6887492c26
While it's true that it's part of the traditional 4.4BSD security model, there may come a time where a different "primary" security model used for fine-grained privileges (ie., splitting root's responsibilities to various privileges that can be assigned) may want to still have a securelevel setting. Idea from Daniel Carosone: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2006/08/25/0001.html The location of the removed files, for reference, was: src/secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_securelevel.c src/secmodel/bsd44/securelevel.h
6 lines
167 B
Plaintext
6 lines
167 B
Plaintext
# $NetBSD: files.securelevel,v 1.1 2007/11/21 22:49:09 elad Exp $
|
|
|
|
defflag secmodel_securelevel
|
|
|
|
file secmodel/securelevel/secmodel_securelevel.c secmodel_securelevel
|