I've already switched the page pointer to vm_cache, so this comment was
not necessary anymore. git-svn-id: file:///srv/svn/repos/haiku/trunk/current@9268 a95241bf-73f2-0310-859d-f6bbb57e9c96
This commit is contained in:
parent
adf3b19660
commit
b492de88e3
@ -1319,13 +1319,10 @@ vm_copy_on_write_area(vm_region *area)
|
||||
map->ops->lock(map);
|
||||
map->ops->unmap(map, area->base, area->base + area->size - 1);
|
||||
|
||||
// ToDo: it seems to make more sense to attach the pages to the vm_cache
|
||||
// instead of the vm_cache_ref object - this way, we would not need to
|
||||
// move the pages around (just remap them)
|
||||
|
||||
for (page = lowerCache->page_list; page; page = page->cache_next) {
|
||||
map->ops->map(map, area->base + page->offset, page->ppn * B_PAGE_SIZE, protection);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
map->ops->unlock(map);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&lowerCacheRef->lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user