The previous stackless implementations marked all 'luaV_execute'
invocations as fresh. However, re-entering 'luaV_execute' when
resuming a coroutine should not be a fresh invocation. (It works
because 'unroll' called 'luaV_execute' for each call entry, but
it was slower than letting 'luaV_execute' finish all non-fresh
invocations.)
A "with stack" implementation gains too little in performance to be
worth all the noise from C-stack overflows.
This commit is almost a sketch, to test performance. There are several
pending stuff:
- review control of C-stack overflow and error messages;
- what to do with setcstacklimit;
- review comments;
- review unroll of Lua calls.
In luaD_callnoyield, when there is a possible stack overflow, it
zeros the number of CallInfos to force a check when calling the
function. However, if the "function" is not a function, the code will
raise an error before checking the stack. Then, the error handling calls
luaD_callnoyield again and nCcalls is decremented again, crossing the
stack redzone without raising an error. (This loop can only happens
once, because the error handler must be a function. But once is enough
to cross the redzone.)
The field 'L->oldpc' is not always updated when control returns to a
function; an invalid value can seg. fault when computing 'changedline'.
(One example is an error in a finalizer; control can return to
'luaV_execute' without executing 'luaD_poscall'.) Instead of trying to
fix all possible corner cases, it seems safer to be resilient to invalid
values for 'oldpc'. Valid but wrong values at most cause an extra call
to a line hook.
When entering a coroutine, the computation of nCcalls added 'from->nci'
to correct for preallocated CallInfos, but 'nci' includes also the
Callinfos already used.
Macro 'checkstackGC' was doing a GC step after resizing the stack;
the GC could shrink the stack and undo the resize. Moreover, macro
'checkstackp' also does a GC step, which could remove the preallocated
CallInfo when calling a function. (Its name has been changed to
'checkstackGCp' to emphasize that it calls the GC.)
Back to how it was, a coroutine does not unwind its stack in case of
errors (and therefore do not close its to-be-closed variables). This
allows the stack to be examined after the error. The program can
use 'coroutine.kill' to close the variables.
The function created by 'coroutine.wrap', however, closes the
coroutine's variables in case of errors, as it is impossible to examine
the stack any way.
The limit LUAI_MAXCCALLS was renamed LUAI_MAXCSTACK, which better
represents its meaning. Moreover, its definition was moved to
'luaconf.h', given its importance now that Lua does not use
a "stackless" implementation.
To-be-closed variables must contain objects with '__toclose'
metamethods (or nil). Functions were removed for several reasons:
* Functions interact badly with sandboxes. If a sandbox raises
an error to interrupt a script, a to-be-closed function still
can hijack control and continue running arbitrary sandboxed code.
* Functions interact badly with coroutines. If a coroutine yields
and is never resumed again, its to-be-closed functions will never
run. To-be-closed objects, on the other hand, will still be closed,
provided they have appropriate finalizers.
* If you really need a function, it is easy to create a dummy
object to run that function in its '__toclose' metamethod.
This comit also adds closing of variables in case of panic.
* unification of the 'nny' and 'nCcalls' counters;
* external C functions ('lua_CFunction') count more "slots" in
the C stack (to allow for their possible use of buffers)
* added a new test script specific for C-stack overflows. (Most
of those tests were already present, but concentrating them
in a single script easies the task of checking whether
'LUAI_MAXCCALLS' is adequate in a system.)
New functions to reset/kill a thread/coroutine, mainly (only?) to
close any pending to-be-closed variable. ('lua_resetthread' also
allows a thread to be reused...)
- in 'luaB_tonumber', do not need to "checkany" when argument
is a number.
- in 'lua_resume', the call to 'luaD_rawrunprotected' cannot return
a status equal to -1.
(Long time without testing with '-DHARDSTACKTESTS'...)
With the introduction of to-be-closed variables, calls to 'luaF_close'
can move the stack, but some call sites where keeping pointers to the
stack without correcting them.
Start of the implementation of "scoped variables" or "to be closed"
variables, local variables whose '__close' (or themselves) are called
when they go out of scope. This commit implements the syntax, the
opcode, and the creation of the corresponding upvalue, but it still
does not call the finalizations when the variable goes out of scope
(the most important part).
Currently, the syntax is 'local scoped name = exp', but that will
probably change.
Resuming a coroutine uses more C stack than other operations (such as
function calls or recursive syntax). So, to avoid stack overflow
in recursive coroutine invocations, either LUAI_MAXCCALLS must be
too small or a coroutine invocation must "pay" a higher price.
New constant LUAL_COROCSTK ("COROutine C STaK") defines how much
is this price.
The counter 'nCcalls' now includes the number of CallInfo structures
pre-allocated (so that these "potential" C calls can be made without
checking 'nCcalls'). So, when copying this value from a thread to
another, in 'lua_resume', it must be corrected to the number of
CallInfo structures in the thread being resumed.
