docs: Add PHILOSOPHY.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c1b96b393
commit
191ad51eaa
|
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||||
|
# Limine's Design Philosophy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Why not support filesystem X or feature Y? (eg: LUKS, LVM)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The idea with Limine is to remove the responsibility of parsing filesystems and formats, aside from the bare minimum necessities (eg: FAT*, ISO9660),
|
||||||
|
from the bootloader itself.
|
||||||
|
It is a needless duplication of efforts to have bootloaders support all possible filesystems and formats, and it leads to massive, bloated
|
||||||
|
bootloaders as a result (eg: GRUB2).
|
||||||
|
What is needed is to simply make sure the bootloader is capable of reading its own files, configuration, and be able to load kernel/module files
|
||||||
|
from disk. The kernel should be responsible for parsing everything else as it sees fit.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What about LUKS? What about security? Encrypt the kernel!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Simply put, this is unnecessary. Putting the kernel/modules in a readable FAT32 partition and letting Limine know about their BLAKE2B checksums
|
||||||
|
in the config file provides as much security as encrypting the kernel does.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What? But what if someone modifies the config file! Ha! You clearly have not thought about that!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We have. While this is a pointless effort on legacy x86 BIOS, it is a reasonable expectation on UEFI systems with Secure Boot. Limine provides a
|
||||||
|
way to modify its own EFI executable to bake in the BLAKE2B checksum of the config file itself. The EFI executable gets then enrolled or otherwise
|
||||||
|
verified by the Secure Boot loader through, eg., the shim project. This prevents modifications being done to the config file (and in turn the
|
||||||
|
checksums contained there) from going unnoticed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### What about ext2/3/4? Why is that supported then?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Simply put, legacy. And because a lot of Linux users expect it to "work that way". It is not unreasonable for ext2/3/4 support to be eventually
|
||||||
|
dropped.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### But I don't want to have a separate FAT boot partition! I don't want it!!!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Well tough luck. It is `$year_following_2012` now and most PCs are equipped with UEFI and simply won't boot without a FAT EFI system partition
|
||||||
|
anyways. It is not unreasonable to share the EFI system partition with the OS's /boot and store kernels and initramfses there.
|
15
README.md
15
README.md
|
@ -23,19 +23,18 @@ as the reference implementation for the [Limine boot protocol](/PROTOCOL.md).
|
||||||
* Multiboot 2
|
* Multiboot 2
|
||||||
* Chainloading
|
* Chainloading
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Supported partitioning schemes
|
||||||
|
* MBR
|
||||||
|
* GPT
|
||||||
|
* Unpartitioned media
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Supported filesystems
|
### Supported filesystems
|
||||||
* ext2/3/4
|
* ext2/3/4
|
||||||
* FAT12/16/32
|
* FAT12/16/32
|
||||||
* ISO9660 (CDs/DVDs)
|
* ISO9660 (CDs/DVDs)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Even though these are the filesystems Limine supports directly, *any*
|
If your filesystem isn't listed here, please read [the philosophy](/PHILOSOPHY.md) first, especially before
|
||||||
filesystem can be utilised by the kernel provided that the kernel (and any
|
opening issues or pull requests related to this.
|
||||||
needed modules) are on a directly supported filesystem.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Supported partitioning schemes
|
|
||||||
* MBR
|
|
||||||
* GPT
|
|
||||||
* Unpartitioned media
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Minimum system requirements
|
### Minimum system requirements
|
||||||
For 32-bit x86 systems, support is only ensured starting with those with
|
For 32-bit x86 systems, support is only ensured starting with those with
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue