sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.101
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.102
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_inode.c: revision 1.158
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_inode.h: revision 1.25
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_balloc.c: revision 1.95
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_pages.c: revision 1.21
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.330
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_alloc.c: revision 1.140 (patch)
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_alloc.c: revision 1.141 (patch)
lib/libp2k/p2k.c: revision 1.72
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.205
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.206
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_segment.c: revision 1.284
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs.h: revision 1.207
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_segment.c: revision 1.285
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_debug.c: revision 1.55
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_rename.c: revision 1.23
usr.sbin/dumplfs/dumplfs.c: revision 1.65
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.371
sys/arch/i386/stand/efiboot/bootx64/Makefile: revision 1.3
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.372
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.373
sbin/fsck_lfs/pass1.c: revision 1.46
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.326
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.327
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vfsops.c: revision 1.375 (patch)
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.328
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.98
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.116
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_vnops.c: revision 1.329
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.99
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.117
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_accessors.h: revision 1.49
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_extern.h: revision 1.118
sys/rump/fs/lib/liblfs/Makefile: revision 1.15
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_bio.c: revision 1.146 (patch)
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_bio.c: revision 1.147
sys/ufs/lfs/lfs_subr.c: revision 1.100
Fix kassert in lfs by initializing vp first.
Use a marker node to iterate lfs_dchainhd / i_lfs_dchain.
I believe elements can be removed while the lock is dropped,
including the next node we're hanging on to.
Just use VOP_BWRITE for lfs_bwrite_log.
Hope this doesn't cause trouble with vfs_suspend.
Teach lfs to transition ro<->rw.
Prevent new dirops while we issue lfs_flush_dirops.
lfs_flush_dirops assumes (by KASSERT((ip->i_state & IN_ADIROP) == 0))
that vnodes on the dchain will not become involved in active dirops
even while holding no other locks (lfs_lock, v_interlock), so we must
set lfs_writer here. All other callers already set lfs_writer.
We set fs->lfs_writer++ without explicitly doing lfs_writer_enter
because
(a) we already waited for the dirops to drain, and
(b) we hold lfs_lock and cannot drop it before setting lfs_writer.
Assert lfs_writer where I think we can now prove it.
Serialize access to the splay tree with lfs_lock.
Change some cheap KDASSERT into KASSERT.
Take a reference and fix assertions in lfs_flush_dirops.
Fixes panic:
KASSERT((ip->i_state & IN_ADIROP) == 0) at lfs_vnops.c:1670
lfs_flush_dirops
lfs_check
lfs_setattr
VOP_SETATTR
change_mode
sys_fchmod
syscall
This assertion -- and the assertion that vp->v_uflag has VU_DIROP set
-- is valid only until we release lfs_lock, because we may race with
lfs_unmark_dirop which will remove the nodes and change the flags.
Further, vp itself is valid only as long as it is referenced, which it
is as long as it's on the dchain, but lfs_unmark_dirop drops the
dchain's reference.
Don't lfs_writer_enter while holding v_interlock.
There's no need to lfs_writer_enter at all here, as far as I can see.
lfs_flush_fs will do it for us.
Break deadlock in PR kern/52301.
The lock order is lfs_writer -> lfs_seglock. The problem in 52301 is
that lfs_segwrite violates this lock order by sometimes doing
lfs_seglock -> lfs_writer, either (a) when doing a checkpoint or (b),
opportunistically, when there are no dirops pending. Both cases can
deadlock, because dirops sometimes take the seglock (lfs_truncate,
lfs_valloc, lfs_vfree):
(a) There may be dirops pending, and they may be waiting for the
seglock, so we can't wait for them to complete while holding the
seglock.
(b) The test for fs->lfs_dirops == 0 happens unlocked, and the state
may change by the time lfs_writer_enter acquires lfs_lock.
To resolve this in each case:
(a) Do lfs_writer_enter before lfs_seglock, since we will need it
unconditionally anyway. The worst performance impact of this should
be that some dirops get delayed a little bit.
(b) Create a new lfs_writer_tryenter to use at this point so that the
test for fs->lfs_dirops == 0 and the acquisition of lfs_writer happen
atomically under lfs_lock.
Initialize/destroy lfs_allclean_wakeup in modcmd, not lfs_mountfs.
Fixes reloading lfs.kmod.
In lfs_update, hold lfs_writer around lfs_vflush.
Otherwise, we might do
lfs_vflush
-> lfs_seglock
-> lfs_segwait(SEGM_CKP)
-> lfs_writer_enter
which is the reverse of the lfs_writer -> lfs_seglock ordering.
Call lfs_orphan in lfs_rename while we're still in the dirop.
lfs_writer_enter can't fail; keep it simple and don't pretend it can.
Assert that mtsleep can't fail either -- it doesn't catch signals and
there's no timeout.
Teach LFS_ORPHAN_NEXTFREE about lfs64.
Dust off the orphan detection code and try to make it work.
Fix !DIAGNOSTIC compile
Fix userland references to LFS_ORPHAN_NEXTFREE.
Forgot to grep for these or do a full distribution build, oops!
Fix missing <sys/evcnt.h> by removing the evcnts instead.
Just wanted to confirm that a race might happen, and indeed it did.
These serve little diagnostic value otherwise.
OR into bp->b_cflags; don't overwrite.
CTASSERT lfs on-disk structure sizes.
Avoid misaligned access to lfs64 on-disk records in memory.
lfs64 directory entries are only 32-bit aligned in order to conserve
space in directory blocks, and we had a hack to stuff a 64-bit inode
in them. This replaces the hack by __aligned(4) __packed, and goes
further:
1. It's not clear that all the other lfs64 data structures are 64-bit
aligned on disk to begin with. We can go through these later and
upgrade them from
struct foo64 {
...
} __aligned(4) __packed;
union foo {
struct foo64 f64;
...
};
to
struct foo64 {
...
};
union foo {
struct foo64 f64 __aligned(8);
...
} __aligned(4) __packed;
if we really want to take advantage of 64-bit memory accesses.
However, the __aligned(4) __packed must remain on the union
because:
2. We access even the lfs32 data structures via a union that has
lfs64 members, and it turns out that compilers will assume access
through a union with 64-bit aligned members implies the whole
union has 64-bit alignment, even if we're only accessing a 32-bit
aligned member.
Fix clang build after packed lfs64 accessor change.
Suppress spurious address-of-packed error in rump lfs too.
518fcb3c7b