$NetBSD: README,v 1.4 1996/05/20 00:41:01 fvdl Exp $
@(#) Header: README,v 1.39 94/06/20 20:15:16 leres Exp (LBL)
TCPDUMP 3.0.4
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Network Research Group
tcpdump@ee.lbl.gov
ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/tcpdump-*.tar.Z
This directory contains source code for tcpdump, a tool for network
monitoring and data acquisition. The original distribution is
available via anonymous ftp to ftp.ee.lbl.gov, in tcpdump-*.tar.Z.
Tcpdump now uses libcap, a system-independent interface for
user-level packet capture. Before building tcpdump, you must
first retrieve and build libpcap, also from LBL, in:
ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/libpcap-*.tar.Z.
Once libpcap is built (either install it or make sure it's in
../libpcap), you can build tcpdump using the procedure in the INSTALL
file.
Tcpdump and libpcap have been built and tested under SGI Irix 4.x & 5.2,
SunOS 4.x, Solaris 2.3, BSD/386 v1.1, DEC/OSF v1.3 v2.0, and Ultrix 4.x.
SunOS 3.5, 4.3BSD Reno/Tahoe and 4.4BSD are supported as well, but we
currently do not have the resources to carry out testing in these
environments (we suspect you'll run into problems building the most
recent version under these systems -- please send us the patches if
you fix any porting problems).
Tcpdump has reportedly been ported to Mach 3.0 and Linux, but we have
not received patches to integrate back into the master source tree.
The program is loosely based on SMI's "etherfind" although none
of the etherfind code remains. It was originally written by Van
Jacobson as part of an ongoing research project to investigate and
improve tcp and internet gateway performance. The parts of the
program originally taken from Sun's etherfind were later re-written
by Steven McCanne of LBL. To insure that there would be no vestige
of proprietary code in tcpdump, Steve wrote these pieces from the
specification given by the manual entry, with no access to the
source of tcpdump or etherfind.
Over the past few years, tcpdump has been steadily improved
by the excellent contributions from the Internet community
(just browse through the CHANGES file). We are grateful for
all the input.
Richard Stevens gives an excellent treatment of the Internet
protocols in his book ``TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 1''.
If you want to learn more about tcpdump and how to interpret
it's output, pick up this book.
Problems, bugs, questions, desirable enhancements, etc., should be
sent to the email address "tcpdump@ee.lbl.gov".
- Steve McCanne (mccanne@ee.lbl.gov)
Craig Leres (leres@ee.lbl.gov)
Van Jacobson (van@ee.lbl.gov)
-------------------------------------
This directory also contains some short awk programs intended as
examples of ways to reduce tcpdump data when you're tracking
particular network problems:
send-ack.awk
Simplifies the tcpdump trace for an ftp (or other unidirectional
tcp transfer). Since we assume that one host only sends and
the other only acks, all address information is left off and
we just note if the packet is a "send" or an "ack".
There is one output line per line of the original trace.
Field 1 is the packet time in decimal seconds, relative
to the start of the conversation. Field 2 is delta-time
from last packet. Field 3 is packet type/direction.
"Send" means data going from sender to receiver, "ack"
means an ack going from the receiver to the sender. A
preceding "*" indicates that the data is a retransmission.
A preceding "-" indicates a hole in the sequence space
(i.e., missing packet(s)), a "#" means an odd-size (not max
seg size) packet. Field 4 has the packet flags
(same format as raw trace). Field 5 is the sequence
number (start seq. num for sender, next expected seq number
for acks). The number in parens following an ack is
the delta-time from the first send of the packet to the
ack. A number in parens following a send is the
delta-time from the first send of the packet to the
current send (on duplicate packets only). Duplicate
sends or acks have a number in square brackets showing
the number of duplicates so far.
Here is a short sample from near the start of an ftp:
3.00 0.20 send . 512
3.20 0.20 ack . 1024 (0.20)
3.20 0.00 send P 1024
3.40 0.20 ack . 1536 (0.20)
3.80 0.40 * send . 0 (3.80) [2]
3.82 0.02 * ack . 1536 (0.62) [2]
Three seconds into the conversation, bytes 512 through 1023
were sent. 200ms later they were acked. Shortly thereafter
bytes 1024-1535 were sent and again acked after 200ms.
Then, for no apparent reason, 0-511 is retransmitted, 3.8
seconds after its initial send (the round trip time for this
ftp was 1sec, +-500ms). Since the receiver is expecting
1536, 1536 is re-acked when 0 arrives.
packetdat.awk
Computes chunk summary data for an ftp (or similar
unidirectional tcp transfer). [A "chunk" refers to
a chunk of the sequence space -- essentially the packet
sequence number divided by the max segment size.]
A summary line is printed showing the number of chunks,
the number of packets it took to send that many chunks
(if there are no lost or duplicated packets, the number
of packets should equal the number of chunks) and the
number of acks.
Following the summary line is one line of information
per chunk. The line contains eight fields:
1 - the chunk number
2 - the start sequence number for this chunk
3 - time of first send
4 - time of last send
5 - time of first ack
6 - time of last ack
7 - number of times chunk was sent
8 - number of times chunk was acked
(all times are in decimal seconds, relative to the start
of the conversation.)
As an example, here is the first part of the output for
an ftp trace:
# 134 chunks. 536 packets sent. 508 acks.
1 1 0.00 5.80 0.20 0.20 4 1
2 513 0.28 6.20 0.40 0.40 4 1
3 1025 1.16 6.32 1.20 1.20 4 1
4 1561 1.86 15.00 2.00 2.00 6 1
5 2049 2.16 15.44 2.20 2.20 5 1
6 2585 2.64 16.44 2.80 2.80 5 1
7 3073 3.00 16.66 3.20 3.20 4 1
8 3609 3.20 17.24 3.40 5.82 4 11
9 4097 6.02 6.58 6.20 6.80 2 5
This says that 134 chunks were transferred (about 70K
since the average packet size was 512 bytes). It took
536 packets to transfer the data (i.e., on the average
each chunk was transmitted four times). Looking at,
say, chunk 4, we see it represents the 512 bytes of
sequence space from 1561 to 2048. It was first sent
1.86 seconds into the conversation. It was last
sent 15 seconds into the conversation and was sent
a total of 6 times (i.e., it was retransmitted every
2 seconds on the average). It was acked once, 140ms
after it first arrived.
stime.awk
atime.awk
Output one line per send or ack, respectively, in the form
<time> <seq. number>
where <time> is the time in seconds since the start of the
transfer and <seq. number> is the sequence number being sent
or acked. I typically plot this data looking for suspicious
patterns.
The problem I was looking at was the bulk-data-transfer
throughput of medium delay network paths (1-6 sec. round trip
time) under typical DARPA Internet conditions. The trace of the
ftp transfer of a large file was used as the raw data source.
The method was:
- On a local host (but not the Sun running tcpdump), connect to
the remote ftp.
- On the monitor Sun, start the trace going. E.g.,
tcpdump host local-host and remote-host and port ftp-data >tracefile
- On local, do either a get or put of a large file (~500KB),
preferably to the null device (to minimize effects like
closing the receive window while waiting for a disk write).
- When transfer is finished, stop tcpdump. Use awk to make up
two files of summary data (maxsize is the maximum packet size,
tracedata is the file of tcpdump tracedata):
awk -f send-ack.awk packetsize=avgsize tracedata >sa
awk -f packetdat.awk packetsize=avgsize tracedata >pd
- While the summary data files are printing, take a look at
how the transfer behaved:
awk -f stime.awk tracedata | xgraph
(90% of what you learn seems to happen in this step).
- Do all of the above steps several times, both directions,
at different times of day, with different protocol
implementations on the other end.
- Using one of the Unix data analysis packages (in my case,
S and Gary Perlman's Unix|Stat), spend a few months staring
at the data.
- Change something in the local protocol implementation and
redo the steps above.
- Once a week, tell your funding agent that you're discovering
wonderful things and you'll write up that research report
"real soon now".
