5bb52324f6
Since the tests don't (usually) fail no-one ever noticed the missing char. That is, the "received this" and "expected this" strings were supposed to appear in the output err message as "<<string>>" but one of those closing '>' chars was missing. No-one should ever notice this change in normal operation, as the tests are not intended to fail. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bin | ||
crypto | ||
dev | ||
fs | ||
games | ||
include | ||
ipf | ||
kernel | ||
lib | ||
libexec | ||
modules | ||
net | ||
rump | ||
sbin | ||
share | ||
sys | ||
usr.bin | ||
usr.sbin | ||
h_macros.h | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile.inc | ||
README |
$NetBSD: README,v 1.4 2012/05/18 15:36:21 jruoho Exp $ When adding new tests, please try to follow the following conventions. 1. For library routines, including system calls, the directory structure of the tests should follow the directory structure of the real source tree. For instance, interfaces available via the C library should follow: src/lib/libc/gen -> src/tests/lib/libc/gen src/lib/libc/sys -> src/tests/lib/libc/sys ... 2. Equivalently, all tests for userland utilities should try to follow their location in the source tree. If this can not be satisfied, the tests for a utility should be located under the directory to which the utility is installed. Thus, a test for env(1) should go to src/tests/usr.bin/env. Likewise, a test for tcpdump(8) should be in src/tests/usr.sbin/tcpdump, even though the source code for the program is located under src/external. 3. Otherwise use your own discretion.