NetBSD/sys/coda
gdt 6fbdb2adf5 In coda_lookup, add LK_RETRY to locking of child vnode. The previous
code paniced if the first attempt to lock the vnode failed, and such
failures are not errors - just cause to wait.  gdt was regularly
hitting this panic.

Correct one of two identical panic messages.

Add XXX comments about

  ISDOTDOT locking rules not being followed

  questioning the practice of unlocking parent before locking child.
  (But, given that the vnode is referenced, it can't be deleted, so
  maybe this is fine.)

  Why is failured to unlock not a panic but failure to lock is?
2006-01-12 14:57:06 +00:00
..
00READ insert newlines to the MAKEDEV section, so that it's more clear 2002-12-26 13:20:44 +00:00
README Pass2 complete 1998-09-08 17:12:46 +00:00
TODO Pass2 complete 1998-09-08 17:12:46 +00:00
cnode.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda.h __inline__ -> inline 2005-12-24 23:41:33 +00:00
coda_io.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_kernel.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_namecache.c merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_namecache.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_opstats.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_pioctl.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_psdev.c merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_subr.c merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_subr.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_venus.c merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_venus.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_vfsops.c merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_vfsops.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
coda_vnops.c In coda_lookup, add LK_RETRY to locking of child vnode. The previous 2006-01-12 14:57:06 +00:00
coda_vnops.h merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00
files.coda merge ktrace-lwp. 2005-12-11 12:16:03 +00:00

README

                Announcing the Availability of the
                        Coda Distributed
                           Filesystem
                              for
                         BSD Unix Systems

        Coda is a distributed file system like NFS and AFS.  It is
freely available, like NFS.  But it functions much like AFS in being a
"stateful" file system.  Coda and AFS cache files on your local
machine to improve performance.  But Coda goes a step further than AFS
by letting you access the cached files when there is no available
network, viz. disconnected laptops and network outages.  In Coda, both
the client and server are outside the kernel which makes them easier
to experiment with.

To get more information on Coda, I would like to refer people to
        http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
There is a wealth of documents, papers, and theses there.  There is
also a good introduction to the Coda File System in
        http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu/ljpaper/lj.html

Coda was originally developed as an academic prototype/testbed.  It is
being polished and rewritten where necessary.  Coda is a work in
progress and does have bugs.  It is, though, very usable.  Our
interest is in making Coda available to as many people as possible and
to have Coda evolve and flourish.

The bulk of the Coda file system code supports the Coda client
program, the Coda server program and the utilities needed by both.
All these programs are unix programs and can run equally well on any
Unix platform.  Our main development thrust is improving these
programs.  There is a small part of Coda that deals with the kernel to
file system interface.  This code is OS specific (but should not be
platform specific).

Coda is currently available for several OS's and platforms:
        Freebsd-2.2.5: i386
        Freebsd-2.2.6: i386
	Freebsd -current: i386
        linux 2.0: i386 & sparc
        linux 2.1: i386 & sparc
        NetBSD 1.3: i386
	NetBSD -current: i386
The relevant sources, binaries, and docs can be found in
        ftp://ftp.coda.cs.cmu.edu/pub/coda/

We intend to come out with new Coda releases often, not daily.  We
don't want to slight any OS/platform not mentioned above.  We are just
limited in our resources as to what we can support internally.  We
will be happy to integrate OpenBSD support as well as other OS
support.  Also, adding platform support should be relatively easy and
we can discuss this.  The only difficulty is that Coda has a light weight
process package.  It does some manipulations in assembler which would
have to be redone for a different platform.

There are several mailing lists @coda.cs.cmu.edu that discuss coda:
coda-announce and linux-coda.  We are going to revise linux-coda to be
OS neutral, since it is mainly Coda we want to discuss.  We appreciate
comments, feedback, bug reports, bug fixes, enhancements, etc.