Bochs/sfsite
2003-01-09 05:54:59 +00:00
..
images Added new 2.0 graphic. 2002-11-29 20:34:25 +00:00
includes - add update current version to 2.0.1 2003-01-09 05:54:59 +00:00
networking
testing-forms
.htaccess
bochs-irc-meeting-05-30-2001.txt
bochs-pr-20010604.txt
bochspr-20011210.txt
default_page.php
diskimages.html - add warning that many disk images are out of date 2002-09-30 21:01:39 +00:00
favicon.ico
footer.txt
getcurrent.html - add reference to 2.0.1 2003-01-09 05:53:54 +00:00
getinvolved.html
header.html
index.html - update for 2.0 2002-12-22 16:07:07 +00:00
irc-200105.html
irc-20010530.html
irc-20010619.html
irc-20020407.html
irc-20021013.html - post irc chat log on web site 2002-10-14 12:37:49 +00:00
irc.html
ircsurvey.html
links.html
lxr_search_help.html
mailinglists.html
Makefile Repairing index.html 2002-11-29 20:54:14 +00:00
news.html - fix broken links on news.html 2002-09-24 22:46:28 +00:00
peter_bryce_20010614.html
README
related.html
release2_0.html - CHANGES is done now 2002-12-21 15:58:15 +00:00
screenshots.html
searchresults.html
techdata.html
topper-sf-test.html
update-sites.txt

Sun Jun 17 00:30:54 EDT 2001

I checked in most parts of the Bochs web site.  Some subdirs are omitted
for various reasons.  For example the "data" directory (collection of
tech specs) and guestos directory (disk images) are not checked into 
CVS because they are so large.  If the files are big, binary, and
are hardly ever revised, what's the point of version control on them?
It will just clog up SF server and make updates take longer!

Directories included in CVS:
- docs-html              (actually a checkout of bochs/docs-html)
- images
- includes
- networking
- testing-forms


Directories not included in CVS:
- xcf             (what's that)
- doc             (updated by Michael when he does make webinst)
- screenshot      (contains screen shots)
- tmp             (misc stuff)
- data            (tech spcs)
- images/.pics    (not sure)
- images/.xvpics  (not sure)