NetBSD/tests/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/msg_217.c

74 lines
1.7 KiB
C

/* $NetBSD: msg_217.c,v 1.12 2023/07/07 19:45:22 rillig Exp $ */
# 3 "msg_217.c"
// Test for message: function '%s' falls off bottom without returning value [217]
/* lint1-extra-flags: -X 351 */
int
random(int n)
{
if (n < 0)
return -3;
}
/* expect-1: warning: function 'random' falls off bottom without returning value [217] */
/*
* The pattern 'do { } while (0)' is often used in statement macros.
* Putting a 'return' at the end of such a macro is legitimate, the embracing
* 'do { } while (0)' is probably there to conform to a coding standard or
* to otherwise reduce confusion.
*
* Seen in external/bsd/libevent/dist/event_tagging.c, function
* encode_int_internal.
*
* Before tree.c 1.243 from 2021-03-21, lint wrongly reported that the
* 'while 0' was unreachable. This has been fixed by allowing the 'while 0'
* in a do-while-false loop to be unreachable. The same could be useful for a
* do-while-true.
*
* Before func.c 1.83 from 2021-03-21, lint wrongly reported that the function
* would fall off the bottom.
*/
int
do_while_return(int i)
{
do {
return i;
} while (0);
}
/*
* C99 5.1.2.2.3 "Program termination" p1 defines that as a special exception,
* the function 'main' does not have to return a value, reaching the bottom
* is equivalent to returning 0.
*
* Before func.c 1.72 from 2021-02-21, lint had wrongly warned about this.
*/
int
main(void)
{
}
int
reachable_continue_leads_to_endless_loop(void)
{
for (;;) {
if (1)
continue;
break;
}
}
int
unreachable_continue_falls_through(void)
{
for (;;) {
if (0)
/* expect+1: warning: statement not reached [193] */
continue;
break;
}
}
/* expect-1: warning: function 'unreachable_continue_falls_through' falls off bottom without returning value [217] */