6887492c26
While it's true that it's part of the traditional 4.4BSD security model, there may come a time where a different "primary" security model used for fine-grained privileges (ie., splitting root's responsibilities to various privileges that can be assigned) may want to still have a securelevel setting. Idea from Daniel Carosone: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2006/08/25/0001.html The location of the removed files, for reference, was: src/secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_securelevel.c src/secmodel/bsd44/securelevel.h |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| arch | ||
| compat | ||
| dev | ||
| exec | ||
| kauth | ||
| misc | ||
| net | ||
| netinet | ||
| syscall | ||
| vfs | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.inc | ||
| TODO | ||