133 lines
7.5 KiB
HTML
133 lines
7.5 KiB
HTML
<html><head<title>
|
|
Network Time Protocol Year 2000 Conformance Statement
|
|
</title></head><body><h3>
|
|
Network Time Protocol Year 2000 Conformance Statement
|
|
</h3>
|
|
|
|
<h4>Introduction</h4>
|
|
|
|
By the year 2000, the Network Time Protocol (NTP) will have been in
|
|
use for over two decades and remain the longest running, continuously
|
|
operating application protocol in the Internet. There is some concern,
|
|
especially in government and financial institutions, that NTP might
|
|
cause Internet applications to misbehave in terrible ways on the epoch
|
|
of the next century. This document presents an analysis of the various
|
|
hazards that might result in incorrect time values upon this epoch. It
|
|
concludes that incorrect time values due to the NTP timescale, protocol
|
|
design and reference implementation are highly unlikely. However, it is
|
|
possible that external reference time sources used by NTP could
|
|
misbehave and cause NTP servers to distribute incorrect time values to
|
|
significant portions of the Internet. Note that, while this document
|
|
addresses the issues specifically with respect to Unix systems, the
|
|
issues are equally applicable to Windows and VMS systems.
|
|
|
|
<h4>The NTP Timescale</h4>
|
|
|
|
It will be helpful in understanding the issues raised in this document
|
|
to consider the concept of a universal timescale. The conventional civil
|
|
timescale used in most parts of the world is based on Universal
|
|
Coordinated Time (UTC sic), formerly known as Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).
|
|
UTC is based on International Atomic Time (TAI sic), which is derived
|
|
from hundreds of cesium clocks in the national standards laboratories of
|
|
many countries. Deviations of UTC from TAI are implemented in the form
|
|
of leap seconds, which occur on average every eighteen months. For
|
|
almost every computer application today, UTC represents the universal
|
|
timescale extending into the indefinite past and indefinite future. We
|
|
know of course that the UTC timescale did not exist prior to 1972, the
|
|
Gregorian calendar did not exist prior to 1582, the Julian calendar did
|
|
not exist prior to 54 BC and we cannot predict exactly when the next
|
|
leap second will occur. Nevertheless, most folks would prefer that, even
|
|
if we can't get future seconds numbering right beyond the next leap
|
|
second, at least we can get the days numbering right until the end of
|
|
reason.
|
|
|
|
<p>The universal timescale can be implemented using a binary counter of
|
|
indefinite width and with the unit seconds bit placed somewhere in the
|
|
middle. The counter is synchronized to UTC such that it runs at the same
|
|
rate and the units increment coincides with the UTC seconds tick. The
|
|
NTP timescale is constructed from 64 bits of this counter, of which 32
|
|
bits number the seconds and 32 bits represent the fraction. With this
|
|
design, the counter runs in 136-year cycles, called eras, the latest of
|
|
which began with a counter value of zero at 0h 1 January 1900. The
|
|
design assumption is that further low order bits, if required, are
|
|
provided by local interpolation, while further high order bits, when
|
|
required, are provided by external means. The important point to be made
|
|
here is that the high order bits must ultimately be provided by
|
|
astronomers and disseminated to the population by international means.
|
|
Ultimately, should a need exist to align a particular NTP era to the
|
|
current calendar, the operating system in which NTP is embedded must
|
|
provide the necessary high order bits, most conveniently from the file
|
|
system or flash memory.
|
|
|
|
<h4>The Year 2000 Era</h4>
|
|
|
|
With respect to the year 2000 issue, the most important thing to observe
|
|
about the NTP timescale is that it knows nothing about days, years or
|
|
centuries, only the seconds since the beginning of the latest era, the
|
|
current one of which began on 1 January 1900. On 1 January 1970 when
|
|
Unix life began, the NTP timescale showed 2,208,988,800 and on 1 January
|
|
1972 when UTC life began, it showed 2,272,060,800. On the last second of
|
|
year 1999, the NTP timescale will show 3,155,672,599 and one second
|
|
later on the first second of the next century will show 3,155,672,600.
|
|
Other than this observation, the NTP timescale has no knowledge of or
|
|
provision for any of these eclectic seconds.
|
|
|
|
<p>The NTP timescale is almost never used directly by system or
|
|
application programs. The generic Unix kernel keeps time in seconds and
|
|
microseconds (or nanoseconds) to provide both time of day and interval
|
|
timer functions. In order to synchronize the Unix clock, NTP must
|
|
convert to and from its representation and Unix representation. Unix
|
|
kernels implement the time of day function using two 32-bit counters,
|
|
one representing the seconds since Unix life began and the other the
|
|
microseconds or nanoseconds of the second. In principle, the seconds
|
|
counter will wrap around in 136-year eras, the next of which will begin
|
|
in 2106. How the particular Unix semantics interprets the counter values
|
|
is of concern, but is beyond the scope of discussion here.
|
|
|
|
<p>While incorrect time values due to the NTP timescale and protocol
|
|
design or reference implementation upon the epoch of the next century
|
|
are highly unlikely, hazards remain due to incorrect software external
|
|
to NTP. These hazards include the Unix kernel and library routines which
|
|
convert Unix time to and from conventional civil time in seconds,
|
|
minutes, hours, days and years. Although NTP uses these routines to
|
|
format monitoring data displays, they are not used to read or set the
|
|
NTP clock. They may in fact cause problems with certain application
|
|
programs, but this is not an issue which concerns NTP correctness.
|
|
|
|
<p>While it is extremely unlikely that NTP will produce incorrect time
|
|
values upon the epoch, it is possible that some external source to which
|
|
NTP synchronizes may produce a discontinuity which could then induce a
|
|
NTP discontinuity. The NTP primary (stratum 1) time servers, which are
|
|
the ultimate time references for the entire NTP population, obtain time
|
|
from various sources, including radio and satellite receivers and
|
|
telephone modems. Not all sources provide year information and not all
|
|
of these provide time in four-digit form. In point of fact, the NTP
|
|
reference implementation does not use the year information, even if
|
|
available. Instead, the year information is provided from the file
|
|
system, which itself depends on the Unix clock.
|
|
|
|
<p>The NTP protocol specification requires the apparent NTP time derived
|
|
from external servers to be compared to the file system time before the
|
|
clock is set. If the discrepancy is over 1000 seconds, an error alarm is
|
|
raised requiring manual intervention. This makes it very unlikely that
|
|
even a clique of seriously corrupted NTP servers will result in
|
|
incorrect time values. In the case of embedded computers with no file
|
|
system, the design assumption is that the current era be established
|
|
from flash memory or a clock chip previously set by manual means.
|
|
|
|
<p>It is essential that any clock synchronization protocol, including
|
|
NTP, include provisions for multiple-server redundancy and multiple-
|
|
route diversity. Past experience has demonstrated the wisdom of this
|
|
approach, which protects clients against hardware and software faults,
|
|
as well as incorrectly operating reference sources and sometimes even
|
|
buggy software. For the most reliable service, we recommend multiple
|
|
reference sources for primary servers, including a backup radio or
|
|
satellite receiver or telephone modem. We also recommend that primary
|
|
servers run NTP with other primary servers to provide additional
|
|
redundancy and mutual backup should the reference sources themselves
|
|
fail or operate incorrectly.
|
|
|
|
<hr><a href=index.htm>Home</a><address><a
|
|
href=mailto:mills@udel.edu> David L. Mills <mills@udel.edu></a>
|
|
</address></a></body></html>
|