754 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
754 lines
34 KiB
Plaintext
This is gprof.info, produced by makeinfo version 4.0 from gprof.texi.
|
||
|
||
START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
|
||
* gprof: (gprof). Profiling your program's execution
|
||
END-INFO-DIR-ENTRY
|
||
|
||
This file documents the gprof profiler of the GNU system.
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) 1988, 92, 97, 98, 99, 2000 Free Software Foundation,
|
||
Inc.
|
||
|
||
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
|
||
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
|
||
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
|
||
with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no
|
||
Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the
|
||
section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Line-by-line, Next: Annotated Source, Prev: Call Graph, Up: Output
|
||
|
||
Line-by-line Profiling
|
||
======================
|
||
|
||
`gprof''s `-l' option causes the program to perform "line-by-line"
|
||
profiling. In this mode, histogram samples are assigned not to
|
||
functions, but to individual lines of source code. The program usually
|
||
must be compiled with a `-g' option, in addition to `-pg', in order to
|
||
generate debugging symbols for tracking source code lines.
|
||
|
||
The flat profile is the most useful output table in line-by-line
|
||
mode. The call graph isn't as useful as normal, since the current
|
||
version of `gprof' does not propagate call graph arcs from source code
|
||
lines to the enclosing function. The call graph does, however, show
|
||
each line of code that called each function, along with a count.
|
||
|
||
Here is a section of `gprof''s output, without line-by-line
|
||
profiling. Note that `ct_init' accounted for four histogram hits, and
|
||
13327 calls to `init_block'.
|
||
|
||
Flat profile:
|
||
|
||
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
||
% cumulative self self total
|
||
time seconds seconds calls us/call us/call name
|
||
30.77 0.13 0.04 6335 6.31 6.31 ct_init
|
||
|
||
|
||
Call graph (explanation follows)
|
||
|
||
|
||
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
|
||
|
||
index % time self children called name
|
||
|
||
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long
|
||
0.00 0.00 40/13496 deflate
|
||
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast
|
||
0.00 0.00 13327/13496 ct_init
|
||
[7] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block
|
||
|
||
Now let's look at some of `gprof''s output from the same program run,
|
||
this time with line-by-line profiling enabled. Note that `ct_init''s
|
||
four histogram hits are broken down into four lines of source code -
|
||
one hit occurred on each of lines 349, 351, 382 and 385. In the call
|
||
graph, note how `ct_init''s 13327 calls to `init_block' are broken down
|
||
into one call from line 396, 3071 calls from line 384, 3730 calls from
|
||
line 385, and 6525 calls from 387.
|
||
|
||
Flat profile:
|
||
|
||
Each sample counts as 0.01 seconds.
|
||
% cumulative self
|
||
time seconds seconds calls name
|
||
7.69 0.10 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:349)
|
||
7.69 0.11 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:351)
|
||
7.69 0.12 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:382)
|
||
7.69 0.13 0.01 ct_init (trees.c:385)
|
||
|
||
|
||
Call graph (explanation follows)
|
||
|
||
|
||
granularity: each sample hit covers 4 byte(s) for 7.69% of 0.13 seconds
|
||
|
||
% time self children called name
|
||
|
||
0.00 0.00 1/13496 name_too_long (gzip.c:1440)
|
||
0.00 0.00 1/13496 deflate (deflate.c:763)
|
||
0.00 0.00 1/13496 ct_init (trees.c:396)
|
||
0.00 0.00 2/13496 deflate (deflate.c:727)
|
||
0.00 0.00 4/13496 deflate (deflate.c:686)
|
||
0.00 0.00 5/13496 deflate (deflate.c:675)
|
||
0.00 0.00 12/13496 deflate (deflate.c:679)
|
||
0.00 0.00 16/13496 deflate (deflate.c:730)
|
||
0.00 0.00 128/13496 deflate_fast (deflate.c:654)
|
||
0.00 0.00 3071/13496 ct_init (trees.c:384)
|
||
0.00 0.00 3730/13496 ct_init (trees.c:385)
|
||
0.00 0.00 6525/13496 ct_init (trees.c:387)
|
||
[6] 0.0 0.00 0.00 13496 init_block (trees.c:408)
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Annotated Source, Prev: Line-by-line, Up: Output
|
||
|
||
The Annotated Source Listing
|
||
============================
|
||
|
||
`gprof''s `-A' option triggers an annotated source listing, which
|
||
lists the program's source code, each function labeled with the number
|
||
of times it was called. You may also need to specify the `-I' option,
|
||
if `gprof' can't find the source code files.
|
||
|
||
Compiling with `gcc ... -g -pg -a' augments your program with
|
||
basic-block counting code, in addition to function counting code. This
|
||
enables `gprof' to determine how many times each line of code was
|
||
executed. For example, consider the following function, taken from
|
||
gzip, with line numbers added:
|
||
|
||
1 ulg updcrc(s, n)
|
||
2 uch *s;
|
||
3 unsigned n;
|
||
4 {
|
||
5 register ulg c;
|
||
6
|
||
7 static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
|
||
8
|
||
9 if (s == NULL) {
|
||
10 c = 0xffffffffL;
|
||
11 } else {
|
||
12 c = crc;
|
||
13 if (n) do {
|
||
14 c = crc_32_tab[...];
|
||
15 } while (--n);
|
||
16 }
|
||
17 crc = c;
|
||
18 return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
|
||
19 }
|
||
|
||
`updcrc' has at least five basic-blocks. One is the function
|
||
itself. The `if' statement on line 9 generates two more basic-blocks,
|
||
one for each branch of the `if'. A fourth basic-block results from the
|
||
`if' on line 13, and the contents of the `do' loop form the fifth
|
||
basic-block. The compiler may also generate additional basic-blocks to
|
||
handle various special cases.
|
||
|
||
A program augmented for basic-block counting can be analyzed with
|
||
`gprof -l -A'. I also suggest use of the `-x' option, which ensures
|
||
that each line of code is labeled at least once. Here is `updcrc''s
|
||
annotated source listing for a sample `gzip' run:
|
||
|
||
ulg updcrc(s, n)
|
||
uch *s;
|
||
unsigned n;
|
||
2 ->{
|
||
register ulg c;
|
||
|
||
static ulg crc = (ulg)0xffffffffL;
|
||
|
||
2 -> if (s == NULL) {
|
||
1 -> c = 0xffffffffL;
|
||
1 -> } else {
|
||
1 -> c = crc;
|
||
1 -> if (n) do {
|
||
26312 -> c = crc_32_tab[...];
|
||
26312,1,26311 -> } while (--n);
|
||
}
|
||
2 -> crc = c;
|
||
2 -> return c ^ 0xffffffffL;
|
||
2 ->}
|
||
|
||
In this example, the function was called twice, passing once through
|
||
each branch of the `if' statement. The body of the `do' loop was
|
||
executed a total of 26312 times. Note how the `while' statement is
|
||
annotated. It began execution 26312 times, once for each iteration
|
||
through the loop. One of those times (the last time) it exited, while
|
||
it branched back to the beginning of the loop 26311 times.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Inaccuracy, Next: How do I?, Prev: Output, Up: Top
|
||
|
||
Inaccuracy of `gprof' Output
|
||
****************************
|
||
|
||
* Menu:
|
||
|
||
* Sampling Error:: Statistical margins of error
|
||
* Assumptions:: Estimating children times
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Sampling Error, Next: Assumptions, Up: Inaccuracy
|
||
|
||
Statistical Sampling Error
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
The run-time figures that `gprof' gives you are based on a sampling
|
||
process, so they are subject to statistical inaccuracy. If a function
|
||
runs only a small amount of time, so that on the average the sampling
|
||
process ought to catch that function in the act only once, there is a
|
||
pretty good chance it will actually find that function zero times, or
|
||
twice.
|
||
|
||
By contrast, the number-of-calls and basic-block figures are derived
|
||
by counting, not sampling. They are completely accurate and will not
|
||
vary from run to run if your program is deterministic.
|
||
|
||
The "sampling period" that is printed at the beginning of the flat
|
||
profile says how often samples are taken. The rule of thumb is that a
|
||
run-time figure is accurate if it is considerably bigger than the
|
||
sampling period.
|
||
|
||
The actual amount of error can be predicted. For N samples, the
|
||
_expected_ error is the square-root of N. For example, if the sampling
|
||
period is 0.01 seconds and `foo''s run-time is 1 second, N is 100
|
||
samples (1 second/0.01 seconds), sqrt(N) is 10 samples, so the expected
|
||
error in `foo''s run-time is 0.1 seconds (10*0.01 seconds), or ten
|
||
percent of the observed value. Again, if the sampling period is 0.01
|
||
seconds and `bar''s run-time is 100 seconds, N is 10000 samples,
|
||
sqrt(N) is 100 samples, so the expected error in `bar''s run-time is 1
|
||
second, or one percent of the observed value. It is likely to vary
|
||
this much _on the average_ from one profiling run to the next.
|
||
(_Sometimes_ it will vary more.)
|
||
|
||
This does not mean that a small run-time figure is devoid of
|
||
information. If the program's _total_ run-time is large, a small
|
||
run-time for one function does tell you that that function used an
|
||
insignificant fraction of the whole program's time. Usually this means
|
||
it is not worth optimizing.
|
||
|
||
One way to get more accuracy is to give your program more (but
|
||
similar) input data so it will take longer. Another way is to combine
|
||
the data from several runs, using the `-s' option of `gprof'. Here is
|
||
how:
|
||
|
||
1. Run your program once.
|
||
|
||
2. Issue the command `mv gmon.out gmon.sum'.
|
||
|
||
3. Run your program again, the same as before.
|
||
|
||
4. Merge the new data in `gmon.out' into `gmon.sum' with this command:
|
||
|
||
gprof -s EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.out gmon.sum
|
||
|
||
5. Repeat the last two steps as often as you wish.
|
||
|
||
6. Analyze the cumulative data using this command:
|
||
|
||
gprof EXECUTABLE-FILE gmon.sum > OUTPUT-FILE
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Assumptions, Prev: Sampling Error, Up: Inaccuracy
|
||
|
||
Estimating `children' Times
|
||
===========================
|
||
|
||
Some of the figures in the call graph are estimates--for example, the
|
||
`children' time values and all the the time figures in caller and
|
||
subroutine lines.
|
||
|
||
There is no direct information about these measurements in the
|
||
profile data itself. Instead, `gprof' estimates them by making an
|
||
assumption about your program that might or might not be true.
|
||
|
||
The assumption made is that the average time spent in each call to
|
||
any function `foo' is not correlated with who called `foo'. If `foo'
|
||
used 5 seconds in all, and 2/5 of the calls to `foo' came from `a',
|
||
then `foo' contributes 2 seconds to `a''s `children' time, by
|
||
assumption.
|
||
|
||
This assumption is usually true enough, but for some programs it is
|
||
far from true. Suppose that `foo' returns very quickly when its
|
||
argument is zero; suppose that `a' always passes zero as an argument,
|
||
while other callers of `foo' pass other arguments. In this program,
|
||
all the time spent in `foo' is in the calls from callers other than `a'.
|
||
But `gprof' has no way of knowing this; it will blindly and incorrectly
|
||
charge 2 seconds of time in `foo' to the children of `a'.
|
||
|
||
We hope some day to put more complete data into `gmon.out', so that
|
||
this assumption is no longer needed, if we can figure out how. For the
|
||
nonce, the estimated figures are usually more useful than misleading.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: How do I?, Next: Incompatibilities, Prev: Inaccuracy, Up: Top
|
||
|
||
Answers to Common Questions
|
||
***************************
|
||
|
||
How do I find which lines in my program were executed the most times?
|
||
Compile your program with basic-block counting enabled, run it,
|
||
then use the following pipeline:
|
||
|
||
gprof -l -C OBJFILE | sort -k 3 -n -r
|
||
|
||
This listing will show you the lines in your code executed most
|
||
often, but not necessarily those that consumed the most time.
|
||
|
||
How do I find which lines in my program called a particular function?
|
||
Use `gprof -l' and lookup the function in the call graph. The
|
||
callers will be broken down by function and line number.
|
||
|
||
How do I analyze a program that runs for less than a second?
|
||
Try using a shell script like this one:
|
||
|
||
for i in `seq 1 100`; do
|
||
fastprog
|
||
mv gmon.out gmon.out.$i
|
||
done
|
||
|
||
gprof -s fastprog gmon.out.*
|
||
|
||
gprof fastprog gmon.sum
|
||
|
||
If your program is completely deterministic, all the call counts
|
||
will be simple multiples of 100 (i.e. a function called once in
|
||
each run will appear with a call count of 100).
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Incompatibilities, Next: Details, Prev: How do I?, Up: Top
|
||
|
||
Incompatibilities with Unix `gprof'
|
||
***********************************
|
||
|
||
GNU `gprof' and Berkeley Unix `gprof' use the same data file
|
||
`gmon.out', and provide essentially the same information. But there
|
||
are a few differences.
|
||
|
||
* GNU `gprof' uses a new, generalized file format with support for
|
||
basic-block execution counts and non-realtime histograms. A magic
|
||
cookie and version number allows `gprof' to easily identify new
|
||
style files. Old BSD-style files can still be read. *Note File
|
||
Format::.
|
||
|
||
* For a recursive function, Unix `gprof' lists the function as a
|
||
parent and as a child, with a `calls' field that lists the number
|
||
of recursive calls. GNU `gprof' omits these lines and puts the
|
||
number of recursive calls in the primary line.
|
||
|
||
* When a function is suppressed from the call graph with `-e', GNU
|
||
`gprof' still lists it as a subroutine of functions that call it.
|
||
|
||
* GNU `gprof' accepts the `-k' with its argument in the form
|
||
`from/to', instead of `from to'.
|
||
|
||
* In the annotated source listing, if there are multiple basic
|
||
blocks on the same line, GNU `gprof' prints all of their counts,
|
||
separated by commas.
|
||
|
||
* The blurbs, field widths, and output formats are different. GNU
|
||
`gprof' prints blurbs after the tables, so that you can see the
|
||
tables without skipping the blurbs.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Details, Next: GNU Free Documentation License, Prev: Incompatibilities, Up: Top
|
||
|
||
Details of Profiling
|
||
********************
|
||
|
||
* Menu:
|
||
|
||
* Implementation:: How a program collects profiling information
|
||
* File Format:: Format of `gmon.out' files
|
||
* Internals:: `gprof''s internal operation
|
||
* Debugging:: Using `gprof''s `-d' option
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Implementation, Next: File Format, Up: Details
|
||
|
||
Implementation of Profiling
|
||
===========================
|
||
|
||
Profiling works by changing how every function in your program is
|
||
compiled so that when it is called, it will stash away some information
|
||
about where it was called from. From this, the profiler can figure out
|
||
what function called it, and can count how many times it was called.
|
||
This change is made by the compiler when your program is compiled with
|
||
the `-pg' option, which causes every function to call `mcount' (or
|
||
`_mcount', or `__mcount', depending on the OS and compiler) as one of
|
||
its first operations.
|
||
|
||
The `mcount' routine, included in the profiling library, is
|
||
responsible for recording in an in-memory call graph table both its
|
||
parent routine (the child) and its parent's parent. This is typically
|
||
done by examining the stack frame to find both the address of the
|
||
child, and the return address in the original parent. Since this is a
|
||
very machine-dependent operation, `mcount' itself is typically a short
|
||
assembly-language stub routine that extracts the required information,
|
||
and then calls `__mcount_internal' (a normal C function) with two
|
||
arguments - `frompc' and `selfpc'. `__mcount_internal' is responsible
|
||
for maintaining the in-memory call graph, which records `frompc',
|
||
`selfpc', and the number of times each of these call arcs was traversed.
|
||
|
||
GCC Version 2 provides a magical function
|
||
(`__builtin_return_address'), which allows a generic `mcount' function
|
||
to extract the required information from the stack frame. However, on
|
||
some architectures, most notably the SPARC, using this builtin can be
|
||
very computationally expensive, and an assembly language version of
|
||
`mcount' is used for performance reasons.
|
||
|
||
Number-of-calls information for library routines is collected by
|
||
using a special version of the C library. The programs in it are the
|
||
same as in the usual C library, but they were compiled with `-pg'. If
|
||
you link your program with `gcc ... -pg', it automatically uses the
|
||
profiling version of the library.
|
||
|
||
Profiling also involves watching your program as it runs, and
|
||
keeping a histogram of where the program counter happens to be every
|
||
now and then. Typically the program counter is looked at around 100
|
||
times per second of run time, but the exact frequency may vary from
|
||
system to system.
|
||
|
||
This is done is one of two ways. Most UNIX-like operating systems
|
||
provide a `profil()' system call, which registers a memory array with
|
||
the kernel, along with a scale factor that determines how the program's
|
||
address space maps into the array. Typical scaling values cause every
|
||
2 to 8 bytes of address space to map into a single array slot. On
|
||
every tick of the system clock (assuming the profiled program is
|
||
running), the value of the program counter is examined and the
|
||
corresponding slot in the memory array is incremented. Since this is
|
||
done in the kernel, which had to interrupt the process anyway to handle
|
||
the clock interrupt, very little additional system overhead is required.
|
||
|
||
However, some operating systems, most notably Linux 2.0 (and
|
||
earlier), do not provide a `profil()' system call. On such a system,
|
||
arrangements are made for the kernel to periodically deliver a signal
|
||
to the process (typically via `setitimer()'), which then performs the
|
||
same operation of examining the program counter and incrementing a slot
|
||
in the memory array. Since this method requires a signal to be
|
||
delivered to user space every time a sample is taken, it uses
|
||
considerably more overhead than kernel-based profiling. Also, due to
|
||
the added delay required to deliver the signal, this method is less
|
||
accurate as well.
|
||
|
||
A special startup routine allocates memory for the histogram and
|
||
either calls `profil()' or sets up a clock signal handler. This
|
||
routine (`monstartup') can be invoked in several ways. On Linux
|
||
systems, a special profiling startup file `gcrt0.o', which invokes
|
||
`monstartup' before `main', is used instead of the default `crt0.o'.
|
||
Use of this special startup file is one of the effects of using `gcc
|
||
... -pg' to link. On SPARC systems, no special startup files are used.
|
||
Rather, the `mcount' routine, when it is invoked for the first time
|
||
(typically when `main' is called), calls `monstartup'.
|
||
|
||
If the compiler's `-a' option was used, basic-block counting is also
|
||
enabled. Each object file is then compiled with a static array of
|
||
counts, initially zero. In the executable code, every time a new
|
||
basic-block begins (i.e. when an `if' statement appears), an extra
|
||
instruction is inserted to increment the corresponding count in the
|
||
array. At compile time, a paired array was constructed that recorded
|
||
the starting address of each basic-block. Taken together, the two
|
||
arrays record the starting address of every basic-block, along with the
|
||
number of times it was executed.
|
||
|
||
The profiling library also includes a function (`mcleanup') which is
|
||
typically registered using `atexit()' to be called as the program
|
||
exits, and is responsible for writing the file `gmon.out'. Profiling
|
||
is turned off, various headers are output, and the histogram is
|
||
written, followed by the call-graph arcs and the basic-block counts.
|
||
|
||
The output from `gprof' gives no indication of parts of your program
|
||
that are limited by I/O or swapping bandwidth. This is because samples
|
||
of the program counter are taken at fixed intervals of the program's
|
||
run time. Therefore, the time measurements in `gprof' output say
|
||
nothing about time that your program was not running. For example, a
|
||
part of the program that creates so much data that it cannot all fit in
|
||
physical memory at once may run very slowly due to thrashing, but
|
||
`gprof' will say it uses little time. On the other hand, sampling by
|
||
run time has the advantage that the amount of load due to other users
|
||
won't directly affect the output you get.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: File Format, Next: Internals, Prev: Implementation, Up: Details
|
||
|
||
Profiling Data File Format
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
The old BSD-derived file format used for profile data does not
|
||
contain a magic cookie that allows to check whether a data file really
|
||
is a `gprof' file. Furthermore, it does not provide a version number,
|
||
thus rendering changes to the file format almost impossible. GNU
|
||
`gprof' uses a new file format that provides these features. For
|
||
backward compatibility, GNU `gprof' continues to support the old
|
||
BSD-derived format, but not all features are supported with it. For
|
||
example, basic-block execution counts cannot be accommodated by the old
|
||
file format.
|
||
|
||
The new file format is defined in header file `gmon_out.h'. It
|
||
consists of a header containing the magic cookie and a version number,
|
||
as well as some spare bytes available for future extensions. All data
|
||
in a profile data file is in the native format of the host on which the
|
||
profile was collected. GNU `gprof' adapts automatically to the
|
||
byte-order in use.
|
||
|
||
In the new file format, the header is followed by a sequence of
|
||
records. Currently, there are three different record types: histogram
|
||
records, call-graph arc records, and basic-block execution count
|
||
records. Each file can contain any number of each record type. When
|
||
reading a file, GNU `gprof' will ensure records of the same type are
|
||
compatible with each other and compute the union of all records. For
|
||
example, for basic-block execution counts, the union is simply the sum
|
||
of all execution counts for each basic-block.
|
||
|
||
Histogram Records
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
Histogram records consist of a header that is followed by an array of
|
||
bins. The header contains the text-segment range that the histogram
|
||
spans, the size of the histogram in bytes (unlike in the old BSD
|
||
format, this does not include the size of the header), the rate of the
|
||
profiling clock, and the physical dimension that the bin counts
|
||
represent after being scaled by the profiling clock rate. The physical
|
||
dimension is specified in two parts: a long name of up to 15 characters
|
||
and a single character abbreviation. For example, a histogram
|
||
representing real-time would specify the long name as "seconds" and the
|
||
abbreviation as "s". This feature is useful for architectures that
|
||
support performance monitor hardware (which, fortunately, is becoming
|
||
increasingly common). For example, under DEC OSF/1, the "uprofile"
|
||
command can be used to produce a histogram of, say, instruction cache
|
||
misses. In this case, the dimension in the histogram header could be
|
||
set to "i-cache misses" and the abbreviation could be set to "1"
|
||
(because it is simply a count, not a physical dimension). Also, the
|
||
profiling rate would have to be set to 1 in this case.
|
||
|
||
Histogram bins are 16-bit numbers and each bin represent an equal
|
||
amount of text-space. For example, if the text-segment is one thousand
|
||
bytes long and if there are ten bins in the histogram, each bin
|
||
represents one hundred bytes.
|
||
|
||
Call-Graph Records
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
Call-graph records have a format that is identical to the one used in
|
||
the BSD-derived file format. It consists of an arc in the call graph
|
||
and a count indicating the number of times the arc was traversed during
|
||
program execution. Arcs are specified by a pair of addresses: the
|
||
first must be within caller's function and the second must be within
|
||
the callee's function. When performing profiling at the function
|
||
level, these addresses can point anywhere within the respective
|
||
function. However, when profiling at the line-level, it is better if
|
||
the addresses are as close to the call-site/entry-point as possible.
|
||
This will ensure that the line-level call-graph is able to identify
|
||
exactly which line of source code performed calls to a function.
|
||
|
||
Basic-Block Execution Count Records
|
||
-----------------------------------
|
||
|
||
Basic-block execution count records consist of a header followed by a
|
||
sequence of address/count pairs. The header simply specifies the
|
||
length of the sequence. In an address/count pair, the address
|
||
identifies a basic-block and the count specifies the number of times
|
||
that basic-block was executed. Any address within the basic-address can
|
||
be used.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Internals, Next: Debugging, Prev: File Format, Up: Details
|
||
|
||
`gprof''s Internal Operation
|
||
============================
|
||
|
||
Like most programs, `gprof' begins by processing its options.
|
||
During this stage, it may building its symspec list
|
||
(`sym_ids.c:sym_id_add'), if options are specified which use symspecs.
|
||
`gprof' maintains a single linked list of symspecs, which will
|
||
eventually get turned into 12 symbol tables, organized into six
|
||
include/exclude pairs - one pair each for the flat profile
|
||
(INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT), the call graph arcs (INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS),
|
||
printing in the call graph (INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH), timing propagation
|
||
in the call graph (INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME), the annotated source listing
|
||
(INCL_ANNO/EXCL_ANNO), and the execution count listing
|
||
(INCL_EXEC/EXCL_EXEC).
|
||
|
||
After option processing, `gprof' finishes building the symspec list
|
||
by adding all the symspecs in `default_excluded_list' to the exclude
|
||
lists EXCL_TIME and EXCL_GRAPH, and if line-by-line profiling is
|
||
specified, EXCL_FLAT as well. These default excludes are not added to
|
||
EXCL_ANNO, EXCL_ARCS, and EXCL_EXEC.
|
||
|
||
Next, the BFD library is called to open the object file, verify that
|
||
it is an object file, and read its symbol table (`core.c:core_init'),
|
||
using `bfd_canonicalize_symtab' after mallocing an appropriately sized
|
||
array of symbols. At this point, function mappings are read (if the
|
||
`--file-ordering' option has been specified), and the core text space
|
||
is read into memory (if the `-c' option was given).
|
||
|
||
`gprof''s own symbol table, an array of Sym structures, is now built.
|
||
This is done in one of two ways, by one of two routines, depending on
|
||
whether line-by-line profiling (`-l' option) has been enabled. For
|
||
normal profiling, the BFD canonical symbol table is scanned. For
|
||
line-by-line profiling, every text space address is examined, and a new
|
||
symbol table entry gets created every time the line number changes. In
|
||
either case, two passes are made through the symbol table - one to
|
||
count the size of the symbol table required, and the other to actually
|
||
read the symbols. In between the two passes, a single array of type
|
||
`Sym' is created of the appropriate length. Finally,
|
||
`symtab.c:symtab_finalize' is called to sort the symbol table and
|
||
remove duplicate entries (entries with the same memory address).
|
||
|
||
The symbol table must be a contiguous array for two reasons. First,
|
||
the `qsort' library function (which sorts an array) will be used to
|
||
sort the symbol table. Also, the symbol lookup routine
|
||
(`symtab.c:sym_lookup'), which finds symbols based on memory address,
|
||
uses a binary search algorithm which requires the symbol table to be a
|
||
sorted array. Function symbols are indicated with an `is_func' flag.
|
||
Line number symbols have no special flags set. Additionally, a symbol
|
||
can have an `is_static' flag to indicate that it is a local symbol.
|
||
|
||
With the symbol table read, the symspecs can now be translated into
|
||
Syms (`sym_ids.c:sym_id_parse'). Remember that a single symspec can
|
||
match multiple symbols. An array of symbol tables (`syms') is created,
|
||
each entry of which is a symbol table of Syms to be included or
|
||
excluded from a particular listing. The master symbol table and the
|
||
symspecs are examined by nested loops, and every symbol that matches a
|
||
symspec is inserted into the appropriate syms table. This is done
|
||
twice, once to count the size of each required symbol table, and again
|
||
to build the tables, which have been malloced between passes. From now
|
||
on, to determine whether a symbol is on an include or exclude symspec
|
||
list, `gprof' simply uses its standard symbol lookup routine on the
|
||
appropriate table in the `syms' array.
|
||
|
||
Now the profile data file(s) themselves are read
|
||
(`gmon_io.c:gmon_out_read'), first by checking for a new-style
|
||
`gmon.out' header, then assuming this is an old-style BSD `gmon.out' if
|
||
the magic number test failed.
|
||
|
||
New-style histogram records are read by `hist.c:hist_read_rec'. For
|
||
the first histogram record, allocate a memory array to hold all the
|
||
bins, and read them in. When multiple profile data files (or files
|
||
with multiple histogram records) are read, the starting address, ending
|
||
address, number of bins and sampling rate must match between the
|
||
various histograms, or a fatal error will result. If everything
|
||
matches, just sum the additional histograms into the existing in-memory
|
||
array.
|
||
|
||
As each call graph record is read (`call_graph.c:cg_read_rec'), the
|
||
parent and child addresses are matched to symbol table entries, and a
|
||
call graph arc is created by `cg_arcs.c:arc_add', unless the arc fails
|
||
a symspec check against INCL_ARCS/EXCL_ARCS. As each arc is added, a
|
||
linked list is maintained of the parent's child arcs, and of the child's
|
||
parent arcs. Both the child's call count and the arc's call count are
|
||
incremented by the record's call count.
|
||
|
||
Basic-block records are read (`basic_blocks.c:bb_read_rec'), but
|
||
only if line-by-line profiling has been selected. Each basic-block
|
||
address is matched to a corresponding line symbol in the symbol table,
|
||
and an entry made in the symbol's bb_addr and bb_calls arrays. Again,
|
||
if multiple basic-block records are present for the same address, the
|
||
call counts are cumulative.
|
||
|
||
A gmon.sum file is dumped, if requested (`gmon_io.c:gmon_out_write').
|
||
|
||
If histograms were present in the data files, assign them to symbols
|
||
(`hist.c:hist_assign_samples') by iterating over all the sample bins
|
||
and assigning them to symbols. Since the symbol table is sorted in
|
||
order of ascending memory addresses, we can simple follow along in the
|
||
symbol table as we make our pass over the sample bins. This step
|
||
includes a symspec check against INCL_FLAT/EXCL_FLAT. Depending on the
|
||
histogram scale factor, a sample bin may span multiple symbols, in
|
||
which case a fraction of the sample count is allocated to each symbol,
|
||
proportional to the degree of overlap. This effect is rare for normal
|
||
profiling, but overlaps are more common during line-by-line profiling,
|
||
and can cause each of two adjacent lines to be credited with half a
|
||
hit, for example.
|
||
|
||
If call graph data is present, `cg_arcs.c:cg_assemble' is called.
|
||
First, if `-c' was specified, a machine-dependent routine (`find_call')
|
||
scans through each symbol's machine code, looking for subroutine call
|
||
instructions, and adding them to the call graph with a zero call count.
|
||
A topological sort is performed by depth-first numbering all the
|
||
symbols (`cg_dfn.c:cg_dfn'), so that children are always numbered less
|
||
than their parents, then making a array of pointers into the symbol
|
||
table and sorting it into numerical order, which is reverse topological
|
||
order (children appear before parents). Cycles are also detected at
|
||
this point, all members of which are assigned the same topological
|
||
number. Two passes are now made through this sorted array of symbol
|
||
pointers. The first pass, from end to beginning (parents to children),
|
||
computes the fraction of child time to propagate to each parent and a
|
||
print flag. The print flag reflects symspec handling of
|
||
INCL_GRAPH/EXCL_GRAPH, with a parent's include or exclude (print or no
|
||
print) property being propagated to its children, unless they
|
||
themselves explicitly appear in INCL_GRAPH or EXCL_GRAPH. A second
|
||
pass, from beginning to end (children to parents) actually propagates
|
||
the timings along the call graph, subject to a check against
|
||
INCL_TIME/EXCL_TIME. With the print flag, fractions, and timings now
|
||
stored in the symbol structures, the topological sort array is now
|
||
discarded, and a new array of pointers is assembled, this time sorted
|
||
by propagated time.
|
||
|
||
Finally, print the various outputs the user requested, which is now
|
||
fairly straightforward. The call graph (`cg_print.c:cg_print') and
|
||
flat profile (`hist.c:hist_print') are regurgitations of values already
|
||
computed. The annotated source listing
|
||
(`basic_blocks.c:print_annotated_source') uses basic-block information,
|
||
if present, to label each line of code with call counts, otherwise only
|
||
the function call counts are presented.
|
||
|
||
The function ordering code is marginally well documented in the
|
||
source code itself (`cg_print.c'). Basically, the functions with the
|
||
most use and the most parents are placed first, followed by other
|
||
functions with the most use, followed by lower use functions, followed
|
||
by unused functions at the end.
|
||
|
||
|
||
File: gprof.info, Node: Debugging, Prev: Internals, Up: Details
|
||
|
||
Debugging `gprof'
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
If `gprof' was compiled with debugging enabled, the `-d' option
|
||
triggers debugging output (to stdout) which can be helpful in
|
||
understanding its operation. The debugging number specified is
|
||
interpreted as a sum of the following options:
|
||
|
||
2 - Topological sort
|
||
Monitor depth-first numbering of symbols during call graph analysis
|
||
|
||
4 - Cycles
|
||
Shows symbols as they are identified as cycle heads
|
||
|
||
16 - Tallying
|
||
As the call graph arcs are read, show each arc and how the total
|
||
calls to each function are tallied
|
||
|
||
32 - Call graph arc sorting
|
||
Details sorting individual parents/children within each call graph
|
||
entry
|
||
|
||
64 - Reading histogram and call graph records
|
||
Shows address ranges of histograms as they are read, and each call
|
||
graph arc
|
||
|
||
128 - Symbol table
|
||
Reading, classifying, and sorting the symbol table from the object
|
||
file. For line-by-line profiling (`-l' option), also shows line
|
||
numbers being assigned to memory addresses.
|
||
|
||
256 - Static call graph
|
||
Trace operation of `-c' option
|
||
|
||
512 - Symbol table and arc table lookups
|
||
Detail operation of lookup routines
|
||
|
||
1024 - Call graph propagation
|
||
Shows how function times are propagated along the call graph
|
||
|
||
2048 - Basic-blocks
|
||
Shows basic-block records as they are read from profile data (only
|
||
meaningful with `-l' option)
|
||
|
||
4096 - Symspecs
|
||
Shows symspec-to-symbol pattern matching operation
|
||
|
||
8192 - Annotate source
|
||
Tracks operation of `-A' option
|
||
|