431817b1aa
(That appears to be the usual installed name on *nix machines)
106 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
106 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext
1. Compression algorithm (deflate)
|
|
|
|
The deflation algorithm used by zlib (also zip and gzip) is a variation of
|
|
LZ77 (Lempel-Ziv 1977, see reference below). It finds duplicated strings in
|
|
the input data. The second occurrence of a string is replaced by a
|
|
pointer to the previous string, in the form of a pair (distance,
|
|
length). Distances are limited to 32K bytes, and lengths are limited
|
|
to 258 bytes. When a string does not occur anywhere in the previous
|
|
32K bytes, it is emitted as a sequence of literal bytes. (In this
|
|
description, `string' must be taken as an arbitrary sequence of bytes,
|
|
and is not restricted to printable characters.)
|
|
|
|
Literals or match lengths are compressed with one Huffman tree, and
|
|
match distances are compressed with another tree. The trees are stored
|
|
in a compact form at the start of each block. The blocks can have any
|
|
size (except that the compressed data for one block must fit in
|
|
available memory). A block is terminated when deflate() determines that
|
|
it would be useful to start another block with fresh trees. (This is
|
|
somewhat similar to the behavior of LZW-based _compress_.)
|
|
|
|
Duplicated strings are found using a hash table. All input strings of
|
|
length 3 are inserted in the hash table. A hash index is computed for
|
|
the next 3 bytes. If the hash chain for this index is not empty, all
|
|
strings in the chain are compared with the current input string, and
|
|
the longest match is selected.
|
|
|
|
The hash chains are searched starting with the most recent strings, to
|
|
favor small distances and thus take advantage of the Huffman encoding.
|
|
The hash chains are singly linked. There are no deletions from the
|
|
hash chains, the algorithm simply discards matches that are too old.
|
|
|
|
To avoid a worst-case situation, very long hash chains are arbitrarily
|
|
truncated at a certain length, determined by a runtime option (level
|
|
parameter of deflateInit). So deflate() does not always find the longest
|
|
possible match but generally finds a match which is long enough.
|
|
|
|
deflate() also defers the selection of matches with a lazy evaluation
|
|
mechanism. After a match of length N has been found, deflate() searches for a
|
|
longer match at the next input byte. If a longer match is found, the
|
|
previous match is truncated to a length of one (thus producing a single
|
|
literal byte) and the longer match is emitted afterwards. Otherwise,
|
|
the original match is kept, and the next match search is attempted only
|
|
N steps later.
|
|
|
|
The lazy match evaluation is also subject to a runtime parameter. If
|
|
the current match is long enough, deflate() reduces the search for a longer
|
|
match, thus speeding up the whole process. If compression ratio is more
|
|
important than speed, deflate() attempts a complete second search even if
|
|
the first match is already long enough.
|
|
|
|
The lazy match evaluation is not performed for the fastest compression
|
|
modes (level parameter 1 to 3). For these fast modes, new strings
|
|
are inserted in the hash table only when no match was found, or
|
|
when the match is not too long. This degrades the compression ratio
|
|
but saves time since there are both fewer insertions and fewer searches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Decompression algorithm (inflate)
|
|
|
|
The real question is, given a Huffman tree, how to decode fast. The most
|
|
important realization is that shorter codes are much more common than
|
|
longer codes, so pay attention to decoding the short codes fast, and let
|
|
the long codes take longer to decode.
|
|
|
|
inflate() sets up a first level table that covers some number of bits of
|
|
input less than the length of longest code. It gets that many bits from the
|
|
stream, and looks it up in the table. The table will tell if the next
|
|
code is that many bits or less and how many, and if it is, it will tell
|
|
the value, else it will point to the next level table for which inflate()
|
|
grabs more bits and tries to decode a longer code.
|
|
|
|
How many bits to make the first lookup is a tradeoff between the time it
|
|
takes to decode and the time it takes to build the table. If building the
|
|
table took no time (and if you had infinite memory), then there would only
|
|
be a first level table to cover all the way to the longest code. However,
|
|
building the table ends up taking a lot longer for more bits since short
|
|
codes are replicated many times in such a table. What inflate() does is
|
|
simply to make the number of bits in the first table a variable, and set it
|
|
for the maximum speed.
|
|
|
|
inflate() sends new trees relatively often, so it is possibly set for a
|
|
smaller first level table than an application that has only one tree for
|
|
all the data. For inflate, which has 286 possible codes for the
|
|
literal/length tree, the size of the first table is nine bits. Also the
|
|
distance trees have 30 possible values, and the size of the first table is
|
|
six bits. Note that for each of those cases, the table ended up one bit
|
|
longer than the ``average'' code length, i.e. the code length of an
|
|
approximately flat code which would be a little more than eight bits for
|
|
286 symbols and a little less than five bits for 30 symbols. It would be
|
|
interesting to see if optimizing the first level table for other
|
|
applications gave values within a bit or two of the flat code size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean-loup Gailly Mark Adler
|
|
gzip@prep.ai.mit.edu madler@alumni.caltech.edu
|
|
|
|
|
|
References:
|
|
|
|
[LZ77] Ziv J., Lempel A., ``A Universal Algorithm for Sequential Data
|
|
Compression,'' IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 23, No. 3,
|
|
pp. 337-343.
|
|
|
|
``DEFLATE Compressed Data Format Specification'' available in
|
|
ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1951.txt
|