6887492c26
While it's true that it's part of the traditional 4.4BSD security model, there may come a time where a different "primary" security model used for fine-grained privileges (ie., splitting root's responsibilities to various privileges that can be assigned) may want to still have a securelevel setting. Idea from Daniel Carosone: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-security/2006/08/25/0001.html The location of the removed files, for reference, was: src/secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_securelevel.c src/secmodel/bsd44/securelevel.h
9 lines
343 B
Plaintext
9 lines
343 B
Plaintext
# $NetBSD: files.bsd44,v 1.2 2007/11/21 22:49:07 elad Exp $
|
|
|
|
defflag secmodel_bsd44_logic
|
|
defflag secmodel_bsd44 : secmodel_bsd44_logic, secmodel_securelevel
|
|
|
|
file secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44.c secmodel_bsd44
|
|
file secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_logic.c secmodel_bsd44_logic
|
|
file secmodel/bsd44/secmodel_bsd44_suser.c secmodel_bsd44_logic
|