21aab71556
Add two new sh syntax test cases to check for bug fixes for the parser problems (syntax errors unidentified) reported in the two PRs. In the latter case, also include some tests that test similar looking, valid, syntax - to make sure the fix for the PR does not break code that should not fail. This is not needed for the earlier PR as other tests, and just normal parsing, is sufficient. These tests have been verified to fail with a current /bin/sh and to pass with the sh updates that are to be committed soon -- and because that fix is expected within hours, the tests are not marked as expected to fail, just let them actually fail for now. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bin | ||
crypto | ||
dev | ||
fs | ||
games | ||
include | ||
ipf | ||
kernel | ||
lib | ||
libexec | ||
modules | ||
net | ||
rump | ||
sbin | ||
share | ||
sys | ||
usr.bin | ||
usr.sbin | ||
h_macros.h | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile.inc | ||
README |
$NetBSD: README,v 1.4 2012/05/18 15:36:21 jruoho Exp $ When adding new tests, please try to follow the following conventions. 1. For library routines, including system calls, the directory structure of the tests should follow the directory structure of the real source tree. For instance, interfaces available via the C library should follow: src/lib/libc/gen -> src/tests/lib/libc/gen src/lib/libc/sys -> src/tests/lib/libc/sys ... 2. Equivalently, all tests for userland utilities should try to follow their location in the source tree. If this can not be satisfied, the tests for a utility should be located under the directory to which the utility is installed. Thus, a test for env(1) should go to src/tests/usr.bin/env. Likewise, a test for tcpdump(8) should be in src/tests/usr.sbin/tcpdump, even though the source code for the program is located under src/external. 3. Otherwise use your own discretion.