mirrors/mimalloc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

update benchmark references

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Daan Leijen 2021-01-31 10:23:57 -08:00
parent 58678ac4eb
commit 558c8d085e
2 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/mimalloc-doc.h
View File

@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ synthetic benchmarks that see how the allocator behaves under more
extreme circumstances.
In our benchmarks, _mimalloc_ always outperforms all other leading
allocators (_jemalloc_, _tcmalloc_, _Hoard_, etc) (Apr 2019),
allocators (_jemalloc_, _tcmalloc_, _Hoard_, etc) (Jan 2021),
and usually uses less memory (up to 25% more in the worst case).
A nice property is that it does *consistently* well over the wide
range of benchmarks.

12
readme.md
View File

@ -458,8 +458,8 @@ the memory compacting [_Mesh_](https://github.com/plasma-umass/Mesh) (git:51222e
Bobby Powers _et al_ \[8],
and finally the default system allocator (glibc, 2.27) (based on _PtMalloc2_).
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-b.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-b.svg"/>
Any benchmarks ending in `N` run on all processors in parallel.
Results are averaged over 10 runs and reported relative
@ -550,8 +550,8 @@ having a 48 processor AMD Epyc 7000 at 2.5GHz with 384GiB of memory.
The results are similar to the Intel results but it is interesting to
see the differences in the _larsonN_, _mstressN_, and _xmalloc-testN_ benchmarks.
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-r5a-12xlarge-2020-01-16-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-r5a-12xlarge-2020-01-16-b.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-r5a-12xlarge-2020-01-16-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-r5a-12xlarge-2020-01-16-b.svg"/>
## Peak Working Set
@ -559,8 +559,8 @@ see the differences in the _larsonN_, _mstressN_, and _xmalloc-testN_ benchmarks
The following figure shows the peak working set (rss) of the allocators
on the benchmarks (on the c5.18xlarge instance).
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-rss-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-rss-b.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-rss-a.svg"/>
<img width="90%" src="doc/bench-2020/bench-c5-18xlarge-2020-01-20-rss-b.svg"/>
Note that the _xmalloc-testN_ memory usage should be disregarded as it
allocates more the faster the program runs. Similarly, memory usage of