226 lines
8.2 KiB
C
226 lines
8.2 KiB
C
/* $NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.7 2008/04/28 20:23:01 martin Exp $ */
|
|
|
|
/*-
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2001, 2007 The NetBSD Foundation, Inc.
|
|
* All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* This code is derived from software contributed to The NetBSD Foundation
|
|
* by Nathan J. Williams, and by Andrew Doran.
|
|
*
|
|
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
|
|
* are met:
|
|
* 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
* 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
|
|
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
|
|
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
*
|
|
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE NETBSD FOUNDATION, INC. AND CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
* ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED
|
|
* TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR
|
|
* PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE FOUNDATION OR CONTRIBUTORS
|
|
* BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
|
|
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
|
|
* SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
|
|
* INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
|
|
* CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
|
|
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
|
|
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <sys/cdefs.h>
|
|
__RCSID("$NetBSD: pthread_tsd.c,v 1.7 2008/04/28 20:23:01 martin Exp $");
|
|
|
|
/* Functions and structures dealing with thread-specific data */
|
|
#include <errno.h>
|
|
|
|
#include "pthread.h"
|
|
#include "pthread_int.h"
|
|
|
|
static pthread_mutex_t tsd_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
|
|
static int nextkey;
|
|
void *pthread__tsd_alloc[PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX];
|
|
void (*pthread__tsd_destructors[PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX])(void *);
|
|
|
|
__strong_alias(__libc_thr_keycreate,pthread_key_create)
|
|
__strong_alias(__libc_thr_keydelete,pthread_key_delete)
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
pthread_key_create(pthread_key_t *key, void (*destructor)(void *))
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
/* Get a lock on the allocation list */
|
|
pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
|
|
/* Find an available slot */
|
|
/* 1. Search from "nextkey" to the end of the list. */
|
|
for (i = nextkey; i < PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX; i++)
|
|
if (pthread__tsd_alloc[i] == NULL)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (i == PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX) {
|
|
/* 2. If that didn't work, search from the start
|
|
* of the list back to "nextkey".
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 0; i < nextkey; i++)
|
|
if (pthread__tsd_alloc[i] == NULL)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
if (i == nextkey) {
|
|
/* If we didn't find one here, there isn't one
|
|
* to be found.
|
|
*/
|
|
pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
return EAGAIN;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Got one. */
|
|
pthread__tsd_alloc[i] = (void *)__builtin_return_address(0);
|
|
nextkey = (i + 1) % PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX;
|
|
pthread__tsd_destructors[i] = destructor;
|
|
pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
*key = i;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int
|
|
pthread_key_delete(pthread_key_t key)
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is tricky. The standard says of pthread_key_create()
|
|
* that new keys have the value NULL associated with them in
|
|
* all threads. According to people who were present at the
|
|
* standardization meeting, that requirement was written
|
|
* before pthread_key_delete() was introduced, and not
|
|
* reconsidered when it was.
|
|
*
|
|
* See David Butenhof's article in comp.programming.threads:
|
|
* Subject: Re: TSD key reusing issue
|
|
* Message-ID: <u97d8.29$fL6.200@news.cpqcorp.net>
|
|
* Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:06:17 -0500
|
|
* http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=u97d8.29%24fL6.200%40news.cpqcorp.net
|
|
*
|
|
* Given:
|
|
*
|
|
* 1: Applications are not required to clear keys in all
|
|
* threads before calling pthread_key_delete().
|
|
* 2: Clearing pointers without running destructors is a
|
|
* memory leak.
|
|
* 3: The pthread_key_delete() function is expressly forbidden
|
|
* to run any destructors.
|
|
*
|
|
* Option 1: Make this function effectively a no-op and
|
|
* prohibit key reuse. This is a possible resource-exhaustion
|
|
* problem given that we have a static storage area for keys,
|
|
* but having a non-static storage area would make
|
|
* pthread_setspecific() expensive (might need to realloc the
|
|
* TSD array).
|
|
*
|
|
* Option 2: Ignore the specified behavior of
|
|
* pthread_key_create() and leave the old values. If an
|
|
* application deletes a key that still has non-NULL values in
|
|
* some threads... it's probably a memory leak and hence
|
|
* incorrect anyway, and we're within our rights to let the
|
|
* application lose. However, it's possible (if unlikely) that
|
|
* the application is storing pointers to non-heap data, or
|
|
* non-pointers that have been wedged into a void pointer, so
|
|
* we can't entirely write off such applications as incorrect.
|
|
* This could also lead to running (new) destructors on old
|
|
* data that was never supposed to be associated with that
|
|
* destructor.
|
|
*
|
|
* Option 3: Follow the specified behavior of
|
|
* pthread_key_create(). Either pthread_key_create() or
|
|
* pthread_key_delete() would then have to clear the values in
|
|
* every thread's slot for that key. In order to guarantee the
|
|
* visibility of the NULL value in other threads, there would
|
|
* have to be synchronization operations in both the clearer
|
|
* and pthread_getspecific(). Putting synchronization in
|
|
* pthread_getspecific() is a big performance lose. But in
|
|
* reality, only (buggy) reuse of an old key would require
|
|
* this synchronization; for a new key, there has to be a
|
|
* memory-visibility propagating event between the call to
|
|
* pthread_key_create() and pthread_getspecific() with that
|
|
* key, so setting the entries to NULL without synchronization
|
|
* will work, subject to problem (2) above. However, it's kind
|
|
* of slow.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that the argument in option 3 only applies because we
|
|
* keep TSD in ordinary memory which follows the pthreads
|
|
* visibility rules. The visibility rules are not required by
|
|
* the standard to apply to TSD, so the argument doesn't
|
|
* apply in general, just to this implementation.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* For the momemt, we're going with option 1. */
|
|
pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
pthread__tsd_destructors[key] = NULL;
|
|
pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Perform thread-exit-time destruction of thread-specific data. */
|
|
void
|
|
pthread__destroy_tsd(pthread_t self)
|
|
{
|
|
int i, done, iterations;
|
|
void *val;
|
|
void (*destructor)(void *);
|
|
|
|
if (!self->pt_havespecific)
|
|
return;
|
|
pthread_mutex_unlock(&self->pt_lock);
|
|
|
|
/* Butenhof, section 5.4.2 (page 167):
|
|
*
|
|
* ``Also, Pthreads sets the thread-specific data value for a
|
|
* key to NULL before calling that key's destructor (passing
|
|
* the previous value of the key) when a thread terminates [*].
|
|
* ...
|
|
* [*] That is, unfortunately, not what the standard
|
|
* says. This is one of the problems with formal standards -
|
|
* they say what they say, not what they were intended to
|
|
* say. Somehow, an error crept in, and the sentence
|
|
* specifying that "the implementation clears the
|
|
* thread-specific data value before calling the destructor"
|
|
* was deleted. Nobody noticed, and the standard was approved
|
|
* with the error. So the standard says (by omission) that if
|
|
* you want to write a portable application using
|
|
* thread-specific data, that will not hang on thread
|
|
* termination, you must call pthread_setspecific within your
|
|
* destructor function to change the value to NULL. This would
|
|
* be silly, and any serious implementation of Pthreads will
|
|
* violate the standard in this respect. Of course, the
|
|
* standard will be fixed, probably by the 1003.1n amendment
|
|
* (assorted corrections to 1003.1c-1995), but that will take
|
|
* a while.''
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
iterations = 4; /* We're not required to try very hard */
|
|
do {
|
|
done = 1;
|
|
for (i = 0; i < PTHREAD_KEYS_MAX; i++) {
|
|
if (self->pt_specific[i] != NULL) {
|
|
pthread_mutex_lock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
destructor = pthread__tsd_destructors[i];
|
|
pthread_mutex_unlock(&tsd_mutex);
|
|
if (destructor != NULL) {
|
|
done = 0;
|
|
val = self->pt_specific[i];
|
|
self->pt_specific[i] = NULL; /* see above */
|
|
(*destructor)(val);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} while (!done && iterations--);
|
|
|
|
self->pt_havespecific = 0;
|
|
pthread_mutex_lock(&self->pt_lock);
|
|
}
|