NetBSD/sys/dev/raidframe/rf_memchunk.c
1999-08-13 03:41:52 +00:00

211 lines
6.0 KiB
C

/* $NetBSD: rf_memchunk.c,v 1.4 1999/08/13 03:41:56 oster Exp $ */
/*
* Copyright (c) 1995 Carnegie-Mellon University.
* All rights reserved.
*
* Author: Mark Holland
*
* Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this software and
* its documentation is hereby granted, provided that both the copyright
* notice and this permission notice appear in all copies of the
* software, derivative works or modified versions, and any portions
* thereof, and that both notices appear in supporting documentation.
*
* CARNEGIE MELLON ALLOWS FREE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE IN ITS "AS IS"
* CONDITION. CARNEGIE MELLON DISCLAIMS ANY LIABILITY OF ANY KIND
* FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*
* Carnegie Mellon requests users of this software to return to
*
* Software Distribution Coordinator or Software.Distribution@CS.CMU.EDU
* School of Computer Science
* Carnegie Mellon University
* Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
*
* any improvements or extensions that they make and grant Carnegie the
* rights to redistribute these changes.
*/
/*********************************************************************************
* rf_memchunk.c
*
* experimental code. I've found that the malloc and free calls in the DAG
* creation code are very expensive. Since for any given workload the DAGs
* created for different accesses are likely to be similar to each other, the
* amount of memory used for any given DAG data structure is likely to be one
* of a small number of values. For example, in UNIX, all reads and writes will
* be less than 8k and will not span stripe unit boundaries. Thus in the absence
* of failure, the only DAGs that will ever get created are single-node reads
* and single-stripe-unit atomic read-modify-writes. So, I'm very likely to
* be continually asking for chunks of memory equal to the sizes of these two
* DAGs.
*
* This leads to the idea of holding on to these chunks of memory when the DAG is
* freed and then, when a new DAG is created, trying to find such a chunk before
* calling malloc.
*
* the "chunk list" is a list of lists. Each header node contains a size value
* and a pointer to a list of chunk descriptors, each of which holds a pointer
* to a chunk of memory of the indicated size.
*
* There is currently no way to purge memory out of the chunk list. My
* initial thought on this is to have a low-priority thread that wakes up every
* 1 or 2 seconds, purges all the chunks with low reuse counts, and sets all
* the reuse counts to zero.
*
* This whole idea may be bad, since malloc may be able to do this more efficiently.
* It's worth a try, though, and it can be turned off by setting useMemChunks to 0.
*
********************************************************************************/
#include "rf_types.h"
#include "rf_threadstuff.h"
#include "rf_debugMem.h"
#include "rf_memchunk.h"
#include "rf_general.h"
#include "rf_options.h"
#include "rf_shutdown.h"
typedef struct RF_ChunkHdr_s RF_ChunkHdr_t;
struct RF_ChunkHdr_s {
int size;
RF_ChunkDesc_t *list;
RF_ChunkHdr_t *next;
};
static RF_ChunkHdr_t *chunklist, *chunk_hdr_free_list;
static RF_ChunkDesc_t *chunk_desc_free_list;
RF_DECLARE_STATIC_MUTEX(chunkmutex)
static void rf_ShutdownMemChunk(void *);
static RF_ChunkDesc_t *NewMemChunk(int, char *);
static void rf_ShutdownMemChunk(ignored)
void *ignored;
{
RF_ChunkDesc_t *pt, *p;
RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr, *ht;
if (rf_memChunkDebug)
printf("Chunklist:\n");
for (hdr = chunklist; hdr;) {
for (p = hdr->list; p;) {
if (rf_memChunkDebug)
printf("Size %d reuse count %d\n", p->size, p->reuse_count);
pt = p;
p = p->next;
RF_Free(pt->buf, pt->size);
RF_Free(pt, sizeof(*pt));
}
ht = hdr;
hdr = hdr->next;
RF_Free(ht, sizeof(*ht));
}
rf_mutex_destroy(&chunkmutex);
}
int
rf_ConfigureMemChunk(listp)
RF_ShutdownList_t **listp;
{
int rc;
chunklist = NULL;
chunk_hdr_free_list = NULL;
chunk_desc_free_list = NULL;
rc = rf_mutex_init(&chunkmutex);
if (rc) {
RF_ERRORMSG3("Unable to init mutex file %s line %d rc=%d\n", __FILE__,
__LINE__, rc);
}
rc = rf_ShutdownCreate(listp, rf_ShutdownMemChunk, NULL);
if (rc) {
RF_ERRORMSG3("Unable to add to shutdown list file %s line %d rc=%d\n", __FILE__,
__LINE__, rc);
rf_mutex_destroy(&chunkmutex);
}
return (rc);
}
/* called to get a chunk descriptor for a newly-allocated chunk of memory
* MUTEX MUST BE LOCKED
*
* free list is not currently used
*/
static RF_ChunkDesc_t *
NewMemChunk(size, buf)
int size;
char *buf;
{
RF_ChunkDesc_t *p;
if (chunk_desc_free_list) {
p = chunk_desc_free_list;
chunk_desc_free_list = p->next;
} else
RF_Malloc(p, sizeof(RF_ChunkDesc_t), (RF_ChunkDesc_t *));
p->size = size;
p->buf = buf;
p->next = NULL;
p->reuse_count = 0;
return (p);
}
/* looks for a chunk of memory of acceptable size. If none, allocates one and returns
* a chunk descriptor for it, but does not install anything in the list. This is done
* when the chunk is released.
*/
RF_ChunkDesc_t *
rf_GetMemChunk(size)
int size;
{
RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr = chunklist;
RF_ChunkDesc_t *p = NULL;
char *buf;
RF_LOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex);
for (hdr = chunklist; hdr; hdr = hdr->next)
if (hdr->size >= size) {
p = hdr->list;
if (p) {
hdr->list = p->next;
p->next = NULL;
p->reuse_count++;
}
break;
}
if (!p) {
RF_Malloc(buf, size, (char *));
p = NewMemChunk(size, buf);
}
RF_UNLOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex);
(void) bzero(p->buf, size);
return (p);
}
void
rf_ReleaseMemChunk(chunk)
RF_ChunkDesc_t *chunk;
{
RF_ChunkHdr_t *hdr, *ht = NULL, *new;
RF_LOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex);
for (hdr = chunklist; hdr && hdr->size < chunk->size; ht = hdr, hdr = hdr->next);
if (hdr && hdr->size == chunk->size) {
chunk->next = hdr->list;
hdr->list = chunk;
} else {
RF_Malloc(new, sizeof(RF_ChunkHdr_t), (RF_ChunkHdr_t *));
new->size = chunk->size;
new->list = chunk;
chunk->next = NULL;
if (ht) {
new->next = ht->next;
ht->next = new;
} else {
new->next = hdr;
chunklist = new;
}
}
RF_UNLOCK_MUTEX(chunkmutex);
}