oster 856e0a920e A value of 1 for tracks/cylinder in the disklabel is apparently sub-optimal.
Thus we choose "4 * number_of_columns" as a more reasonable
value (until someone comes up with something better).
This pretends to properly address PR#11989.
2001-04-05 02:48:51 +00:00
..
2001-01-26 04:43:16 +00:00
2001-01-27 20:42:20 +00:00