
• The output currently contains a large number of false-positives and — AFAICT — no actual issues. • Upstream shows little interest in addressing the long-standing issues with the TAILQ macros, so the false-positive situation probably won’t change soon: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18222 Currently, we largely spend travis CPU cycles on this, for no additional value.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
Description
No description provided
Languages
C
58.4%
Perl
36%
Raku
2.6%
Ruby
1.2%
Shell
0.7%
Other
1.1%