Fix #8749.
- When a job needs to go dependent on another job, we no longer use recursion to manage the execution stack. Instead the job is simply marked as waiting and we execute other jobs with no dependencies in the meantime. When a job completes, all dependents are moved back onto the unscheduled list and executed as needed. - Adjustments to ResolveValueNodeJob to handle the now asynchronous nature of waiting.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0237895604
commit
1f80f2eec3
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright 2012, Rene Gollent, rene@gollent.com.
|
||||
* Copyright 2009, Ingo Weinhold, ingo_weinhold@gmx.de.
|
||||
* Distributed under the terms of the MIT License.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -523,6 +524,9 @@ ResolveValueNodeValueJob::_ResolveNodeValue()
|
||||
fValueNode, fValueNode->Name().String(), parentNode);
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (State() == JOB_STATE_WAITING)
|
||||
return B_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// resolve the node child location, if necessary
|
||||
@ -629,6 +633,8 @@ ResolveValueNodeValueJob::_ResolveParentNodeValue(ValueNode* parentNode)
|
||||
// "Not found" can happen due to a race condition between
|
||||
// unlocking the worker and starting to wait.
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case JOB_DEPENDENCY_ACTIVE:
|
||||
return B_OK;
|
||||
case JOB_DEPENDENCY_FAILED:
|
||||
case JOB_DEPENDENCY_ABORTED:
|
||||
default:
|
||||
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright 2012, Rene Gollent, rene@gollent.com.
|
||||
* Copyright 2009, Ingo Weinhold, ingo_weinhold@gmx.de.
|
||||
* Distributed under the terms of the MIT License.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -138,6 +139,15 @@ void
|
||||
Job::SetWaitStatus(job_wait_status status)
|
||||
{
|
||||
fWaitStatus = status;
|
||||
switch (fWaitStatus) {
|
||||
case JOB_DEPENDENCY_ACTIVE:
|
||||
fState = JOB_STATE_WAITING;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
fState = JOB_STATE_ACTIVE;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -346,18 +356,6 @@ Worker::WaitForJob(Job* waitingJob, const JobKey& key)
|
||||
waitingJob->SetDependency(job);
|
||||
job->DependentJobs().Add(waitingJob);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: Continuations would be nice. For the time being we have to use
|
||||
// recursion. Disadvantages are that we'll use more stack and that aborting
|
||||
// a job waiting for a dependency won't abort the job before the dependency
|
||||
// is done.
|
||||
locker.Unlock();
|
||||
_ProcessJobs(waitingJob);
|
||||
locker.Lock();
|
||||
|
||||
// ignore the actual wait status when the game is over anyway
|
||||
if (fTerminating || waitingJob->State() == JOB_STATE_ABORTED)
|
||||
return JOB_DEPENDENCY_ABORTED;
|
||||
|
||||
return waitingJob->WaitStatus();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -372,7 +370,7 @@ Worker::_WorkerLoopEntry(void* data)
|
||||
status_t
|
||||
Worker::_WorkerLoop()
|
||||
{
|
||||
_ProcessJobs(NULL);
|
||||
_ProcessJobs();
|
||||
|
||||
// clean up aborted jobs
|
||||
AutoLocker<Worker> locker(this);
|
||||
@ -384,7 +382,7 @@ Worker::_WorkerLoop()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
Worker::_ProcessJobs(Job* waitingJob)
|
||||
Worker::_ProcessJobs()
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (true) {
|
||||
AutoLocker<Worker> locker(this);
|
||||
@ -395,8 +393,10 @@ Worker::_ProcessJobs(Job* waitingJob)
|
||||
|
||||
status_t error = acquire_sem(fWorkToDoSem);
|
||||
if (error != B_OK) {
|
||||
if (error == B_INTERRUPTED)
|
||||
if (error == B_INTERRUPTED) {
|
||||
locker.Lock();
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -404,13 +404,9 @@ Worker::_ProcessJobs(Job* waitingJob)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// clean up aborted jobs
|
||||
while (Job* job = fAbortedJobs.RemoveHead()) {
|
||||
while (Job* job = fAbortedJobs.RemoveHead())
|
||||
_FinishJob(job);
|
||||
|
||||
if (waitingJob != NULL && waitingJob->State() != JOB_STATE_WAITING)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// process the next job
|
||||
if (Job* job = fUnscheduledJobs.RemoveHead()) {
|
||||
job->SetState(JOB_STATE_ACTIVE);
|
||||
@ -422,12 +418,10 @@ Worker::_ProcessJobs(Job* waitingJob)
|
||||
if (job->State() == JOB_STATE_ACTIVE) {
|
||||
job->SetState(
|
||||
error == B_OK ? JOB_STATE_SUCCEEDED : JOB_STATE_FAILED);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if (job->State() == JOB_STATE_WAITING)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
_FinishJob(job);
|
||||
|
||||
if (waitingJob != NULL && waitingJob->State() != JOB_STATE_WAITING)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -492,7 +486,10 @@ Worker::_FinishJob(Job* job)
|
||||
while (Job* dependentJob = job->DependentJobs().RemoveHead()) {
|
||||
dependentJob->SetDependency(NULL);
|
||||
dependentJob->SetWaitStatus(waitStatus);
|
||||
fUnscheduledJobs.Add(dependentJob);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
release_sem(fWorkToDoSem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (job->State() != JOB_STATE_ABORTED)
|
||||
|
@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ private:
|
||||
static status_t _WorkerLoopEntry(void* data);
|
||||
status_t _WorkerLoop();
|
||||
|
||||
void _ProcessJobs(Job* waitingJob);
|
||||
void _ProcessJobs();
|
||||
void _AbortJob(Job* job, bool removeFromTable);
|
||||
void _FinishJob(Job* job);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user