macro 'luaL_getmetatable' seems more appropriate when getting

metatables in registry
This commit is contained in:
Roberto Ierusalimschy 2011-12-02 11:25:57 -02:00
parent 5999e14ad9
commit e2feb886d6

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
** $Id: lauxlib.c,v 1.237 2011/11/29 15:55:08 roberto Exp roberto $
** $Id: lauxlib.c,v 1.238 2011/11/30 12:58:57 roberto Exp roberto $
** Auxiliary functions for building Lua libraries
** See Copyright Notice in lua.h
*/
@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ LUALIB_API int luaL_execresult (lua_State *L, int stat) {
*/
LUALIB_API int luaL_newmetatable (lua_State *L, const char *tname) {
lua_getfield(L, LUA_REGISTRYINDEX, tname); /* get registry.name */
luaL_getmetatable(L, tname); /* try to get metatable */
if (!lua_isnil(L, -1)) /* name already in use? */
return 0; /* leave previous value on top, but return 0 */
lua_pop(L, 1);
@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ LUALIB_API void *luaL_testudata (lua_State *L, int ud, const char *tname) {
void *p = lua_touserdata(L, ud);
if (p != NULL) { /* value is a userdata? */
if (lua_getmetatable(L, ud)) { /* does it have a metatable? */
lua_getfield(L, LUA_REGISTRYINDEX, tname); /* get correct metatable */
luaL_getmetatable(L, tname); /* get correct metatable */
if (!lua_rawequal(L, -1, -2)) /* not the same? */
p = NULL; /* value is a userdata with wrong metatable */
lua_pop(L, 2); /* remove both metatables */