Small cleanup of passing around decorations flag.
Limit PercentScreen to single monitor vs. entire desktop. IMO - this is better behavior in a multimonitor environment.
Handle fullscreen windows better:
1. Ensure that size hints are set to allow resizing before setting a window to fullscreen as some window managers do not behave properly.
2. Handle fullscreen toggles without destroying and recreating window.
3. Use NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN Extended Window Manager Hint for fullscreen functionality
4. Use the NET_WM_FULLSCREEN_MONITORS Extended Window Manager Hint when appropriate
5. When a single monitor fullscreen is requested - use the current monitor(as determined from mouse location)
6. Handle cases where there is no local monitor at coordinate 0,0. The Windows server expect there to be a monitor at this location, so we maintain offset if necessary between our local primary monitor and the server side primary monitor located at 0,0.
Extend rdp_pointer with function SetPosition. Can then be used by
clients support setting pointer by server which might be used in
shadowing scenarios.
The Programmer Dvorak keyboard layout is supported by Xkb but support
in Windows is only available through an open-source add-on driver. It
is plausible that those that use this layout in X11 also installs this
driver on Windows instead of using the standard Dvorak variant there.
This changeset recognizes Programmer Dvorak as its own variant, and
assigns this a layout ID which matches the one used in the Windows
driver so that it will be selected when you logon. If this layout is
not available, it will now revert to the regular United States layout.
Tested with Ubuntu Precise 12.04 connecting to Windows 7 SP1.
The input->FocusInEvent callback implementations (normal and fast-path) have
always sent the mouse position even if the pointer was outside of the freerdp
client area. In addition xfreerdp used the wrong pointer coordinates which
were relative to the root window instead of its own.
On focus-in the pointer position must only be sent if the pointer is
currently within the program's client area. However, the clients had no way
to pass that information to input->FocusInEvent which required an API change.
- removed mouse pointer x, y parameters from input interface's FocusInEvent
- clients are responsible to call input->MouseEvent on focus-in if necessary
- fixed xfreerdp and wfreerdp accordingly
[MS-RDPBCGR] Section 5.3 describes the encryption level and method values for
standard RDP security.
Looking at the current usage of these values in the FreeRDP code gives me
reason to believe that there is a certain lack of understanding of how these
values should be handled.
The encryption level is only configured on the server side in the "Encryption
Level" setting found in the Remote Desktop Session Host Configuration RDP-Tcp
properties dialog and this value is never transferred from the client to the
server over the wire.
The possible options are "None", "Low", "Client Compatible", "High" and
"FIPS Compliant". The client receices this value in the Server Security Data
block (TS_UD_SC_SEC1), probably only for informational purposes and maybe to
give the client the possibility to verify if the server's decision for the
encryption method confirms to the server's encryption level.
The possible encryption methods are "NONE", "40BIT", "56BIT", "128BIT" and
"FIPS" and the RDP client advertises the ones it supports to the server in the
Client Security Data block (TS_UD_CS_SEC).
The server's configured encryption level value restricts the possible final
encryption method.
Something that I was not able to find in the documentation is the priority
level of the individual encryption methods based on which the server makes its
final method decision if there are several options.
My analysis with Windows Servers reveiled that the order is 128, 56, 40, FIPS.
The server only chooses FIPS if the level is "FIPS Comliant" or if it is the
only method advertised by the client.
Bottom line:
* FreeRDP's client side does not need to set settings->EncryptionLevel
(which was done quite frequently).
* FreeRDP's server side does not have to set the supported encryption methods
list in settings->EncryptionMethods
Changes in this commit:
Removed unnecessary/confusing changes of EncryptionLevel/Methods settings
Refactor settings->DisableEncryption
* This value actually means "Advanced RDP Encryption (NLA/TLS) is NOT used"
* The old name caused lots of confusion among developers
* Renamed it to "UseRdpSecurityLayer" (the compare logic stays untouched)
Any client's setting of settings->EncryptionMethods were annihilated
* All clients "want" to set all supported methods
* Some clients forgot 56bit because 56bit was not supported at the time the
code was written
* settings->EncryptionMethods was overwritten anyways in nego_connect()
* Removed all client side settings of settings->EncryptionMethods
The default is "None" (0)
* Changed nego_connect() to advertise all supported methods if
settings->EncryptionMethods is 0 (None)
* Added a commandline option /encryption-methods:comma separated list of the
values "40", "56", "128", "FIPS". E.g. /encryption-methods:56,128
* Print warning if server chooses non-advertised method
Verify received level and method in client's gcc_read_server_security_data
* Only accept valid/known encryption methods
* Verify encryption level/method combinations according to MS-RDPBCGR 5.3.2
Server implementations can now set settings->EncryptionLevel
* The default for settings->EncryptionLevel is 0 (None)
* nego_send_negotiation_response() changes it to ClientCompatible in that case
* default to ClientCompatible if the server implementation set an invalid level
Fix server's gcc_write_server_security_data
* Verify server encryption level value set by server implementations
* Choose rdp encryption method based on level and supported client methods
* Moved FIPS to the lowest priority (only used if other methods are possible)
Updated sample server
* Support RDP Security (RdpKeyFile was not set)
* Added commented sample code for setting the security level
The fOpRedundant field of the GlyphIndex primary drawing order
(MS-RDPEGDI, chapter 2.2.2.2.1.1.2.13) was neglected which resulted in some
severe text rendering errors.
