312 lines
10 KiB
Groff
312 lines
10 KiB
Groff
.\" $NetBSD: openssl_rand.3,v 1.8 2003/07/24 14:16:52 itojun Exp $
|
|
.\"
|
|
.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man version 1.02
|
|
.\" Thu Jul 24 13:08:08 2003
|
|
.\"
|
|
.\" Standard preamble:
|
|
.\" ======================================================================
|
|
.de Sh \" Subsection heading
|
|
.br
|
|
.if t .Sp
|
|
.ne 5
|
|
.PP
|
|
\fB\\$1\fR
|
|
.PP
|
|
..
|
|
.de Sp \" Vertical space (when we can't use .PP)
|
|
.if t .sp .5v
|
|
.if n .sp
|
|
..
|
|
.de Ip \" List item
|
|
.br
|
|
.ie \\n(.$>=3 .ne \\$3
|
|
.el .ne 3
|
|
.IP "\\$1" \\$2
|
|
..
|
|
.de Vb \" Begin verbatim text
|
|
.ft CW
|
|
.nf
|
|
.ne \\$1
|
|
..
|
|
.de Ve \" End verbatim text
|
|
.ft R
|
|
|
|
.fi
|
|
..
|
|
.\" Set up some character translations and predefined strings. \*(-- will
|
|
.\" give an unbreakable dash, \*(PI will give pi, \*(L" will give a left
|
|
.\" double quote, and \*(R" will give a right double quote. | will give a
|
|
.\" real vertical bar. \*(C+ will give a nicer C++. Capital omega is used
|
|
.\" to do unbreakable dashes and therefore won't be available. \*(C` and
|
|
.\" \*(C' expand to `' in nroff, nothing in troff, for use with C<>
|
|
.tr \(*W-|\(bv\*(Tr
|
|
.ds C+ C\v'-.1v'\h'-1p'\s-2+\h'-1p'+\s0\v'.1v'\h'-1p'
|
|
.ie n \{\
|
|
. ds -- \(*W-
|
|
. ds PI pi
|
|
. if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=24u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-12u'-\" diablo 10 pitch
|
|
. if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=20u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-8u'-\" diablo 12 pitch
|
|
. ds L" ""
|
|
. ds R" ""
|
|
. ds C` `
|
|
. ds C' '
|
|
'br\}
|
|
.el\{\
|
|
. ds -- \|\(em\|
|
|
. ds PI \(*p
|
|
. ds L" ``
|
|
. ds R" ''
|
|
'br\}
|
|
.\"
|
|
.\" If the F register is turned on, we'll generate index entries on stderr
|
|
.\" for titles (.TH), headers (.SH), subsections (.Sh), items (.Ip), and
|
|
.\" index entries marked with X<> in POD. Of course, you'll have to process
|
|
.\" the output yourself in some meaningful fashion.
|
|
.if \nF \{\
|
|
. de IX
|
|
. tm Index:\\$1\t\\n%\t"\\$2"
|
|
. .
|
|
. nr % 0
|
|
. rr F
|
|
.\}
|
|
.\"
|
|
.\" For nroff, turn off justification. Always turn off hyphenation; it
|
|
.\" makes way too many mistakes in technical documents.
|
|
.hy 0
|
|
.if n .na
|
|
.\"
|
|
.\" Accent mark definitions (@(#)ms.acc 1.5 88/02/08 SMI; from UCB 4.2).
|
|
.\" Fear. Run. Save yourself. No user-serviceable parts.
|
|
.bd B 3
|
|
. \" fudge factors for nroff and troff
|
|
.if n \{\
|
|
. ds #H 0
|
|
. ds #V .8m
|
|
. ds #F .3m
|
|
. ds #[ \f1
|
|
. ds #] \fP
|
|
.\}
|
|
.if t \{\
|
|
. ds #H ((1u-(\\\\n(.fu%2u))*.13m)
|
|
. ds #V .6m
|
|
. ds #F 0
|
|
. ds #[ \&
|
|
. ds #] \&
|
|
.\}
|
|
. \" simple accents for nroff and troff
|
|
.if n \{\
|
|
. ds ' \&
|
|
. ds ` \&
|
|
. ds ^ \&
|
|
. ds , \&
|
|
. ds ~ ~
|
|
. ds /
|
|
.\}
|
|
.if t \{\
|
|
. ds ' \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\'\h"|\\n:u"
|
|
. ds ` \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\`\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
. ds ^ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*10/11-\*(#H)'^\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
. ds , \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10)',\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
. ds ~ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu-\*(#H-.1m)'~\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
. ds / \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\z\(sl\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
.\}
|
|
. \" troff and (daisy-wheel) nroff accents
|
|
.ds : \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H+.1m+\*(#F)'\v'-\*(#V'\z.\h'.2m+\*(#F'.\h'|\\n:u'\v'\*(#V'
|
|
.ds 8 \h'\*(#H'\(*b\h'-\*(#H'
|
|
.ds o \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu+\w'\(de'u-\*(#H)/2u'\v'-.3n'\*(#[\z\(de\v'.3n'\h'|\\n:u'\*(#]
|
|
.ds d- \h'\*(#H'\(pd\h'-\w'~'u'\v'-.25m'\f2\(hy\fP\v'.25m'\h'-\*(#H'
|
|
.ds D- D\\k:\h'-\w'D'u'\v'-.11m'\z\(hy\v'.11m'\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
.ds th \*(#[\v'.3m'\s+1I\s-1\v'-.3m'\h'-(\w'I'u*2/3)'\s-1o\s+1\*(#]
|
|
.ds Th \*(#[\s+2I\s-2\h'-\w'I'u*3/5'\v'-.3m'o\v'.3m'\*(#]
|
|
.ds ae a\h'-(\w'a'u*4/10)'e
|
|
.ds Ae A\h'-(\w'A'u*4/10)'E
|
|
. \" corrections for vroff
|
|
.if v .ds ~ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*9/10-\*(#H)'\s-2\u~\d\s+2\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
.if v .ds ^ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*10/11-\*(#H)'\v'-.4m'^\v'.4m'\h'|\\n:u'
|
|
. \" for low resolution devices (crt and lpr)
|
|
.if \n(.H>23 .if \n(.V>19 \
|
|
\{\
|
|
. ds : e
|
|
. ds 8 ss
|
|
. ds o a
|
|
. ds d- d\h'-1'\(ga
|
|
. ds D- D\h'-1'\(hy
|
|
. ds th \o'bp'
|
|
. ds Th \o'LP'
|
|
. ds ae ae
|
|
. ds Ae AE
|
|
.\}
|
|
.rm #[ #] #H #V #F C
|
|
.\" ======================================================================
|
|
.\"
|
|
.IX Title "rand 3"
|
|
.TH rand 3 "0.9.7b" "2002-08-06" "OpenSSL"
|
|
.UC
|
|
.SH "NAME"
|
|
rand \- pseudo-random number generator
|
|
.SH "LIBRARY"
|
|
libcrypto, -lcrypto
|
|
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
|
|
.IX Header "SYNOPSIS"
|
|
.Vb 1
|
|
\& #include <openssl/rand.h>
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 1
|
|
\& int RAND_set_rand_engine(ENGINE *engine);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 2
|
|
\& int RAND_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num);
|
|
\& int RAND_pseudo_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 3
|
|
\& void RAND_seed(const void *buf, int num);
|
|
\& void RAND_add(const void *buf, int num, int entropy);
|
|
\& int RAND_status(void);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 3
|
|
\& int RAND_load_file(const char *file, long max_bytes);
|
|
\& int RAND_write_file(const char *file);
|
|
\& const char *RAND_file_name(char *file, size_t num);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 1
|
|
\& int RAND_egd(const char *path);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 3
|
|
\& void RAND_set_rand_method(const RAND_METHOD *meth);
|
|
\& const RAND_METHOD *RAND_get_rand_method(void);
|
|
\& RAND_METHOD *RAND_SSLeay(void);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 1
|
|
\& void RAND_cleanup(void);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.Vb 3
|
|
\& /* For Win32 only */
|
|
\& void RAND_screen(void);
|
|
\& int RAND_event(UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM);
|
|
.Ve
|
|
.SH "DESCRIPTION"
|
|
.IX Header "DESCRIPTION"
|
|
Since the introduction of the \s-1ENGINE\s0 \s-1API\s0, the recommended way of controlling
|
|
default implementations is by using the \s-1ENGINE\s0 \s-1API\s0 functions. The default
|
|
\&\fB\s-1RAND_METHOD\s0\fR, as set by \fIRAND_set_rand_method()\fR and returned by
|
|
\&\fIRAND_get_rand_method()\fR, is only used if no \s-1ENGINE\s0 has been set as the default
|
|
\&\*(L"rand\*(R" implementation. Hence, these two functions are no longer the recommened
|
|
way to control defaults.
|
|
.PP
|
|
If an alternative \fB\s-1RAND_METHOD\s0\fR implementation is being used (either set
|
|
directly or as provided by an \s-1ENGINE\s0 module), then it is entirely responsible
|
|
for the generation and management of a cryptographically secure \s-1PRNG\s0 stream. The
|
|
mechanisms described below relate solely to the software \s-1PRNG\s0 implementation
|
|
built in to OpenSSL and used by default.
|
|
.PP
|
|
These functions implement a cryptographically secure pseudo-random
|
|
number generator (\s-1PRNG\s0). It is used by other library functions for
|
|
example to generate random keys, and applications can use it when they
|
|
need randomness.
|
|
.PP
|
|
A cryptographic \s-1PRNG\s0 must be seeded with unpredictable data such as
|
|
mouse movements or keys pressed at random by the user. This is
|
|
described in RAND_add(3). Its state can be saved in a seed file
|
|
(see RAND_load_file(3)) to avoid having to go through the
|
|
seeding process whenever the application is started.
|
|
.PP
|
|
RAND_bytes(3) describes how to obtain random data from the
|
|
\&\s-1PRNG\s0.
|
|
.SH "INTERNALS"
|
|
.IX Header "INTERNALS"
|
|
The \fIRAND_SSLeay()\fR method implements a \s-1PRNG\s0 based on a cryptographic
|
|
hash function.
|
|
.PP
|
|
The following description of its design is based on the SSLeay
|
|
documentation:
|
|
.PP
|
|
First up I will state the things I believe I need for a good \s-1RNG\s0.
|
|
.Ip "1" 4
|
|
.IX Item "1"
|
|
A good hashing algorithm to mix things up and to convert the \s-1RNG\s0 'state'
|
|
to random numbers.
|
|
.Ip "2" 4
|
|
.IX Item "2"
|
|
An initial source of random 'state'.
|
|
.Ip "3" 4
|
|
.IX Item "3"
|
|
The state should be very large. If the \s-1RNG\s0 is being used to generate
|
|
4096 bit \s-1RSA\s0 keys, 2 2048 bit random strings are required (at a minimum).
|
|
If your \s-1RNG\s0 state only has 128 bits, you are obviously limiting the
|
|
search space to 128 bits, not 2048. I'm probably getting a little
|
|
carried away on this last point but it does indicate that it may not be
|
|
a bad idea to keep quite a lot of \s-1RNG\s0 state. It should be easier to
|
|
break a cipher than guess the \s-1RNG\s0 seed data.
|
|
.Ip "4" 4
|
|
.IX Item "4"
|
|
Any \s-1RNG\s0 seed data should influence all subsequent random numbers
|
|
generated. This implies that any random seed data entered will have
|
|
an influence on all subsequent random numbers generated.
|
|
.Ip "5" 4
|
|
.IX Item "5"
|
|
When using data to seed the \s-1RNG\s0 state, the data used should not be
|
|
extractable from the \s-1RNG\s0 state. I believe this should be a
|
|
requirement because one possible source of 'secret' semi random
|
|
data would be a private key or a password. This data must
|
|
not be disclosed by either subsequent random numbers or a
|
|
\&'core' dump left by a program crash.
|
|
.Ip "6" 4
|
|
.IX Item "6"
|
|
Given the same initial 'state', 2 systems should deviate in their \s-1RNG\s0 state
|
|
(and hence the random numbers generated) over time if at all possible.
|
|
.Ip "7" 4
|
|
.IX Item "7"
|
|
Given the random number output stream, it should not be possible to determine
|
|
the \s-1RNG\s0 state or the next random number.
|
|
.PP
|
|
The algorithm is as follows.
|
|
.PP
|
|
There is global state made up of a 1023 byte buffer (the 'state'), a
|
|
working hash value ('md'), and a counter ('count').
|
|
.PP
|
|
Whenever seed data is added, it is inserted into the 'state' as
|
|
follows.
|
|
.PP
|
|
The input is chopped up into units of 20 bytes (or less for
|
|
the last block). Each of these blocks is run through the hash
|
|
function as follows: The data passed to the hash function
|
|
is the current 'md', the same number of bytes from the 'state'
|
|
(the location determined by in incremented looping index) as
|
|
the current 'block', the new key data 'block', and 'count'
|
|
(which is incremented after each use).
|
|
The result of this is kept in 'md' and also xored into the
|
|
\&'state' at the same locations that were used as input into the
|
|
hash function. I
|
|
believe this system addresses points 1 (hash function; currently
|
|
\&\s-1SHA-1\s0), 3 (the 'state'), 4 (via the 'md'), 5 (by the use of a hash
|
|
function and xor).
|
|
.PP
|
|
When bytes are extracted from the \s-1RNG\s0, the following process is used.
|
|
For each group of 10 bytes (or less), we do the following:
|
|
.PP
|
|
Input into the hash function the local 'md' (which is initialized from
|
|
the global 'md' before any bytes are generated), the bytes that are to
|
|
be overwritten by the random bytes, and bytes from the 'state'
|
|
(incrementing looping index). From this digest output (which is kept
|
|
in 'md'), the top (up to) 10 bytes are returned to the caller and the
|
|
bottom 10 bytes are xored into the 'state'.
|
|
.PP
|
|
Finally, after we have finished 'num' random bytes for the caller,
|
|
\&'count' (which is incremented) and the local and global 'md' are fed
|
|
into the hash function and the results are kept in the global 'md'.
|
|
.PP
|
|
I believe the above addressed points 1 (use of \s-1SHA-1\s0), 6 (by hashing
|
|
into the 'state' the 'old' data from the caller that is about to be
|
|
overwritten) and 7 (by not using the 10 bytes given to the caller to
|
|
update the 'state', but they are used to update 'md').
|
|
.PP
|
|
So of the points raised, only 2 is not addressed (but see
|
|
RAND_add(3)).
|
|
.SH "SEE ALSO"
|
|
.IX Header "SEE ALSO"
|
|
BN_rand(3), RAND_add(3),
|
|
RAND_load_file(3), RAND_egd(3),
|
|
RAND_bytes(3),
|
|
RAND_set_rand_method(3),
|
|
RAND_cleanup(3)
|