f728d212f0
In a private email, Miloslav had agreed that if they had written the test, then it can be licensed bsd-2-clause. I am going to assume this is true as the file names Miloslav as the author. This test was likely sent to tcsh (not netbsd) that had changed bug report systems since. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bin | ||
crypto | ||
dev | ||
fs | ||
games | ||
include | ||
ipf | ||
kernel | ||
lib | ||
libexec | ||
modules | ||
net | ||
rump | ||
sbin | ||
share | ||
sys | ||
usr.bin | ||
usr.sbin | ||
h_macros.h | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile.inc | ||
README |
$NetBSD: README,v 1.4 2012/05/18 15:36:21 jruoho Exp $ When adding new tests, please try to follow the following conventions. 1. For library routines, including system calls, the directory structure of the tests should follow the directory structure of the real source tree. For instance, interfaces available via the C library should follow: src/lib/libc/gen -> src/tests/lib/libc/gen src/lib/libc/sys -> src/tests/lib/libc/sys ... 2. Equivalently, all tests for userland utilities should try to follow their location in the source tree. If this can not be satisfied, the tests for a utility should be located under the directory to which the utility is installed. Thus, a test for env(1) should go to src/tests/usr.bin/env. Likewise, a test for tcpdump(8) should be in src/tests/usr.sbin/tcpdump, even though the source code for the program is located under src/external. 3. Otherwise use your own discretion.