structure to match name of __val this is a case of poorly written man pages not matching the actual implementation, and why i hate implementing nonstandard interfaces with no actual documentation of how they're intended to work. 2011-09-20 19:16:27 +04:00			`int __val[2];`
fix the definition of struct statvfs to match lsb abi at the same time, make struct statfs match the traditional definition and make it more useful, especially the fsid_t stuff. 2011-09-20 07:35:48 +04:00			`} fsid_t;`

			`#include <bits/statfs.h>`

			`int statfs (const char , struct statfs );`
			`int fstatfs (int, struct statfs *);`
initial check-in, version 0.5.0 2011-02-12 08:22:29 +03:00
fix all missing instances of __cplusplus checks/extern "C" in headers patch by Arvid Picciani (aep) 2011-11-11 05:40:06 +04:00			`#ifdef __cplusplus`
			`}`
			`#endif`

initial check-in, version 0.5.0 2011-02-12 08:22:29 +03:00			`#endif`