GUI

This is a bloat free stateless immediate mode graphical user interface toolkit written in ANSI C. It was designed as a embeddable user interface for graphical application and does not have any direct dependencies. The main premise of this toolkit is to be as stateless and simple but at the same time as powerful as possible with fast streamlined development speed in mind.

Features

• Immediate mode graphical user interface toolkit
• Written in C89 (ANSI C)
• Small codebase (~3kLOC)
• Focus on portability and minimal internal state
• Suited for embedding into graphical applications
• No global hidden state
• No direct dependencies (not even libc!)
• Full memory management control
• Renderer and platform independent
• Configurable style and colors
• UTF-8 support

Limitations

• Does NOT provide os window/input management
• Does NOT provide a renderer backend
• Does NOT implement a font library
  Summary: It is only responsible for the actual user interface

Target applications

• Graphical tools/editors
• Library testbed UI
• Game engine debugging UI
• Graphical overlays

Gallery

Example

/* allocate memory to hold output */
struct gui_memory memory = {...};
struct gui_command_buffer buffer;
gui_buffer_init_fixed(buffer, &memory, 0);

/* initialize panel */
struct gui_config config;
struct gui_input input = {0};
struct gui_font font = {...};
struct gui_panel panel;
gui_default_config(&config);
gui_panel_init(&panel, 50, 50, 220, 170,
    GUI_PANEL_BORDER|GUI_PANEL_MOVEABLE|
    GUI_PANEL_CLOSEABLE|GUI_PANEL_SCALEABLE|
    GUI_PANEL_MINIMIZABLE, &config, &font);

while (1) {
    gui_input_begin(&input);
    /* record input */
    gui_input_end(&input);

    /* transient frame data */
    struct gui_canvas canvas;
    struct gui_command_list list;
    struct gui_panel_layout layout;
    struct gui_memory_status status;

    gui_buffer_begin(&canvas, &buffer, window_width, window_height);
    gui_panel_begin(&layout, &panel, "Demo", &canvas, &input);
    gui_panel_row(&layout, 30, 1);
    if (gui_panel_button_text(&layout, "button", GUI_BUTTON_DEFAULT)) {
        /* event handling */
    }

    gui_panel_row(&layout, 30, 2);
    if (gui_panel_option(&layout, "easy", option == 0)) option = 0;
    if (gui_panel_option(&layout, "hard", option == 1)) option = 1;

    gui_panel_label(&layout, "input:", GUI_TEXT_LEFT);
    len = gui_panel_edit(&layout, buffer, len, 256, &active, GUI_INPUT_DEFAULT);
    gui_panel_end(&layout, &panel);
    gui_buffer_end(&list, &buffer, &canvas, &status);

    const struct gui_command *cmd = gui_list_begin(&list);
    while (cmd) {
        /* execute command */
        cmd = gui_list_next(&list, cmd);
    }
}

IMGUIs

Immediate mode in contrast to classical retained mode GUIs store as little state as possible by using procedural function calls as "widgets" instead of storing objects. Each "widget" function call takes hereby all its necessary data and immediately returns the through the user modified state back to the caller. Immediate mode graphical user interfaces therefore combine drawing and input handling into one unit instead of separating them like retain mode GUIs.

Since there is no to minimal internal state in immediate mode user interfaces, updates have to occur every frame which on one hand is more drawing expensive than classic retained GUI implementations but on the other hand grants a lot more flexibility and support for overall layout changes. In addition without any state there is no duplicated state between your program, the gui and the user which greatly simplifies code. Further traits of immediate mode graphic user interfaces are a code driven style, centralized flow control, easy extensibility and understandability.

Input

The gui_input struct holds the user input over the course of the frame and manages the complete modification of widget and panel state. To fill the structure with data over the frame there are a number of functions provided for key, motion, button and text input. The input is hereby completly independent of the underlying platform or way of input so even touch or other ways of input are possible. Like the panel and the buffer, input is based on an immediate mode API and consist of an begin sequence with gui_input_begin and a end sequence point with gui_input_end. All modifications can only occur between both of these sequence points while all outside modification provoke undefined behavior.

struct gui_input input = {0};
while (1) {
    gui_input_begin(&input);
    /* record input */
    gui_input_end(&input);
}

Font

Since there is no direct font implementation in the toolkit but font handling is still an aspect of a gui implementation, the gui_font struct was introduced. It only contains the bare minimum of what is needed for font handling. For widgets the gui_font data has to be persistent while the panel hold the font internally. Important to node is that the font does not hold your font data but merely references it so you have to make sure that the font always points to a valid object.

struct gui_font {
    void *userdata;
    gui_float height;
    gui_text_width_f width;
};

Configuration

The gui toolkit provides a number of different attributes that can be configured, like spacing, padding, size and color. While the widget API even expects you to provide the configuration for each and every widget the panel layer provides you with a set of attributes in the gui_config structure. The structure either needs to be filled by the user or can be setup with some default values by the function gui_default_config. Modification on the fly to the gui_config struct is in true immediate mode fashion possible and supported.

struct gui_config {
    struct gui_vec2 panel_padding;
    struct gui_vec2 panel_min_size;
    struct gui_vec2 item_spacing;
    struct gui_vec2 item_padding;
    struct gui_vec2 scaler_size;
    gui_float scrollbar_width;
    struct gui_color colors[GUI_COLOR_COUNT];
};

Canvas

The Canvas is the abstract drawing interface between the GUI toolkit and the user and contains drawing callbacks for the primitives scissor, line, rectangle, circle, triangle, bitmap and text which need to be provided by the user. Main advantage of using the raw canvas instead of using buffering is that no memory to buffer all draw command is needed. Instead you can directly draw each requested primitive. The downside is setting up the canvas structure and the fact that you have to draw each primitive immediately. Internally the canvas is used to implement the buffering of primitive draw commands, but can be used to implement a different buffering scheme like buffering vertexes instead of primitives.

struct gui_canvas {
    void *userdata;
    gui_size width;
    gui_size height;
    gui_scissor scissor;
    gui_draw_line draw_line;
    gui_draw_rect draw_rect;
    gui_draw_circle draw_circle;
    gui_draw_triangle draw_triangle;
    gui_draw_image draw_image;
    gui_draw_text draw_text;
};

Memory

Almost all memory as well as object management for the toolkit is left to the user for maximum control. In fact a big subset of the toolkit can be used without any heap allocation at all. The only place where heap allocation is needed at all is for buffering draw calls for overlapping panels or defered drawing. While the standart way of memory allocation in that case for libraries is to just provide allocator callbacks which is implemented aswell with the gui_allocator structure, there are two addition ways to provided memory. The first one is to just providing a static fixed size memory block to fill up which is handy for UIs with roughly known memory requirements. The other way of memory managment is to extend the fixed size block with the abiltiy to resize your block at the end of the frame if there is not enough memory. For the purpose of resizable fixed size memory blocks and for general information about memory consumption the gui_memory_status structure was added. It contains information about the allocated amount of data in the current frame as well as the needed amount if not enough memory was provided.

struct gui_memory {
    void *memory;
    gui_size size;
};

struct gui_memory_status {
    gui_size size;
    gui_size allocated;
    gui_size needed;
    gui_size clipped_commands;
    gui_size clipped_memory;
};

struct gui_allocator {
    void *userdata;
    void*(*alloc)(void *usr, gui_size);
    void*(*realloc)(void *usr, void*, gui_size);
    void(*free)(void *usr, void*);
};

Buffering

While a raw canvas provides the ability to draw without any problems, the pure nature of callbacks is a loss of flow control. You have to immediately draw a primitive to screen which forces your application to build around the toolkit instead of controling it. An additional disadvantage of callbacks in this particular case is that dynamically overlapping panels cannot be implemented since the drawing order is static. The buffer fixes these problem in exchange for some memory consumption while still using a canvas internally which adds primitves as commands into a queue which can later be drawn to screen. Since the buffer provides a canvas to draw to no additional API changes have to take place. In true immediate mode fashion the buffering API is based around sequence points with a begin sequence point gui_buffer_begin and a end sequence point gui_buffer_end and modification of state between both points. Buffer and canvas modification before the beginning or after the end sequence point is undefined behavior.

struct gui_memory_status status;
struct gui_command_list list;
struct gui_allocator allocator = {...};
struct gui_command_buffer buffer;
gui_buffer_init(buffer, &allocator, 2.0f, INITAL_SIZE, 0);

while (1) {
    struct gui_canvas canvas;
    gui_buffer_begin(&canvas, &buffer, window_width, window_height);
    /* add commands by using the canvas */
    gui_buffer_end(&list, buffer, &canvas, &status);
}

For the purpose of making multible panels easier to handle, sub buffers were implemented. With sub buffers you can create one global buffer which owns the allocated memory and sub buffers which directly reference the global buffer. The biggest advantage is that you do not have to allocate a buffer for each panel and boil down the memory management to a single buffer.

struct gui_memory memory = {...};
struct gui_memory_status status;
struct gui_command_list list;
struct gui_command_buffer buffer;
gui_buffer_init_fixed(buffer, &memory);

while (1) {
    struct gui_canvas canvas;
    struct gui_command_buffer sub;

    gui_buffer_begin(NULL, &buffer, width, height);
    gui_buffer_lock(&canvas, &buffer, &sub, 0, width, height);
    /* add commands by using the canvas */
    gui_buffer_unlock(&list, &buffer, &sub, &canvas, NULL);
    gui_buffer_end(NULL, &buffer, NULL, &status);
}

Widgets

The minimal widget API provides a number of basic widgets and is designed for uses cases where no complex widget layouts or grouping is needed. In order for the GUI to work each widget needs a canvas to draw to, positional and widgets specific data as well as user input and returns the from the user input modified state of the widget.

struct gui_input input = {0};
struct gui_font font = {...};
struct gui_canvas canvas = {...};
const struct gui_slider style = {...};
gui_float value = 5.0f
gui_size prog = 20;
gui_default_config(&config);

while (1) {
    value = gui_slider(&canvas, 50, 50, 100, 30, 0, value, 10, 1, &style, &input);
    prog = gui_progress(&canvas, 50, 100, 100, 30, prog, 100, gui_false, &style, &input);
}

Panels

To further extend the basic widget layer and remove some of the boilerplate code the panel was introduced. The panel groups together a number of widgets but in true immediate mode fashion does not save any state from widgets that have been added to the panel. In addition the panel enables a number of nice features on a group of widgets like movement, scaling, hidding and minimizing. An additional use for panel is to further extend the grouping of widgets into tabs, groups and shelfs. The panel is divided into a struct gui_panel with persistent life time and the struct gui_panel_layout structure with a temporary life time. While the layout state is constantly modified over the course of the frame, the panel struct is only modified at the immediate mode sequence points gui_panel_begin and gui_panel_end. Therefore all changes to the panel struct inside of both sequence points have no effect in the current frame and are only visible in the next frame.

struct gui_font font = {...};
struct gui_input input = {0};
struct gui_canvas canvas = {...};
struct gui_config config;
struct gui_panel panel;
gui_default_config(&config);
gui_panel_init(&panel, 50, 50, 300, 200, 0, &config, &font);

while (1) {
    struct gui_panel_layout layout;
    gui_panel_begin(&layout, &panel, "Demo", &canvas, &input);
    gui_panel_row(&layout, 30, 1);
    if (gui_panel_button_text(&layout, "button", GUI_BUTTON_DEFAULT))
        fprintf(stdout, "button pressed!\n");
    value = gui_panel_slider(&layout, 0, value, 10, 1);
    progress = gui_panel_progress(&layout, progress, 100, gui_true);
    gui_panel_end(&layout, &panel);
}

Stack

While using basic panels is fine for a single movable panel or a big number of static panels, it has rather limited support for overlapping movable panels. For that to change the panel stack was introduced. The panel stack holds the basic drawing order of each panel so instead of drawing each panel individually they have to be drawn in a certain order.

struct your_window {
    struct gui_panel_hook hook;
    /* your data */
}

struct gui_memory memory = {...};
struct gui_memory_status status;
struct gui_command_buffer buffer;
gui_buffer_init_fixed(buffer, &memory);

struct gui_config config;
struct gui_font font = {...}
struct gui_input input = {0};
struct your_window win;
gui_default_config(&config);
gui_panel_hook_init(&win.hook, 50, 50, 300, 200, 0, &config, &font);

struct gui_stack stack;
gui_stack_clear(&stack);
gui_stack_push(&stack, &win.hook);

while (1) {
    struct gui_panel_layout layout;
    struct gui_canvas canvas;

    gui_buffer_begin(&canvas, &buffer, window_width, window_height);
    gui_panel_hook_begin(&layout, &win.hook, &stack, "Demo", &canvas, &input);
    gui_panel_row(&layout, 30, 1);
    if (gui_panel_button_text(&layout, "button", GUI_BUTTON_DEFAULT))
        fprintf(stdout, "button pressed!\n");
    gui_panel_hook_end(&layout, &win.hook);
    gui_buffer_end(gui_hook_list(&win.hook), buffer, &status);

    /* draw each panel */
    struct gui_panel_hook *iter = stack.begin;
    while (iter) {
        const struct gui_command *cmd = gui_list_begin(gui_hook_list(h));
        while (cmd) {
            /* execute command */
            cmd = gui_list_next(gui_hook_output(iter), cmd);
        }
        iter = iter->next;
    }
}

FAQ

Where is the demo/example code?

The demo and example code can be found in the demo folder. There is demo code for Linux(X11), Windows(win32) and OpenGL(SDL2, freetype). As for now there will be no DirectX demo since I don't have experience programming with DirectX but you are more than welcome to provide one.

Why did you use ANSI C and not C99 or C++?

Personally I stay out of all "discussions" about C vs C++ since they are totally worthless and never brought anything good with it. The simple answer is I personally love C and have nothing against people using C++ especially the new iterations with C++11 and C++14. While this hopefully settles my view on C vs C++ there is still ANSI C vs C99. While for personal projects I only use C99 with all its niceties, libraries are a little bit different. Libraries are designed to reach the highest number of users possible which brings me to ANSI C as the most portable version. In addition not all C compiler like the MSVC compiler fully support C99, which finalized my decision to use ANSI C.

Why do you typedef your own types instead of using the standard types?

This Project uses ANSI C which does not have the header file <stdint.h> and therefore does not provide the fixed sized types that I need. Therefore I defined my own types which need to be set to the correct size for each platform. But if your development environment provides the header file you can define GUI_USE_FIXED_SIZE_TYPES to directly use the correct types.

Why is font/input/window management not provided?

As for window and input management it is a ton of work to abstract over all possible platforms and there are already libraries like SDL or SFML or even the platform itself which provide you with the functionality. So instead of reinventing the wheel and trying to do everything the project tries to be as independent and out of the users way as possible. This means in practice a little bit more work on the users behalf but grants a lot more freedom especially because the toolkit is designed to be embeddable.

The font management on the other hand is litte bit more tricky. In the beginning the toolkit had some basic font handling but I removed it later. This is mainly a question of if font handling should be part of a gui toolkit or not. As for a framework the question would definitely be yes but for a toolkit library the question is not as easy. In the end the project does not have font handling since there are already a number of font handling libraries in existence or even the platform (Xlib, Win32) itself already provides a solution.

References

• Tutorial from Jari Komppa about imgui libraries
• Johannes 'johno' Norneby's article
• Casey Muratori's original introduction to imgui's
• Casey Muratori's imgui panel design(1/2)
• Casey Muratori's imgui panel design(2/2)
• Casey Muratori: Designing and Evaluation Reusable Components
• ImGui: The inspiration for this project
• Nvidia's imgui toolkit

License

(The MIT License)