cb93b81028
right now. new address-of-packed-member and format-overflow warnings have new GCC_NO_ADDR_OF_PACKED_MEMBER amd GCC_NO_FORMAT_OVERFLOW variables to remove these warnings. apply to a bunch of the tree. mostly, these are real bugs that should be fixed, but in many cases, only by removing the 'packed' attribute from some structure that doesn't really need it. (i looked at many different ones, and while perhaps 60-80% were already properly aligned, it wasn't clear to me that the uses were always coming from sane data vs network alignment, so it doesn't seem safe to remove packed without careful research for each affect struct.) clang already warned (and was not erroring) for many of these cases, but gcc picked up dozens more. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| bin | ||
| crypto | ||
| dev | ||
| fs | ||
| games | ||
| include | ||
| ipf | ||
| kernel | ||
| lib | ||
| libexec | ||
| modules | ||
| net | ||
| rump | ||
| sbin | ||
| share | ||
| sys | ||
| usr.bin | ||
| usr.sbin | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.inc | ||
| README | ||
| h_macros.h | ||
README
$NetBSD: README,v 1.4 2012/05/18 15:36:21 jruoho Exp $ When adding new tests, please try to follow the following conventions. 1. For library routines, including system calls, the directory structure of the tests should follow the directory structure of the real source tree. For instance, interfaces available via the C library should follow: src/lib/libc/gen -> src/tests/lib/libc/gen src/lib/libc/sys -> src/tests/lib/libc/sys ... 2. Equivalently, all tests for userland utilities should try to follow their location in the source tree. If this can not be satisfied, the tests for a utility should be located under the directory to which the utility is installed. Thus, a test for env(1) should go to src/tests/usr.bin/env. Likewise, a test for tcpdump(8) should be in src/tests/usr.sbin/tcpdump, even though the source code for the program is located under src/external. 3. Otherwise use your own discretion.